Secrety Key

[Andre Chass]

PRIYANKA Random Thoughts

arithmetic progression

I've spent a lot of time on this reading about arithmetic progression (99 pages) and my conclusion is that doesn't increase accuracy of bets.
There's no difference saying red will come up 50% over the long run... It's just a ilusion...

After reading almost all the content on arithmetic progression, and almost all the posts, I came to a conclusion: There is no system that will win long term.
The game has been around for centuries and I believe all tests have been done over the years by mathematicians around the world. So it seems like we're trying to reinvent the wheel.

Yes, efficient systems exist in wich we can take advantage of that, but we will never be able to challenge math.

The best thing to do is to use the combination of an efficient system together with an efficient strategy as well.
I've been playing roulette for about 1 year and everything I learned leads me to think that way.
If there was an unbeatable system, we would be at that moment enjoying life with expansive cars, beautiful women and a big mansion... If there was an infallible system, we would not have been in this forum for years searching for the golden pot.

Steve is right!

The secret key do no exist!

[RouletteGhost]

There are only two ways to increase the accuracy of bets.

1- a truly biased wheel
2- visual ballistics, ball release point and speed.

Good luck on both

Everything else combats house edge

We may create systems and strategies as hobby and for love of the game but the HE remains

Sorry to say but that's 99 pages of wasted time

You will read things there like "in 4 spins a dozen must repeat" or "in 3 spins a color must repeat" (minus the zero)

Well whoopty doo. That doesn't help at all. Hanks for nothing long thread.

Avoid falkor posts especially he is stuck in some weird bubble that god only knows

That being said I do believe that not all strategies are created equal. Martingale on a color after 3 misses is NOT the same as betting against "rare" sequences. No systems are created equal but none increase accuracy of predictions

I advocate for betting against rare dozen sequences. I do it. I win. But I never live under the false assumption that I decrease the house edge or that I'm increasing my accuracy of prediction

Guys like falkor think they will use pigeonholes and saxon houses to somehow gain edge, it's lunacy.

Don't. Buy. The. Malarkey. No matter how the chips hit that mat, the house edge remains.

[wiggy]

The secret key do no exist!

That was your mistake!

It's one of these you need!

[nottophammer]

I'd been ply roulette for about 1 year

you'll need to study some more, a year thats nothing, it taken me at least 14 years and only start to win, wont say regularly, as i win.
Today on the FOBT under 60 minutes 21.50 for .25 units, can't use a £1 unit because of max bet £100, or £13.80 max on a single number, max payout £500 in any single spin.

I'll await for steves comment bla,bla,bla.

Andre,
In KTF topic i showed on avg in spins 11-40 get 15.7 or 15.8 non-hit come, should see 5 in spins 11-20, 5 in spins 21-30 and 5 in 31-40, but they usually come as 7,+2 in spins 11-20, 12,+2 and 15,+0, and as you can see the trot that falkor cant figure out is there 7,+2 - 12,+2  and 24,+0.

Piece of piss if you can read the trot
"Trotity trot, trotity trot, the noughts became overtly hot! Merily, merily, merily, merily, the 2s went gently down the stream..."¸¸.•*¨*•♫♪:

[nottophammer]

Andre,
See the 20 spins underneath same game just reset and as you see spins 51-60 that are spins 11-20, gave 5 non-hit, why did i bet 25 units at spin 20, avg mate, avg, fuck steve bollox,you need to study non-hit, the larger group of the starting 37 or my case 40 spins, as they hit, then Turbo/denzie starts,
Piece of piss 0x, 1x then >1x, need help PM the guvnor Mr winkel, He is the man.

You like it Wiggy 

[MoneyT101]

That was your mistake!

It's one of these you need!

😂😂😂

Andre the random thoughts topic was created to open the forum members eyes to new thoughts and different types of bets.

The only way you will find anything is having an open mind and trying to think.

In the random thoughts topic you will not find a winning system but if you take what you learn there and read the other topics by priyanka and the topic by rrbb and mix all the ideas together.  You just might come up with something that can win

Each idea is part of a bigger puzzle.

[Andre Chass]

Andre,
See the 20 spins underneath same game just reset and as you see spins 51-60 that are spins 11-20, gave 5 non-hit, why did i bet 25 units at spin 20, avg mate, avg, f*** steve bollox,you need to study non-hit, the larger group of the starting 37 or my case 40 spins, as they hit, then Turbo/denzie starts,
Piece of piss 0x, 1x then >1x, need help PM the guvnor Mr winkel, He is the man.

You like it Wiggy 

I'm curious to know your technique.

Could you explain? Give an example of how I can use it?

[Andre Chass]

That was your mistake!

It's one of these you need!

Very funny!!!

[DoctorSudoku]

There are only two ways to increase the accuracy of bets.

1- a truly biased wheel
2- visual ballistics, ball release point and speed.
Good luck on both
Everything else combats house edge

We may create systems and strategies as hobby and for love of the game but the HE remains

Sorry to say but that's 99 pages of wasted time

You will read things there like "in 4 spins a dozen must repeat" or "in 3 spins a color must repeat" (minus the zero)
Well whoopty doo. That doesn't help at all. Hanks for nothing long thread.

Avoid falkor posts especially he is stuck in some weird bubble that god only knows
That being said I do believe that not all strategies are created equal. Martingale on a color after 3 misses is NOT the same as betting against "rare" sequences. No systems are created equal but none increase accuracy of predictions

I advocate for betting against rare dozen sequences. I do it. I win. But I never live under the false assumption that I decrease the house edge or that I'm increasing my accuracy of prediction
Guys like falkor think they will use pigeonholes and saxon houses to somehow gain edge, it's lunacy.
Don't. Buy. The. Malarkey. No matter how the chips hit that mat, the house edge remains.

Good post. I agree with multiple points in your post, including the house edge-related comments in general and the betting against "rare dozen sequences" that sometimes can be profitable.

[Andre Chass]

The only way you will find anything is having an open mind and trying to think.

I'm really trying to get an open mind about roulette... But there's still a lot to learn...

I'm trying hard to not stop believing...

[winkel]

arithmetic progression

I've spent a lot of time on this reading about arithmetic progression (99 pages) and my conclusion is that doesn't increase accuracy of bets.
There's no difference saying red will come up 50% over the long run... It's just a ilusion...

After reading almost all the content on arithmetic progression, and almost all the posts, I came to a conclusion: There is no system that will win long term.

By this you dismissed one of the good winning systems.

[Herby]

Mist, I missed it too