I like the blocky look of Flatbetting graphs

[Nimo]

It's a bit less than the 1 unit per spin that I was hoping for, but in the end not a bad result for roughly 90 minutes of work. Goal was +500 units which it reached at spin 619.

FIrst test so not sure if it works long run, had a churn session the last $1000, but pulled through in the end, largest drawdown went from $4920 to $3880, at $10 units was 104 units. 

Going to try it with a real money test later and will posts results.

[Nimo]

Real money works, but at a slower pace as I expected.  For some reason, real money versus simulated I can always get a higher return with simulated accounts.  Anyway, the real money result is +526 units took 835 spins, FLAT BETTING.  There is a lot of churning, but it seems the result always goes up in the end.  Will try it with progression next.


So the "experts" said it's not good with progressions, so this is flatbetting; Check

The "experts" said it needs to be tested at least 10000 spins; In progress


I say it needs to be simple, so that minimal amount of tracking required: Check


Will post a progression chart soon, the 10000 spin chart and system once I'm done.

[Nimo]

Hi Nimo, it seems interesting what you found.
But they are a lot of balls to perform in a face-to-face casino.
Is real game rng or live or in person?
If it works flat, what do you want a progression for?
Another thing, why does 10,000 balls have to work to make it really a winner? It is not the same 100 sessions of 100 balls, for example?
Well I hope everything goes well and you get what you want, good night

I'm looking to see that it works flat for a long session, I want progression since if it works flat then with progression I will get my results much quicker, and this is RNG, I haven't tried it live, I want 300 spins per hour not 30-60.