Which system(s) needs coding/testing over 1 million spins?

[denzie]

I think this system is a really great one

So do I.  Not understand why others not post reaction here. It's free of charge though 

[BellagioOwner]

Yes, the wallpaper test is valid. We all know and agree that "there's no way
to win in the long run".  So the point of the wallpaper test is to show if
you are going to get your ass handed to you (like I'm doing to you now)
quickly and often, or if it has merit for more testing and work.

If the "test" is based on some numbers you could post them for fun and see how the systems work on them.
Now... on the main topic of the thread. I believe systems that would be nice to be tested on longrun 1million coded are the ones that are based on statistics and bets based on Deviations, mean etc. I think they are the only one with any chance against BIG longrun.

[Tomla021]

also would love to see Hotzone by Ignatus tested for a million spins--I tried it in mini sessions and havent lost yet

[BelgianPlayer]

i played this hotzone a few times and gave it up after only 7 wins from 24 games.

for me it was a failure or i had some really bad luck

[fetaklaci]

Bayes

May I ask what progression is it or where can I find it?

About the hotzone thing.. Maybe this is where the difference between rng and live comes into play.

[BelgianPlayer]

fetaklaci, are you talking about the 91 step progression?

[fetaklaci]

@BelgianPlayer Yes, that one