New system: Ground Zero

[falkor2k15]

I've given as much deep thought to this as I have to VdW as well as to all the people who lost their lives on 9/11... my testing, modelling and experimentation with this system is greater still - but has yet to reach free near-fall speed in terms of profit!

Conclusion 1: Any system based on betting unhits or repeats needs to track all 0s, 1s, 2s..... as many as appear within the session.... if it's to win in the long run.
Conclusion 2: Betting unhits (or the units lowest on the 0s, 1s, 2s+ scale) is better than trying to win on repeats even though we know, besides the 0s having to catch up based on the law of the large numbers, the repeats are guaranteed to jump ahead like a snake that expands and contracts based on the law of the third.

Don't ask me how I reached those conclusions - it wasn't with the help of 19 Arab assistants. An example of (2) would be trying to get our first repeat... we don't know when it's going to happen - but it could be as late as spin 25 - by which time we would be bankrupt unless we spent many weeks waiting for 24 unique 1s to only bet once for a measly 12 units profit! On the other hand, with the unhits or sleepers, the most we can lose on trying to get our first win is 35; we then know unambiguously that we haven't reached our objective and much quicker too. I predicted this back in 1985 believe it or not.

Ground Zero, therefore, is based on flat-betting the 0s--unless the 2s+ is greater than the 0s added to the 1s, in which case we switch to betting the 0s + 1s. We are aiming here to never chase our losses, but to break the bank with the ultimate, fun, positive progression of annihilation, in order to get revenge on the Rothschilds for their part in 9/11 - but simply from flat-betting the whole time for greater humiliation.

We start out almost immediately on the 0s after 2 virtual spins with 2 uniques, flat-betting 1 unit on the 35 unhits then 34 then 33....etc. If we are in profit by spin 7 then we freeze betting till future instructions are given (to be posted in stages later in this topic). We never bet spin 8. If we lose on spins 3-7 then the set is over and we do not chase our losses.

42% of sets that win by spin 7 (not +1 but a more healthy profit) will go through the next stage where we can wait out any remaining uniques that appear in a row before our first repeat, which we can also wait out before recommencing on the 0s - guided by the spin number of the first repeat. We avoid being demolished to due to foreknowledge.
58% of sets will move into the losing bracket where we have less predictability and protection, so we don't go down that route - it's like jumping off the 104th storey.

I will fly-by with some further instructions soon... stay tuned and keep looking out the window as there is light at the end of the tunnel!

[winkel]

Normally I don´t comment others ideas.

But let me ask you: You are sure you know what you are talking about? Starting bets after 2. spin is suicide.

[falkor2k15]

Normally I don´t comment others ideas.

But let me ask you: You are sure you know what you are talking about? Starting bets after 2. spin is suicide.

I used to think the same thing, but now it's back to 1985 thinking... this is the only way to break the bank! Repeaters are out; sleepers are back in.

[nottophammer]

At the moment the average doc building for Jackpot247.com has in spins 1-10 a 75% chance of a repeat, i bet Winkel could give you a more accurate figure

[Vitalij_D]

It turns out a long game with a swing around zero balance . A frequent repetitions gone deep into the minus .

[falkor2k15]

This system is about betting sleepers over repeaters, but what defines each changes as the set progresses:

Sleepers = 0s, Repeats = 2s+
36 1 0
35 2 0
--start betting 0s
34 3 0
33 4 0
32 5 0
31 6 0
30 7 0
--win on spin 7 (+15 so far) so stop betting but continue to track remaining sleepers till the first repeat.
29 8 0
28 9 0
27 10 0
26 11 0
25 12 0
24 13 0
23 14 0
22 15 0
22 14 1
--repeat! This completes the end of first wave on spin 16 (make a note of that). We most likely now recommence betting on the 0s - but this will be confirmed later.
21 14 0 1
--repeat!
21 13 1 1
--repeat!
21 13 0 2
--repeat! count3 >1! Now we change to:
Sleepers = 0s + 1s, Repeats = 3s+
So now we are back to a 35 number bet.

Imagine the following:
19 8 5 3 2

The sleepers (19+8+5+3), i.e. the tail of the expanding snake, will take longer to impact the leading repeaters (2) at the head of the snake, so it no longer becomes a suicide mission.

[JSG240592]

This is interesting please do expand on your technique ? .

[falkor2k15]

This is interesting please do expand on your technique ? .

It's interesting because we are playing repeaters in mirror reverse with a larger base of sleepers that always decrease or stay the same, so that we don't have to use a progression.

Attached is a demo based on only the first rule above - but there will be more rules to follow. Each wave will have a chart, so you will need to learn it in order to make the correct decisions at each checkpoint; however, the number of units wagered remains 1 throughout.

Stats look like this:


WAVE 1
"tail mode" begins at 0 = play only 0s as sleepers to appear
appearers0 = first set of appearers before a repeat happened = 11



WAVE 2
repeats1 = number of repeats in a row = 2 (beginning on spin 12)
For now bets are not recommenced until I publish a decisions table.



WAVE 3
tail mode mode is now 1 - it changed during the repeats 1 stage at the end of wave 2 - so we play 0s + 1s as the new sleepers.
appearers1 = second set of appearers = 2



WAVE 4
repeaters2 = 1+ (for now I've ended sets prematurely at this point)

WAVE 5
tail mode stays at 1 - but wave 4 wasn't completed properly anyhow.

[falkor2k15]

One thing I forgot to mention is that we can salvage lost sets with one possible lifeline where the first repeat hits before spin 8.

97      Win (1)   41   Lose   56   57.73195876
56      Win (2)   23   Lose   33   58.92857143
33      Win (3)   5   Lose   28   84.84848485

We start with 97 sets: 41 go through to the next stage and 56 lose.
Out of those 56, we can get a similar percentage to win on the next series of sleepers: 23 go through to the winners ladder, but 33 (out of the original 97) have to be scrapped entirely and the losses absorbed; however, since those 64/97 sets could potentially lead to a positive progression that breaks the bank, albeit with flat-betting, I don't know about you guys but I don't mind losing 33% or whatever it is?

The reason we cannot salvage more sets is because if we try and do the same thing again a 2nd time around we get hit with 85% losses - so we only have one chance to bring a set back from the dead!

[falkor2k15]

Ignore the salvaged set data above for now - we might be able to salvage more than that - to be determined at a future date! Let's concentrate on the winner's ladder:

Remember: the first stop win (Appearers 1) after 2 spins when we commence betting on 35 numbers then 34, then 33, 32..... is spin 7 - we don't play spin 8. Following that we wait till the appearers end and the first repeat occurs. We simply note down that number, and at the end of the repeats we also note down the "tailmode" (for want of a better word).

As per the denzie system we wait for our first appearer to show before re-commencing betting on them (always on the appearers/sleepers as defined by the tailmode) based on this table, which gives us our best guess for a stop win: (default is if you can't remember)

Tailmode (2)	Repeat wave 1st spin (1)	Appearers (2) stop win
0	default	2
0	spin 8	3
0	spin 9-12	2
0	spin 13-19	1
0	spin 20+	0 (wait for next repeat(s))
1	default	8
1	spin 8-20	8
1	spin 21+	5
2	default	15

[falkor2k15]

This is slightly too complicated, so I am going to change the 2nd column to current spin # instead of 1st spin for repeats, and then re-calculate...