Simple MM for BVNZ (even chances)

[monaco]

I've been curious to see if pure MM with a random v random bet selection could bring good results from a no zero wheel.


LEVEL 1
flatbet 1u to +/- 5

if +5, reset; if -5, go to LEVEL 2


LEVEL 2 (starting at -5)
flatbet 2u to -15 or -1

if -1, reset; if -15, go to LEVEL 3


LEVEL 3 (starting at -15)
flatbet 4u to -55 or -7

if -7, reset; if -55, go to LEVEL 4


LEVEL 4 (starting at -55)
flatbet 8u until -15

reset at -15



There is a possibilty for a LEVEL 5, taking into account the low limits at BV.

I know there's been recent threads discussing BV reading bet selections, so a random bet selection should show whether purely manipulating the amount of the bet within reasonable parameters could have an effect on the amount won/lost.

Would be a grind to play live, & the commission on Banker in baccarat & house edge in roulette would make it impossible i think.

More in a sec..

[VLS]

I've been curious to see if pure MM with a random v random bet selection could bring good results from a no zero wheel.

Hello dear Monaco,


If it's only for "curiosity purposes", you could try running a program for stripping zero (0) from your actuals library, making separate copies into another folder, for you to run a tester with this MM on them.


Cheers! 

[monaco]

Thanks Victor, I've had some help in tests from a couple of the guys here, and hopefully can put some results up.

It's held in numerous sessions, but the long-term? 

At the minute it's more curiosity, but it could prove helpful in some way..

cheers

[N1CKYYY]

Here are the results from 10 sessions:


[attach=1][attach=2][attach=4][attach=5][attach=6][attach=7][attach=3][attach=8][attach=9][attach=10]

[monaco]

For a mechanical negative progression, I think those numbers are ok (bets are made using 0.01c).

For example,
Session 1 - 10k spins, max drawdown from highest point - about 300u, end profit 400u.
Session 2 - 10k spins, max drawdown from highest point - about 300u, end profit 220u etc..

Lets look at the positives first 

80,000 spins, max drawdown 500u, total profit: 2690 units.

negatives -

Would Session 9 recover?


As far as negative progression go, I think it's a relatively stable option.
Ideally of course, we would've seen a 'the more you play, the more you win' upward trend in all 10 sessions.

If you find an edge in your bet selection, i think the MM would hold you in good stead also - it's relatively balanced, highest bet only 8u, & you would rarely need to go to that level.

[N1CKYYY]

Here are the results from TWO SESSIONS WITH 1 000 000 MILIONS of roulette random numbers.

[attach=1][attach=2]


My opinion of this system is that if you happen to catch the feeling of predicting what is going to be next EC you can come in plus most of the times even if lots of negative series happen because you are mostly using flat betting.

[Winner]

Here are the results from 10 sessions:


[attach=1][attach=2][attach=4][attach=5][attach=6][attach=7][attach=3][attach=8][attach=9][attach=10]

This is old but interesting