VdW

[RouletteGhost]

Sensitive is an understatement

He let Caleb derail GUT instead of ignoring him

[Scarface]

Sensitive is an understatement

He let Caleb derail GUT instead of ignoring him

Yea, I'm definitely not trying to derail.  I'm interested in his VDW method, just hesitant to use a progression like that.  Winkel has good ideas.  I'm pretty sure his GUT thread is what lead me to this forum

[ozon]

Going back to Nick's Vdw
If we have very stable selections by AP, we can even more restrict the variance. After 4 or even 3 straight losing bets we wait for virtual win, in this way we avoid long series of loses.
In some thread I read that by keeping the rules, drawdowns in exceptional circumstances exceeded -100 units from highest point.
One thing that can be used is this progression

Only theoretically, I have an idea for a very long progressions designed for bot and RNG.
We use these steps of progression, but in this way, raise the stakes after 20units down from the highest point of the bankroll, or say if the 20 losing bets from the top rise in steps
1
2
3
5
8
12
18
This is 980 units, and the must-140 lost bets from highest point to lose.
Sometimes you need thousands of spins to reach new high. But this is just a theory

We play so when we lose the first 20 units, and we play 2 units we must win 20 bets to back  to 1 unit, we have to either win 20 bets or lose 20 bets at each level. If  we  win 20 bets   on higher level and  we  have new high we reset.

[DoctorSudoku]

We use these steps of progression, but in this way, raise the stakes after 20units down from the highest point of the bankroll, or say if the 20 losing bets from the top rise in steps
1
2
3
5
8
12
18
This is 980 units,

Ozon,
If you are going to use a negative progression, then why not try something milder, like
1 1 1 1 1 1 1
2 2 2 2 2 2 2, etc.

The above is the original gr8player progression, but you can use modified and shortened versions of it. Your bankroll will thank you for it.

[ozon]

My progression is even milder.
111111111111111111111
22222222222222222222 etc
We got 20 bets for step if we lose all 20 bets in rise the stake.
The concept is to master the virtual limits of bet selection
But it's just a concept, at any moment we can get a series that will increase the virtual limits and lose.

In  the  past  i test alot Gr8 progression and  is  no good , becouse when  we  have  at beginning very  bad  series , at the higher  levels stakes  rise  to  slow  to get out  from hole.It  is  short term progression.

[DoctorSudoku]

Ozon,
Or you can try the D' Alembert +1/-1 progression with appropriate stop loss. But your original proposed progression is too long and steep.

[winkel]

Sensitive is an understatement

He let Caleb derail GUT instead of ignoring him

I love this argument. The girl let the raper rape her instead of ignoring him

[RouletteGhost]

Quite the extreme comparison but I kind of get the point

[RouletteGhost]

It is quite easy Priyanka.

First:
There are 16 possible APs.
10 of them end with 2 possible results. All these Aps are longer than 6 spins!

So bet only the APs 123 234 135 345 246 456.
If you bet one of those and it lost, stop and start again.

Use the Power Martingale 1 3 7 15 31. These 5 Steps will meet at least 1 Winner AP.
And it breaks the 50:50 because you will win 1 unit per bet, not only 1 unit per attack!

Second:

Don´t use EC´s to bet. Use LW. You will see, you can transfer almost every betselection to VdW.

e.g.: You bet EC. choose HL. Your virtual betresults are LWLW.. You expect a L on attack!
next AP you had results  HLHL in spins. Normal VdW tells you to bet on H in spins. Attack-AP tells you you will Lose. So bet on Low instead!

What's LW?

[RouletteGhost]

Never mind. Got it

[Proofreaders2000]

bump