• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Odds and payouts are different things. If either the odds or payouts don't change, then the result is the same - eventual loss.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

Boost Your Self-Esteem by Priyanka Gupta

Started by praline, Jul 23, 07:44 AM 2024

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

What should I do?

Forget and live my live.
Post private info and go to jail were I will have plenty of time to continue with my roulette studies.
Continue my roulette journey
None of the above
Post private info without going to jail

Tobacco Vanille

Quote from: TRD on Aug 03, 07:41 PM 2024Tobacco Vanille, what's S & D?

23 doz 2
15 doz 2
---------
20 doz 2 (s)
---------
19 doz 2 (s) 
---------
15 doz 2 (s) S123 on the AP progression

29 doz 3
11 doz 1
29 doz 3
------------
15 doz 2
20 doz 2 (D)
-------------
27 doz 3
32 doz 3 (D)
--------------
10 doz 1
12 doz 1 (D) D123 on the AP progression

To get a higher concentration of S rather than D, you need to get more groupings of either 1, 2 or 3.
They don't HAVE to be the actual dozens themselves. You have to manafucture them yourself. That's why I said I don't believe that the Cycles or the AP progression work out of the box. You need to create the environment to make them work. But the kicker is that if you can do that, then you don't even really need them although admittedly they can act as a signal (especially the S123) as to when you are in profitable situations.

I hope that helps you TRD.

Cheers


Tobacco Vanille

So basically, S = Same

D = Different

*Sorry about the duplicate post, not sure what happened there!

Tobacco Vanille

As an example from a game today.

actual numbers themselves converted to their respective dozens.

3
3
--
2
3
--
1
3
--
3
--
2
1
3
--
2
3
--
2
2
--
3
1
3
--
1
1
--
1
--
1
--
2
2
--
3
1
2
--
2
--
3
3
--
3
--
2

That wasn't bad for producing some S in the cycles. However, as far as concentrated groupings go, there was 4 consecutive 1's and 3 consecutive 3's.

Now for one of my derived streams.

1
2
1
--
1
1
--
3
1
--
1
--
1
--
1
--
3
3
--
3
--
1
1
--
1
--
1
--
3
1
--
2
1
--
1
--
1
--
2
1
--
1
--
1
--
1
--
2
1
--
2

and so a much better result for the S and a lot more consecutive groupings to get stuck into.

One of the interesting aspects of Baccarat is what's known as the derived roads. All they basically are is additional streams but then it's how you can frame the streams to manipulate them for your own purposes which is where someone could be looking to benefit from them.

Again, it took me a long time to figure a lot of this stuff out. Years actually and if I typed everything out, it would take days to type it and then days to explain the nuances and I sometimes think that unless someone goes through that process themself, they are never really going to get a true understanding or the full picture of it.

A) I don't have the time for all that and B) I don't want someone going of half baked thinking they have the grail and are totally unprepared because it takes some getting used to in a live casino environment.

On saying that, I sincerely hope I have a given a bit of an outline and I am sure it can help a few of you.

Cheers

ᶦ ᵃᵐ|Ä-łëx

You can turn things as said on other topic into half.
This is for dozen so you either bet 1, 2 or not bet for dozens for the AP is recalculated again .


ᶦ ᵃᵐ|Ä-łëx


ᶦ ᵃᵐ|Ä-łëx

One of the AP will repeat also!

Rond1nell1x

Hi, I believe that if we combine 2 or more partitions (DS, DZ, EC) intelligently to attack a dz cycle or a Ds cycle we can create some advantage. But I haven't been able to do that yet. I believe the secret is that it can't be anything static, but rather something mobile that changes according to what's happening in the cycle.

Priyanka, I shared in the Random Thoughts thread that the dozen that closed the previous cycle will close the current cycle by an average of 62%. This is always using the last DZ of the cycle as the first of the current cycle.

In a test with a flat bet, I waited to close the first cycle and bet flat on the DZ that closed the previous cycle until the current cycle closed. And I restarted the attack with the dz of the second cycle and did this for 81 spins. It reached -14 and returned to +1.

This is certainly not a winning attack, but I believe we can use this combined with something to make an effective attack.

I just wanted to share it to see if any ideas come up here.
"We don't have to be smarter than the rest. We have to be more disciplined than the rest."
— Warren Buffett

MoneyT101

Quote from: Rond1nell1x on Aug 04, 09:23 PM 2024I just wanted to share it to see if any ideas come up here.

I'm trying to let this topic get buried because of the personal info posted about members.  I'll respond to you in my new topic and we can keep the conversation going there if you don't mind
Simple once you get it!  Chased all the pigeons away and they were already in their hole

Blueprint

My quote doesn't work but...

"The fact is things do clutter. When they do clutter, repeaters do happen. When repeaters do happen the statistical relation between these finite cycles tend to lean towards and form a magical relation between two finite cycles."

Every little thing she does is magic.

-