Help test!

[GLC]

For all members new and old,

I think the most valuable input any of us have for any of the systems is to test a few sessions and post the results for other's benefit.

If we get 5 or 6 members to test even 2 or 3 times, we can get some valuable info.

Usually, we need to get 20 reasonable sessions tested to get an idea as to whether or not a system is worth pursuing.

It would be easy if we could get say 10 people to commit to 2 sessions and post the results.  If we get a very positive result, we could do another 10 to 20 sessions which would give us a really solid foundation to move forward.

Of course, if you put out a system that's so complicated that it takes hours and hours just to figure out how to play it, or a session takes hundreds of spins of tracking plus playing, then probably the best thing is for the author to publish a reasonable number of sessions to get the juices flowing.

Another idea is that if you post a system under the "Full Systems" heading, you must have played  ?10? sessions and still be well ahead or else you should start it under "Notepad" or something.

Then, if it reaches the level of a full system and testing shows it to be at least a reasonable winner, the author can condense all the pertinent info from the original topic and move it to the "Full Systems" category.

As a final thought, we could give the system a grade like A-B-C-D-F or maybe from 1-100 reflecting how effective we think the system is.

Just some ideas to help us be a little more organized.

Regards,

George