• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

The only way to beat roulette is by increasing accuracy of predictions (changing the odds). This is possible on many real wheels.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

The General

Started by denzie, Apr 07, 06:46 AM 2018

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

cht

Quote from: Steve on Apr 07, 07:33 PM 2018
Do you get a room when you agree with someone who understands primary school math?

You prefer people with illogical, unsubstantiated claims.

Again grow up. Nobody is forcing you to understand basic math and logic.
Show us your graph.

What is your typical variance ?

Steve

Be more specific and ill be happy to substantiate any relevant claims.  :thumbsup:
"The only way to beat roulette is by increasing the accuracy of predictions"
Roulettephysics.com ← Professional roulette tips
Roulette-computers.com ← Hidden electronics that predicts the winning number
Roulettephysics.com/roulette-strategy ← Why most systems lose

cht

Quote from: Steve on Apr 08, 01:54 AM 2018
Be more specific and ill be happy to substantiate any relevant claims.  :thumbsup:
I borrow maestro question for The General that he duly responded. Respect.:thumbsup:

Quote from: maestro on Apr 06, 03:23 PM 2018
@general steve...can you post a graph say distribution of outcomes when you have biased wheel play with your roulette computer just wonder how does it look like..and what makes you bet on what you bet... thanks

DSAA posted his average AP variance is 400 units and more.

Can you tell us what your roulette computer typical variance is ?

cht

No disrespect to The General, DSAA or steve.

We want to know the facts about AP and roulette physics computer for our education.

Steve

Sure, ill respond in detail within a day or so. But ample information is already at :.roulette-computers.com and :.hybridroulettecomputer.com

The edge can be high as 150% so the bankroll drawdowns are often no more than 50 units. It just depends on the edge. Ill explain more soon, but again the websites have it already including public group demos and resulting charts.

No edge comes close. But its legal in  about half of casinos. And it takes balls to use them.
"The only way to beat roulette is by increasing the accuracy of predictions"
Roulettephysics.com ← Professional roulette tips
Roulette-computers.com ← Hidden electronics that predicts the winning number
Roulettephysics.com/roulette-strategy ← Why most systems lose

nottophammer

How do you win at roulette, simple, make the right decision

Steve

Regarding your question, I checked and already the information is on my sites I provided links for. It's a bit unfair with roulette computers though, because you can use features like beeps when the ball is predicted to fall. Or hear voice telling you which diamond the ball is predicted to hit. So it's not just raw data and results - you can actually see and hear everything happening - all of the components of a spin that are predictable from the ball roll to diamond hots and ball bounce. A well made computer can easily predict these elements.

Regarding bankroll drawdowns, again if you have like a 150% edge, the maximum drawdown in typical situations may be 50 units. In my public demo video, it was a 93% hit rate covering 3 x neighbor bets, so a win on almost every spin. That was a 120% edge. Again roulette computers are an unfair comparison.  If you covered 3 x neighbor bets with a 120% edge, then your drawdown might be like 30 units which is 2 consecutive losses. Hardly relevant when you are winning 93% of spins.
"The only way to beat roulette is by increasing the accuracy of predictions"
Roulettephysics.com ← Professional roulette tips
Roulette-computers.com ← Hidden electronics that predicts the winning number
Roulettephysics.com/roulette-strategy ← Why most systems lose

-