RNGs use some dirty tricks

[Hoddini]

Like most people, I had been playing pure RNG based roulette (not the airball version) for a while without any good runs. Most of the time I'd win a bit then after some minutes of play the losses would start streaming in in a manner not consistent with what you'd see on a normal roulette. I know with continued play your chances of losing increase but those who've experienced RNGs know what I'm talking about.
Luckily however, I noticed some flaw in the RNG system. The system I was using used to roll out the names of players and how much they've won after each spin at the bottom of the screen. Weird thing is that whenever I was on a winning streak or a generally good run, many other people were winning too. Whenever I was on a bad run, very few people were winning (under 4) in each instance and all of them were winning very low amounts. The pattern was so consistent I tracked it for two weeks and it held up.
This could only mean one thing. The system had periods in which it was set to be fair enough and it also had periods when it was "cleaning house." It shouldn't come as a surprise the "cleaning house" periods were way more than the fair play periods. Armed with this valuable information, I set out to really see if my assumptions were right. And they were. I was only playing when most people were winning and I was able to get real good results as opposed to playing without regarding the "cleaning house" periods.
Built a good bankroll over two weeks using my usual systems....something I could only dream of before I made my discovery. Three days ago a significant change was made to the RNG. The winning results have been populated with random names that win extraordinary amounts after each spin consistently. This is true because on each table you'll find the same names winning really big amounts after each and every spin at any time of day or night, AFTER EVERY SINGLE SPIN. The amounts won by these random user names are around $1000 - $5000 after every spin on a $0.1 minimum bet table.
My conclusion is that they realized some people had figured out how their "pay periods" work and incorporated this to throw them off balance. Take home message - "NEVER TRUST PURE RNG, THEY ARE ALL DIRTY"

[Ross]

I don't believe this.

For a view of how the make-up of the numbers
varies use Explicator.  Shows why most "systems"
fail because conditions change.

[Ross]

Attached a spin file from BetVoyager No-Zero.

A really difficult set. Try these in Explicator.

[Ross]

Some good spins from BVNZ.

Up 215 units in 54 spins.

Use Explicator to see the difference.

[Hoddini]

I don't believe this.

For a view of how the make-up of the numbers
varies use Explicator.  Shows why most "systems"
fail because conditions change.

Excuse my ignorance but what is Explicator? I've tried googling it but it simply points me back here. Mind expaunding.

[Hoddini]

From my experience, the Pattern Breaker by John Legend is a pretty good system. Normally it would be rare to lose 4 in ten plays with such a system. Guess what? It happened on a RNG system. Call it bad luck but I found that very weird.

[nowun]

Take home message - "NEVER TRUST PURE RNG, THEY ARE ALL DIRTY"

I don't believe this.

I agree with Ross, I play RNG on BV almost exclusively and get good and bad runs, but come out ahead everytime.  BV is one of the best RNG sites for honesty.  I can not vouch for other RNG sites.

[Ross]

I agree that BV is O.K. and their newer desktop interface is
as good as it gets.  Only thing it lacks is a "+1" button to add
a chip to existing bets.

Explicator is here...

link:://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=18070.0

Just for starters watch what happens when you have ten Ones and three Twos
on the bottom line.....

[bleep24]

Do not trust Wm. Hill RNG.  I have always had  unbelievably bad experiences with it.  I never play anyone`s RNG but might try BV after the comments on here.

Bleep24

[nowun]

Do not trust Wm. Hill RNG.  I have always had  unbelievably bad experiences with it.

Same here, I would never go near them again.  I could "feel" them cheating when I played there.