An open letter to all members or guests that have a BetVoyager account.

[ThomasGrant]

BetVoyager mutually exclusive bets
BetVoyager mutually exclusive bets

[ThomasGrant]

THOMAS

I'm seriously wondering if they've made these changes because of the bots.

You took an awful lot of money from them a while back -- I clearly recall your regular updates on your amazing progress!   

Lots of other bots with the "right" settings (the secret to success) will also be sucking in the casino's cash.

They're not going to tolerate that sort of haemorrhaging indefinitely.

So in a classic pincer movement they've:

* cut out the free spins (bots rely on those)

* messed around with limits (makes the bots' progressions less viable)

To every attack there's a counter-attack...and they've done it in spades. And I predict more upsets to follow...   

I disagree.
This is just a recent thing.
I have been using bots at BV for ages now.
I know I have won money over there.
But I fail to see the logic in this decision.
I have posted a video on youtube.
Asking anyone with an account at BV to email them.
And see if we can remove this new policy.

I like FREE spins.

[esoito]

We'll agree to disagree, then.

If you think the bots have nothing to do with their decision then, in your opinion, what other reasons might they have for making these unwelcome changes?

[chrisbis]

Gentlemen.

Shall we wait for the answer(s) to the question(s), I will pose to the nice lady from B V then?

Otherwise, Ur just going to ding-dong between Urselves, and get no-where.

@Thomas

Atlantis has shown how to get free spins with the Variation bet he has 'Designed'.

Use it mate.

Should be easy enough to code, and then U could use at other casino's, just change the cent/penny amount.

1.5@Low
0.5@Line4 (19-24)
1@Doz 3

Which is the same as
3@ Low
1@ Line4
2@ Doz3



@esoito

I think the changes where made because of a combination of things.
It does, I agree, seem like a rushed decision, and with  little, or no consideration for players World Wide.

I see no reason for U to agree or dis-agree.

We have no answers yet, for either of u to base any thoughts on, and, as has been said before
'bots' have been around for years, so I don't think it 'bots' per-say, but it maybe, that they fore-saw that a particular 'bet' was getting  "A little too close for comfort"!!

Lets see how the answers turn out.

That's assuming, I get answers...............
she may just be on a marketing field trip excursion/exercise,
and is not the 'bod' we need to further our cause.

Feed back soon I hope, to U, and the whole Forum, on this subject.

[esoito]

@Chris

So rather than simply speculate about bots please ask them outright if the changes they are making is anything to do with bots.

You might even be told the truth...

[ThomasGrant]

Bugger...
I thought if they got enough emails.
They might. Just might reconsider this.
But it does not look like it.

[Colbster]

I sent my email this morning expressing my great disappointment  .  Still a great casino!  I have been playing 2 units on 2 dozens, 1 unit on each of the double streets in the 3rd dozen.  6 units bet, 6 units returned on the no-zero table.  Still works fine, just a bit of a hassle.