The Ultimate Matrix System

[dino246]

Hi GLC, watching your system with GREAT interest here in the UK.  Keep the informative posts going !!!! Cheers,Dino.

[GLC]

Hi GLC, watching your system with GREAT interest here in the UK.  Keep the informative posts going !!!! Cheers,Dino.

Dino,

Thanks for your interest.  I must inform you that the last couple of sessions I have played with the new bet method have resulted in my being in a negative situation for the entire 120 spins.  I even added another 50 spins and still couldn't get out of the hole.

My conclusion on this system is that it is not, I repeat not, any better than dozens of other systems you'll see posted on this forum.  I'm not saying that you can't win with this system, but you have to set a stop loss and when you reach it, just take the loss and start over.  Otherwise you can be floundering for quite a while trying to recover from a bad start and then a mediocre session.

Sorry,  it did look promising in the beginning, of course they all do or we wouldn't continue working on them, but it's not what I'm looking for.  Can be too much of a grind, and too explosive at times.

Good luck to you,

George

[GLC]

I know not everyone will  agree with me on this, but I don't think putting our spins in matrices adds anything to our bet selection accuracy.

Maybe JohnLegend's on to something, but the ones I have tried don't really perform any better than just straight forward dozen selection methods.

The perception distorter is waiting long periods of spins for a trigger and then betting once.  It feels like we're winning because our systems do win 95% of the time.  It's those 5%er's that take it all back.  And it can take a long time to hit a 5%er.

Having said that.  I'm off to another system to test.  Wish me luck.

Geo

[Proofreaders2000]

"The perception distorter is waiting long periods of spins for a trigger and then betting once.  It feels like we're winning because our systems do win 95% of the time.  It's those 5%er's that take it all back.  And it can take a long time to hit a 5%er."-GLC

About waiting long periods...an idea came to me.  Break the session into blocks of time and record you progress on paper.  Then later start again where you left off.  If the system's a winner, it should still win, right?

[Tomla021]

well good luck ,,, good knowing your always on the prowl for a new method

[GLC]

About waiting long periods...an idea came to me.  Break the session into blocks of time and record you progress on paper.  Then later start again where you left off.  If the system's a winner, it should still win, right?

Proof,

Can you please give more detail regarding what you're talking about with this idea?

Thanks

[GLC]

Well good luck ,,, good knowing your always on the prowl for a new method

Tom,

I'm starting to feel a little prowled out at the moment.  I may take a breather from systems and work on my airball machine footprint.

link:://rouletteforum.cc/general-discussion/the-need-for-experience/15/

Read my last couple of posts here and you'll see what I mean.

[Proofreaders2000]

Say for instance divide your sessions into 20 minute portions, record your progress on paper (if nothing else, record the spin values for that time period) organize those spins into potential triggers, (what the system recognizes) set up for the next 20 minute session and continue with the newest spin (as if you never left.)

This I found useful for systems like Winkel's GUT (where you needed 30 spin values or more to oftimes get a trigger).