Great new REPEATERS System by Palestis !

[jekhb76]

Good morning folks,
Just noticed a great new repeater System created by Palestis, i really think this has great potentiaal. I tested it for a few hours now with great results.
Please visit the following link for the complete description on the method.
link:://forum.x/index.php?topic=2134.0
Have a great day - Eddy.

[cht]

Posted about that earlier when you guys were discussing about gaps. 

[jekhb76]

Posted about that earlier when you guys were discussing about gaps. 

GM, Sorry i missed that. Gladly i found it. Maybe we can adjust it even further, but so far, allready very Nice results.

[sniper]

Hi JEKHB76,

Cut down the numbers you bet.

[goldrosen]

Thanks for sharing JEKHB76.

There's one statement I couldn't agree more in the thread.

"I see system players do it quite regularly.  A good example is the KTF and the GUT.  Players testing and playing it on paper would look forwards and backwards in the data and say, "If we would have played such and such crossing here then we would have won, or if we'd have stopped here instead of here we would have won."  Along the way they keep curve fitting and changing the rules, oblivious of the error in testing.  Correctly testing a system, and analyzing data is much harder than people realize." â€" Real

@JEKHB76, I saw you were discussing strategy and system.
Do you think KTF, WTF, GUT can be list down in full system steps & rules so that if everyone using the same system they all will get the same results.
Then we won't see a lot of curve fitting practice, practice and practice which doesn't make sense and will break when in real play.
What do you think?

[nottophammer]

Thanks for sharing JEKHB76.

There's one statement I couldn't agree more in the thread.

"I see system players do it quite regularly.  A good example is the KTF and the GUT.  Players testing and playing it on paper would look forwards and backwards in the data and say, "If we would have played such and such crossing here then we would have won, or if we'd have stopped here instead of here we would have won."  Along the way they keep curve fitting and changing the rules, oblivious of the error in testing.  Correctly testing a system, and analyzing data is much harder than people realize." â€" Real

@JEKHB76, I saw you were discussing strategy and system.
Do you think KTF, WTF, GUT can be list down in full system steps & rules so that if everyone using the same system they all will get the same results.
Then we won't see a lot of curve fitting practice, practice and practice which doesn't make sense and will break when in real play.
What do you think?

jekhb76
Look,do you need anymore

goldrosen

    Member
    *
    29
    Still Thinking.
    Rated: +3
    User posts join approval queueModerated

[Madi]

Whatever his history is saying doesnt matter. Right now whats wrong he is saying.?

[Azim]

Thanks for sharing JEKHB76.

There's one statement I couldn't agree more in the thread.

"I see system players do it quite regularly.  A good example is the KTF and the GUT.  Players testing and playing it on paper would look forwards and backwards in the data and say, "If we would have played such and such crossing here then we would have won, or if we'd have stopped here instead of here we would have won."  Along the way they keep curve fitting and changing the rules, oblivious of the error in testing.  Correctly testing a system, and analyzing data is much harder than people realize." â€" Real

@JEKHB76, I saw you were discussing strategy and system.
Do you think KTF, WTF, GUT can be list down in full system steps & rules so that if everyone using the same system they all will get the same results.
Then we won't see a lot of curve fitting practice, practice and practice which doesn't make sense and will break when in real play.
What do you think?

In any sport. If you ask any professional, how did they get to where they are, the answer is PRACTICE.
They might not win all tournament's and make money. However they will finish high enough to make a living out of it.

If you going to take roulette seriously and want to make money, you will have to practice it.

Let's say we were allowed to use computers at the table. We would still need to practice and remember which numbers are the neighbor's of the number we expect to fall.

My friend winning in roulette you have to learn 3 basic rules. Go find them either in KTF, WTF, LOTT or GUT.

[goldrosen]

In any sport. If you ask any professional, how did they get to where they are, the answer is PRACTICE.
They might not win all tournament's and make money. However they will finish high enough to make a living out of it.

If you going to take roulette seriously and want to make money, you will have to practice it.

Let's say we were allowed to use computers at the table. We would still need to practice and remember which numbers are the neighbor's of the number we expect to fall.

My friend winning in roulette you have to learn 3 basic rules. Go find them either in KTF, WTF, LOTT or GUT.

Thanks Pal, I got you!

Then I guess..

"With right tool, good money management and practice, any gambling activity can produce a steady income."

Yea? Haha.

[cht]

To win in any gambling games you have to design your system based on math and statistics.

To avoid curve fitting, mechanise the signal into an arrow. Test this arrow signal on historical data from different locations.Test it on future live data. Test it at the wheels you plan to play at.

If your system is common,  eg. ECs test it on all EC games - roulette,  baccarat, sicbo.......