James Wendell, did you believe him?

[MoneyT101]

The forum is dead so lets get some discussion going.....

I was doing some digging in the old forums and i came across a couple of names of people who created something that can beat the game of roulette.  There were many claims but some of the people i will mention stand out because they were a little different. 

Diksexlic - non random approach
Charles Edward Hampshire A.K.A. CHE - Imbalances/pattern trigger
James Wendell - Win with math ( I personally believe there is some non random to this)

After much research i have reason to believe these people did beat the game.  What i find crazy abut it all isnt the fact that the game of roulette was beaten; there were different approaches to making it happen.

James wendell will be the focus on this topic because his claims were so outrageous.  Even tho i believe diksexlic could do the same as james but he didnt make the claim so many times and for so many years.  Atleast not that i saw...

[MoneyT101]

James said......

"You must see what will happen in the future.And I'm sure that no one here can do that.There is just no way in hitting anything unless you ca see the future. But there is a way that this can be done . Once you can see the future in what will happen then you can change the outcome to fit your play by turning the same odds that beat you which is the house odds into your favor .Yes I have done this and much much more.

The secret is not to fight the game but to use what you see and use what you see to change the house odds unto your side.
Every one is trying to beat the game but the real secret is using what you see to your advantage.
Studying what millions of people are studying won't work and anyone selling a system is a liar in plain English.
The answer is there I found it but I really doubt it will ever be found by anyone in the world in many life times.As my friends say it's very very deep and nobody can even come near my thoughts of what I discovered.."

"Let's face the truth . To win you must change the odds back to your side. The house use to have the edge but now if you use enough of probability's you will get Absolute Probability, Now It won't mean it might happen it will now mean it will happen when a string of probability are put together.

Numbers never will be wrong ,that's what you need to truly beat the game. Numbers have to always obey the Laws of math. The event itself will always be wrong if studied because it has unknown factor's.But studying the numbers that the event stands for and using the Laws of Math which the numbers of the event stand for you will always be a winner.
Remember these never work
Any system in the world None work
Any kind of Progression
Testing
Guessing
Just read my past post

What you people now know that no system can ever work with the thought you people been given or gave over the 10 or so years here .The reason for that nothing was base on fact's But using all the Laws of Math your using only fact's.wake up you must have facts never Guess."

[MoneyT101]

We must see the future...
Change odds that beat us so we can beat it....
Numbers have to obey the laws of math...

Cant beat the game using same information everyone has been using.  Only win with the facts...

hmmmm,  yes, sounds very crazy....

how do we change the odds to our side?

[Still]

How to change odds? 

Very simple.

Go to this thread:

link:s://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=15635.0

Then, "see the future" and "use what you see". 

After you practice a while, you will be able to use the laws of math to tell you if you have odds in your favor on a consistent basis. 

Hardly anybody does it this way.

Few people have even thought of this way. 

As such, it fits the description outlined by the named poster under discussion. 

Why search farther?

Why guess more?

[falkor2k15]

Yeah, it sounds like James was describing Non-Random! I never heard of him before... thanks for bringing to our attention.

"Changing odds" - is this really what we need to do? How about finding a cheap investment instead?

[falkor2k15]

rrbb suspected that Charles had found an exploit in the weak relationship of a Non-Random method.

I don't believe pattern breakers work - at least John Legend's never worked!

[Taotie]

All three were BS.

[Steve]

Any system can "work" in short term. Its simple. More testing gives more trustworthy results

[Still]

Let's think in practical terms for a minute. 

First, let's estimate how long it would take, how many months or years worth of practice, to master nowun's precognition method.   

Let's say it would take the average practitioner 1 year to achieve a 3% edge, or 2 years to achieve a 30% edge.   At that point, the practitioner would have to be more worried about being banned for winning too consistently. 

Now, let's take all these hints from all these people who claim to have some edge, but are only willing to drop little crumbs off the table of their big banquet. 

If you collected all the little crumbs that drop off their banquet spread, you might achieve a 3% edge in 6 years, and a 5% edge in 10 years...IF AT ALL.  It is entirely unknown.   And you will have to work very very hard all those years to make any sense of the little tiny crumb hints dropped off the huge banquet spread that they enjoy daily...IF AT ALL. 

On the other hand, if you go nowun's route, you may have a 60% chance of gaining a 3% edge in a year, or a 50% chance to get a 30% edge in two years.   In a worst case scenario, you gain no edge in that time, but you gain some peace of mind, and take a step closer to immortality. 

You have to estimate these options. 

I think precognition is the BETTER BET, compared to a thousand little tiny crumbs off the overflowing banquet table these people SAY they enjoy daily. 

Another way to think of it is, these people will only ever give you hints to save some time, but if it took the crumb-dropper four years to come up with the idea for their edge (if any), then they will never want to give you hints that would save you those four years.  In other words, if they worked four years, then they want you to work four years too, and will only try to save you two years in a six year journey...assuming they have any edge at all.   

The downside of the above scenario is they set you on the path of a six year journey, and none of the hints saved you any time whatsoever. So you wasted six years starving on the crumbs from their plentiful bounty...if any at all. 

Maybe you would never have spent even a year if the feasting father figure never dropped any hints in the first place.   

I believe that if someone starts dropping hints, they will never stop dropping hints, and so, we starve either way.   

Can anybody spot any flaws in this logic?

 

[iggiv]

I don't know about Diksexlic, but the others 2 are b/s...

By the way i doubt that one who really beats roulette is gonna boast about it

The forum is dead so lets get some discussion going.....

I was doing some digging in the old forums and i came across a couple of names of people who created something that can beat the game of roulette.  There were many claims but some of the people i will mention stand out because they were a little different. 

Diksexlic - non random approach
Charles Edward Hampshire A.K.A. CHE - Imbalances/pattern trigger
James Wendell - Win with math ( I personally believe there is some non random to this)

After much research i have reason to believe these people did beat the game.  What i find crazy abut it all isnt the fact that the game of roulette was beaten; there were different approaches to making it happen.

James wendell will be the focus on this topic because his claims were so outrageous.  Even tho i believe diksexlic could do the same as james but he didnt make the claim so many times and for so many years.  Atleast not that i saw...

[cht]

I don't know about Diksexlic, but the others 2 are b/s...

By the way i doubt that one who really beats roulette is gonna boast about it

I agree.