• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

The only way to beat roulette is by increasing accuracy of predictions (changing the odds). This is possible on many real wheels.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

Does this version of the Star System works?

Started by Andre Chass, Aug 07, 05:47 PM 2017

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

ego


How little you know - one big progression and all in will never work and will fail ...
Reckon you don't have a solid selection method where you can win within three attempts.

I will try to save you and say that you should aim for less then 50% win target and then use regression, so when you lose you operate with casino money and have to encounter two losing session after each other to bust, that is pretty rare and will keep you longer in the game.

But with your gambling mentality there is no hope, because i know you don't listen to what i say.
So this reply is just waste of forum space and time and energy from my part.

Cheers
Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

Andre Chass

Hello ego!

I'm just trying to make any cash.
I listen to what u say for sure and I would like some help here to find the best way, the best system or strategy to not lose.
Could you explain more  what you said about your strategy?
Can you show an example, please?
Because I didn't understand what you show me how to play.
Thanks in advance!
Nothing ventured, nothing gained...

Andre Chass

Why wouldn't a series have an increasingly lower probability of extending than a single event has of happening once?

Obviously, each unique spin has a probability of 50% (academically, by excluding the greens) for either color.

However, the overall proportion of total reds vs blacks should be 50%. So every time another of the same color is added to the group, the probability of the group/sample containing ONLY that one color decreases. Is there really a 50% probability that a sample size of 100 (e.g.) will contain 100 reds or blacks? When a person gambles on the roulette spin, he may be betting FOR a single spin, or AGAINST a series.

Isn't saying that the wheel has no memory like saying the wheel hasn't had a haircut in (x) weeks? A gambler isn't betting on the wheel, he's betting on the statistics. Past data would appear to be relevant due to the sampling.

The trick is to be in the right place at the right time: at what point will the group or sampling attempt to correct itself to ensure an equal distribution of reds and blacks? Because obviously it is inevitable
Nothing ventured, nothing gained...

-