Kimo Li and a question to Steve

[Steve]

Steve i heared you are living in an old House from the 80's, is that true?

(People are telling it to prove that your Computers finally cant make the promised amount of money/results)

And who on Earth told you that garbage? Last I heard, I was living with my parents, next to a homeless hostel. I'm very poor.

You believe it?

[Kimo Li]

Edge can indeed be changed, by increasing the accuracy of predictions.

But what exactly does he mean by "high value targets"?

Hi Steve,

You know that social exercise corporations use as an experiment to show how information passed on from one person to another person in a group situation. At the end, what was said at the beginning is not the same in the end.

Let me clarify what my perspective of the edge refers to, the casino edge. High value targets, a term I use, are bet selections that hit on average 80%, eight out of ten attempts.

I do not know anything about your approach, except you use computers with some of your approaches. I believe our approach are like apples and oranges, different kinds of fruit, yet both belong to the same family, roulette family.

I apologize for other members interpretation.

Regards,
Kimo

[Steve]

I dont know...he is playing about 9 to 12 spins to make money.He first "calculates" when to play etc and then takes Advantage of a Situation and plays then this few spins.

That's pretty vague. I cant accurately comment on a strategy I don't know about. Again see link:s://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=26422 which applies to any system you're considering buying.

[Clf7]

Hahahahah ofc not man   

Its ridiculous people are jealous about your Computers etc etc and talking shit.It is sad because they are adult man.

[Steve]

High value targets, a term I use, are bet selections that hit on average 80%, eight out of ten attempts.

Whether or not that's better than "random bet selection" depends on exactly what you bet on. It's not enough for me to give a proper opinion on.

I do not know anything about your approach, except you use computers with some of your approaches

It's pretty simple in principle. Computers do what VB does, although with much higher accuracy. Although it depends on the computer. Most aren't much better than VB.

[Steve]

You know that social exercise corporations use as an experiment to show how information passed on from one person to another person in a group situation. At the end, what was said at the beginning is not the same in the end.

I know better than to rely on hearsay. Which is why I said I don't know enough to properly comment.

[Kimo Li]

I know better than to rely on hearsay. Which is why I said I don't know enough to properly comment.

I am in agreement. I did not post to explain any of my approaches, merely wanted to clarify what Clf7 had posted about the edge and high value targets.

[Kimo Li]

I dont know...he is playing about 9 to 12 spins to make money.He first "calculates" when to play etc and then takes Advantage of a Situation and plays then this few spins.

Exactly, you don't know. Clf7, please refrain from speculation. I would appreciate it.

[Clf7]

Ye sorry Kimo thats only what i heared from others, ofc i dont know(finally is not) whether it is true or not.I wanted only to know steves opinion and if he knows about it.Thats all.

[precogmiles]

Speaking from 10+ years of experience, the reality is:

1. Every system seller will probably have both genuine positive and negative reviews. A system can be genuinely great, but the user can be as thick as a brick (and naturally blame the system instead of themselves).

Also the system can be crap, but short term winnings may encourage buyers to give genuine positive reviews.

2. If there's an NDA, anyone with a bad experience will not respect the NDAs. So you'll probably only see negative reviews. The players that are happy DO respect the NDAs, and dont publish any feedback (including good feedback). And besides, happy players prefer keeping it to themselves. They aren't raving about a new car or something. They'd want to stay low key.

3. It is very common for sellers to publish fake positive reviews of themselves, and for sellers to publish fake negative reviews of competitors.

So can you trust reviews? Nope, unless you know the reviewer first-hand and know they're impartial AND credible. Anonymous reviews are almost completely useless.

If you want to know if a system being sold is legit or not, really you'll find this list useful: link:s://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=26422

I couldn’t agree more. Seems so obvious, I wonder why it’s so hard to understand.