Devils Lines

[Roulettedevil]

When I was crazy and I didn't know better 
I used to play bet voyager all the time, I played 3 in a bed as I called it..
Or probably neighbours as others call it.
Simply play the last number hit and it's neighbour either side, up to 18 numbers in total, you'll be amazed how many repeats you get, again if you do play, don't for too long!
Try it in practice

[blueman]

 

[Thunder Pants]

Betvoyager no zero - RNG 
Europe/Malta time (11:00 - 11:15)

5 line
After that shit last night (initially 8 times RB - the first 16 numbers) now this (the first 17 numbers)? Luckily today play money!!!

6
8
36 
13
9       A B B A B

31
16
36
29
27    B A B A A

8
16
35
30
17     B A B A A  (progression 1-2-3-5-8)
19
11
         B A            (progression 13- BINGO??)

F.cking Martingale is big  no, nooooo........... We need another progression?

This is actually a really good example why you should NEVER play RNG with real money. Only in RNG does something like that happen instantly. You can argue that the math is wrong of cause with 7 times of half a chance is roughly 0,8% of loosing. Even if you just see it as 7 chances single flips of a coin where we loose if it hits our exact 7 pre-selected sets. Also dont forget that we keep changing the predetermined sets & also plays in groups of 5 thus getting the 7 out of sync with the group dosnt count. Sure some of this could be argued if it has a effect. But if you ever attempt to simply get 7 "heads" in a row with a real coin then better go grab some snacks & put on a movie or 2 as well. Yes it could happen right away, but it really shouldnt. Still cant believe my local tax goverment organisation allow such RNG casino sites around.

[Roulettedevil]

Why do people still play RNG?,....is it because it's simply quicker to play ?
Can't be a money thing because you can play plenty of live wheels with min table value 0.10p, good one is betfair.

[RouletteGhost]

RNG is not roulette

It's a an online computer game designed by companies for casino profit

It is not roulette. Never was never will be

[Thunder Pants]

Had a 3 hour session yesterday playing this a bit randomly with 5 & 4 length set/groups & it worked ok, a lot of small wins & 2 losses, but still make a 40-45%-ish profit overall.  However one thing struck me after playing & something that seem to be confirmed by the listed sessions: there really arnt many long streaks when betting like this? Like the longest streak i noticed was just 7x A's in a row?

This bring me back to my early EC betting days of betting Red & Black & either betting one colour or follow the colour and whatnot. However however you play you always has to watch out for those long "killer streaks" of 12 reds in a row that will bleed your bankroll dry if you try Martingale-ing or that 15 long RBRBRBRBRBRBRBR that you didnt expect & happen way too often. A little surpriced i didnt see something like this with the A & B sets.

It could just be a luck of cause & our data samples so far is fairly small or even be wheel dependant .. but it does follow the logic behind the set selection (physical area & real human dealer for maximum variation) & betting on set changing (and not set streaking). If it "holds water" then it does open the door for some larger quicker betting like wait for 3 or 4 of a set to repeat (like BBB or AAAA) and start a even safer (or larger?) bet progression .

[bleep24]

Hi Thunder Pants,

How I agree with you.  I never seem to encounter these massive long streaks that people talk about (Are they only RNG or dodgy casinos) so yes we can use this observation to our advantage.  If you do encounter a RFH and it is only once in a zillion spins you should still be well, well in profit.  I only play live: yes it is slower but if you are confident that it is honest then you can play some systems to win.

Bleep24

[Roulettedevil]

for those playing this variation on these lines, just looking for one repeat, wait for change
i  use 1-2-3-5 prog, tweak to your own preference.
todays spins +79