Spot the difference.

[bleep24]

Some time ago I was using differential betting on R/B and it was successful to a certain degree.  Main problem was an imbalance between R/B.  I tried to counter this by switching sides when it got to 10 units on one side.  Of course it then put itself back in balance by going the opposite side when you have just changed.

What I am considering is using all E/C`s but one at a time revolving.   eg:    RHO (A)   or BLE (B)

Marker (no bet) is R - side A.      Start betting A = 1 unit       B = 2 units    Difference is 1 unit to be bet on L.    L comes out.  Next bet A = 2 units   B = 1 unit. Difference 1 unit bet O          O loses    next bet A  3 units   B =  1 unit    difference 2 units on side A  -  bet R   etc.

Idea is to spread out imbalance more.

Comments/ideas please.

Brian

[nottophammer]

ROTT 

[mogul397]

Some time ago I was using differential betting on R/B and it was successful to a certain degree.  Main problem was an imbalance between R/B.  I tried to counter this by switching sides when it got to 10 units on one side.  Of course it then put itself back in balance by going the opposite side when you have just changed.

What I am considering is using all E/C`s but one at a time revolving.   eg:    RHO (A)   or BLE (B)

Marker (no bet) is R - side A.      Start betting A = 1 unit       B = 2 units    Difference is 1 unit to be bet on L.    L comes out.  Next bet A = 2 units   B = 1 unit. Difference 1 unit bet O          O loses    next bet A  3 units   B =  1 unit    difference 2 units on side A  -  bet R   etc.

Idea is to spread out imbalance more.

Comments/ideas please.

Brian

Not sure I completely understand what you are doing. But the obvious problem with
any progressive kind of betting, is the inevitable pattern where losses come in a streak.
Just trying to call attention to the problem.

I have been playing with the method where you basically play 5 street.
(Can't find the post).
3 units on low and 2 units on the 5rd dozen.  You are leaving out the 4rh DS.

You win 1 unit and lose 5 units on a loss, with a hard progression.

I have not lost 2 in a row, and it is geared for 4 losses.

But my thinking was this. WHY do you have to chase a loss on the very next spin?
Spreading out the recoup of losses by delaying the progression til later spins would
kill the occasional killer streaks that ruin you. Wait some number of spins and take
your next shot at recoup. Then some more spins again and try again. Betting
that you will wait yourself out of the losing streak.

[bleep24]

Hi Mogul,

The whole idea is to stop streaks that is why it is switching between all the E/C`s.

Brian

[mogul397]

I get that. But I have also watched and observed the same streaks
of, say, doubles while trying to track 3 EC's with your NLE.

If it fixed the problem, then I would have used it.

And while figuring that I could play the last result (double or 2 into 3),
it can chop with that too.

That's why I gave up and figured that you just need to have the bankroll and
determination to play it out the way you do. Hence my questions about your
bankroll and such.  Cause you seem to be able to ride it out.

[bleep24]

Hi Mogul,

Yes I ride it out because it is one method that I have faith in.(NLE)  I have seen and played where progressions become never ending (and so will you have of.

Yes you need to be a bit brave and that is why I only ever start with betting 1 unit.

My idea for spot the difference is a revolving one so streaks will not affect it (You are only betting an EC once every 6 spins)

Anyway, keep up the good work and keep taking the tablets!!!!

Brian

[mogul397]

The question, as you say, is if you have faith in it. And then have fully
calculated the bank to a comfort level. I don't like to lose, but I've
NEVER seen anyone like you publically continually make money.

And as I say, it is close to my heart.

And somehow, when I see 3-4 doubles, the multiples always seem to bring it back.

10 units adds up to 45 units bank.  $5 is almost $250. $225 actually.

Of course I could do $2 units I guess.

[bleep24]

 Hi Mogul,

Although I still play (and win) NLE I am always looking for another system/method to have a bit variety.   I only like playing sessions of about 30/40 spins though I might play 2 times a day. 

What I am suggesting you test is `spot the difference`      I have extensively tested this and found it to be very good winning the vast majority of my sessions (and ones that I did not I packed in but could have easily played on and would probably won those as well)   What I have found is that the key to this is variance.  We all know that betting R/B even differentially one side runs away from the other, though you can swop sides to counter balance and hopefully it will even itself out.

What I am using is a mix up of all EC`s.     eg:   ROL ERL ELB ERH OBL     etc.  This is the top row so obviously opposite for bottom row.
Betting the difference using +1/-1  (roll a dice if you like to get selection allocating a number to an EC.  eg:  1 = R   2 = L   3  = E  etc.)  do it for each spin or make a row in advance.  You can always change them as you play.
Well worth you `road testing` Mogul.

Cheers,     Brian

[mogul397]

Yeah. "road test".  Another popular saying is, "run it up a flag pole and see who salutes it".

I agree that there is more than one way to skin a cat......

"Way # 28.  Crazy glue and a toothbrush".

And it is nice to have a toolkit.

Forgive me, but I am not sure I understand the specifics of what you are doing.

How you generate that list, and then how you are betting. (No shit)

Can you please give a short detail example?

Thanks

Don't forget to check out the other post I made, The post in it has some
merit I think, if you only risk $20 at $1 bets.

[bleep24]

Hi Mogul,

Looking for cats now.

I will post an example this evening when I have more time.

Brian

[bleep24]

Differential betting using EC`s.

     27 (marker)  5 27   8 8 14  32 36 30  11 14 16  13 17 29
     
     R                  O  L    E  R  L   E   L   B    E   R   H    O  B   L

                         1  1    2  1  2   1   1   2    3   4   3     4   3   2 
                         2  3    2  3  2   3   4   3    2   1   2     1   2   3
                       -1+2    X+2 X -2 +3 +1  -1+3 -1   +3 +1  -1           End +9

I am NOT answering any questions on this.  It is about time some of you put your thinking caps on.  All the information is here for you to work it out.

Bleep
Bleep 

[RouletteGhost]

I am NOT answering any questions on this. 

Mogul tantrum triggered

[bleep24]

I am delighted, RG.

[mogul397]

Good.

Nobody will know what you're talking about so you're spitting into the
wind, no matter how much time you have.