Birds of a Feather

[keel44]

Hi keel, for my part, i'll continue to test, using a 4 or 5 number progression for 20 spins.
that will be my stop-loss.

as george said earlier up the thread, would you prefer it if this information went on a different thread, so this thread was kept for your method?

cheers.

I think you should definitely keep it here on this thread only if you want to.  I will take a backseat now and I will test on my own and keep you guys up to date.

Keel

[GLC]

Hi Guys.

I've been following this thread and looks like you have a nice system going on here.

Here is a link  for a handy little progression tool. Maybe it will be of some use.

link:://:.loothog.com/Systems/prog.html



Furple,

Thanks for the progression tool.  It surely does save time figuring it manually.

G.

[Wally Gator]

I'm going to start testing this as well.

Furple, nice link.  Thanks !!

[ewarwoowar]

10 more sessions tested, results not as good 

same criteria as above. tests done using my recorded live spins from dublinbet.

session 1:
number group LBO
spins 2
profit 28 units

session 2:
number group LBE
spins 1
profit 31 units

session 3:
number group LBO
spins 20 *lost progression*
profit  -200 units

session 4:
number group LBE
spins 20 *lost progression*
profit  -385 units

session 5:
number group LRO
spins 4
profit 16 units

session 6:
number group LRE
spins 12
profit 4 units

session 7:
number group HBE
spins 2
profit 26 units

session 8:
number group LBO
spins 3
profit 21 units

session 9:
number group LRE
spins 13
profit 28 units

session 10:
number group LRE
spins 20 *lost progression*
profit  -200 units.

as george said, it had to happen!

[GLC]

Okay, so we can see that betting straight-up with a progression is a little too risky.  That doesn't mean nothing will work.  Some of Keel's suggestions may be the tweak we need.  Let's not give up too soon.

G

[ewarwoowar]

totally agreed george, there's a lot of merit in the thinking behind the system.
a tweak or two should help, i'm sure.

cheers.