Do I have something special or? DOZEN STRAT ONE

[Apolloo]

Testing as usual and found this beautiful strategy. Think it’s something special but maybe I’m wrong.

1058 spins

225 total bets

Winning bets 87 === + 174 units
Losing bets 138  === - 138 units
Total profit === + 36 units

Dozen A + 5 units
Dozen B + 13 units
Dozen C + 18 units

Longest losing streak = 8 losses in a row


What you think? Is this unusual or do I need more testing. I would of surly expected

â€"- a longer losing streak?
â€"- a dozen to of lost flat betting?
â€"- less profit than +36 units flat betting

God if I played a ladder type progression it would be into mega profits. But I like the fact that just flat bets it’s a nice 36 units ahead.

Appreciate any response as I understand I’m not sharing my system and only offering to sell… as I’m honest and I don’t play for real nowadays I only create and test strategies because I’m one of the 99% who cannot stick to my own rules and guidelines 🙃

Thanks

[Apolloo]

Should I now….

test 5,000 spins playing on just 1 dozen?
Or
Test another 1000 spins on all 3 dozens?


Flat bet or ladder progression. I think just stick to flatbet and look at longest losing streaks and if get cluster of wins after long streaks of losses. But the stats from flat betting 5000 spins might be the best course of action.

Thanks

[daveylibra]

 Interesting, but an average of 3.6 units per 100 spins is quite a long slog!
Do you have a graph? Or can you tell me what was your lowest balance, if it went below 0?
Cheers
Dave

[TRD]

Went below zero!? That can happen on the first spin, I don't see the relevance. The question is max drawdown.

+200 bets .. you could just hit favorable variance. I'd say you need at least 2000 actual bets placed for something that resembles objective assessment.

[gianfrancopierino]

is it flat bet? whats the strategy? how can we tell you is a good strategy?

[daveylibra]

TRD, it would matter if you are gambling real money.. 💰

[TRD]

No, what I don't get is the premise stated ..

You're talking about the drawdown. What I am saying is .. that you drawdown, irrelevant of its size fof now aside, it can happen later in the session when the balance is higher, certain profits were made - thus nog going below zero, or straight at or somewhere near the beginning .. going below zero.

So, what exactly are you talking about.

In fact, every individual game to profit in a session goes below zero at first no-hit bet .. which can result in continuing the attack for a while more or recovery itself. In short, every first no-hit bet goes below zero.

So per future interactions, rather address the exact question / issue, rather than evading with 'something' instead.

[TRD]

I guess not .. ow well, not surprised.

[daveylibra]

Okay TRD, drawdown then, if you prefer. But I did say how far negative. I know we can be negative after the first bet...
But we still have no response from Apollo.