A profitable lines method

[Blackboard]

First time poster here, primarily because I want to see other people testing this method and seeing if you get as good results as I have been getting. I am a long time player and have not posted on roulette forums before, but I want to bring this to the masses as I say, for more testing but also because it appears to actually generate consistent profits. Unlike a lot of people I am quite happy to share something that works and may we all make some nice coin from it!

The method takes elements of the pigeon hole theory, the birthday paradox and initially, Kimo Li's global pie method. However for ease of betting and having realised it doesn't seem to make any difference, I amended the global pie from 6 wheel sectors, to the 6 double streets, and this is where we focus our efforts.

The method:

We take the birthday paradox which tells us things have a habit of repeating within a fairly small range. We take the pigeonhole theory which tells us that if we have 10 pigeons and only 9 pigeon holes, one of the holes is going to have 2 birds in it.

The problem is we often see all 6 lines show up in consecutive order, so what good is it to say by the 7th spin one of them must appear twice? We cannot profit. So here's the best way I have been able to make this fit the theory:

We look at a maximum 13 spin session, and we are looking to find the line that will appear THREE times. Yes, we have the same problem as 6 lines appearing twice in 7 spins. However, thanks to variance, how often will we see all 6 lines appear twice in the first 12 spins? I don't know and if someone wants to run a million spins and tell us the answer that would be great. Or indeed how many times 5 lines appear twice in 11 spins and the other line once. What I do know is that so far, I have tested this hundreds of times and not see it happen once.

So we assume it is a very rare event. Ok, so how does this help? Well, what we are looking for is not ONE, but TWO of our lines to appear twice in the sequence before we bet. Seeing one line appear twice, especially quite early in the sequence, was no good as I found that quite often it doesn't appear the third time and we waste several units on it before our next line shows up twice. What works much better is, we get TWO lines that have hit twice. So already we are at spin 4 at least. Most times we will be at spin 6 or 7 by the time this happens.

We can now bet that these lines will hit a third time. So we bet 2 units. If we win, we gain 6 units for a 4 unit profit.

If we lose, we bet again but we also check, with the new number that landed, do we now have 3 lines appearing twice in our sequence? If we do, we also put a unit on the third line. If we win, we make overall profit of 1 unit.

If we lose, we bet again but double up to 2 units on each line. We check if our last result also means a 4th line has appeared twice. If so we can make a choice:

We either drop the furthest back line and focus on the 3 most recent ones, OR we bet all 4 and accept that a win will mean making a small loss. OR we bet all 4 and increase our units enough to profit should we get a hit. This really is down to personal choice and I would suggest the latter if we are playing with small unit sizes like £1. If we are playing £10 units, maybe play it safe. Of course I have seen it where I revert to my 3 newest lines that showed up twice, then the 4th one I dropped will hit. So I don't know if it's such a good idea to do that really, after all the aim is to find the line that is going to hit 3 times in the sequence.

If we lose again, for me personally this is the time I stop betting that sequence. There is no point covering 5 lines at this stage, the return is too low. I will start a new game and double my unit size next time. I have found that it is very rare we lose in this situation, so when it does happen we can be very confident it won't happen a 2nd time for a while. We should therefore be able to make our loss back fairly easily with increased unit size.

BUT OF COURSE THIS IS THE RISK TO THE METHOD. Nothing is infallible!! However in my hundreds of tests I am yet to see a bad run like this twice close together. You could probably just carry on with the same unit size and recover but with a good bankroll you should be good to increase it.

Another situation you might see, when you cover 3 of the lines - you get a loss, but the new number does not trigger a 4th line to be added next time. In this case I tend to play again and double up, and if I lose again this is my stop loss. Again I have noticed that it is rare to lose again - you'd think it is just an even chance bet, right? But it wins a lot - because of the variance and because we are nearing the end of our 13 spin sequence. It is very rare no line has appeared 3 times by spin 10 so we have more confidence to get that hit than if we just bet red or black.

So you can win between 1 and 4 units on each sequence, losses or stop loss point being reached is very rare and is recoverable. I tested this many times and using £10 units I was able to reach £300 or 30 units, usually around about 100 spins in (this includes all the spins where we are not betting but waiting for our 2 lines to appear twice in a sequence).

OTHER THINGS TO NOTE:

If a zero appears while we are waiting for our 2 lines to hit twice, we just ignore it. Like, don't even count it as one of the spins for the sequence. Completely ignore it.

If zero hits while we are betting, I persoanlly find  this really irritating because we don't count it as part of the sequence but we still incur a loss as a result. For that reason I now put a unit on zero. If I am betting £10 units I'll put 50p on it, or if I am covering 3 lines I put £1 on it, or £2 if I have doubled up, etc. It does eat into profit a bit but who cares? When you can make £300 in an hour like I did this morning, are you going to care that it could have been £315 or whatever, because you lost units on the zero and it never hit while you were betting? Who cares. But on lower unit wagering you might just choose to leave it uncovered.

What happens if the SAME LINE appears 3 times before the 2nd line has appeared twice? You should start again. Yes it's annoying, but the sequence is already done, if you carry on and wait for another line to show up twice then play them both, you run the risk of several losing spins. I found this out in testing and realised it is much better to start over. Online you can just jump from wheel to wheel, as you may be able to do in a casino too. I usually look at the last 3 or 4 numbers to see if I have a nice spread. Let's say the marquee shows in the last 4 spins, we have 4 different lines hitting. I will join and that 4th spin back will be my starting point, so we can save some time this way.

It does seem to be extremely good when we see 5 or even all 6 lines show up at the start of our sequence. If we need 8 spins to get 2 lines showing twice we are pretty much nailed on to win within then next 3 spins. I see this more often than you might think but it isn't regular enough to ONLY play this way, too much waiting.

Similarly if I see my 2 lines appearing twice in the first 4 spins, I might choose not to play this. It can win, as you get a hot line that comes in again, but for me I would prefer to at least be on spin 6 or 7 before I start wagering.

The KEY to this method is to keep losses reasonable when the odd bad sequence appears. DO NOT keep doubling and trebling up and be betting £100 on 5 lines and £20 on zero. Accept a reasonable loss and increase the unit size for the next couple of games. All in all you should see an upward trajectory.

All my testing has been positive, apart from where I have flouted one of the above rules. My first real play today as I said, netted me £300 and I am sure I could have kept going for more.

I want people to try this and see what sort of results you get, and comment here. I really hope I have discovered a consistent winner that, while it can suffer losses, does not do so often and recovers sufficiently that it isn't a problem. If that is the case then....well, we are all in luck, no?