• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Test the accuracy of your method to predict the winning number. If it works, then your system works. But tests over a few hundred spins tell you nothing.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

Ok, just to see how it goes

Started by soggett, Apr 15, 09:21 AM 2011

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

soggett

Hy everybody  ^-^

Ok, so I remembered a system I saw somewhere and decided to test it to see how it goes

The system:
Put 10 units on 1st and 3rd dozen, 1 unit on 7 numbers in between ( in dozen 2 all blacks and a number of your choice, mine was 21).
Spin

So to test it properly I went to BV and autospun it 1000 times.

The results?

Profit of +201 units

Now that isn't what I wanted to tell you.

In that 1000 spins we lost 112 times.
This system needs a progression and it could be very solid

the numbers:
lost once in a row: 95
lost twice in a row:15
lost 3 times in a row: 2

that's it, no 4 times.

If we can cover step 1 and 2 we can take the loss from step 3 and move on.

On a win you win ~ 6 units.
On a lose you lose 27.

without covering the seventh number (in my case 21) the numbers are:

Lost once in a row: 106
Lost twice in a row:20
Lost 3 times in a row:5

They are similar so maybe we can bet 6 numbers and get a bigger profit per win?


What do you guys think?
Some suggestions on progression?
Any thought is appreciated


Thanks


P.S. I played on BetVoyager No zero wheel
To beat the game you first have to realise you can't beat the game - then comes the hard part

Proofreaders2000

Truth be told, if you are ahead flat-betting, you do not need a progression.

If you want one however, try adding 2 units on the dozens for every miss and reduce one unit on dozens on a win.

soggett

Thanks

I was thinking of only one step as it is the most repeted
That way we could make more money and risk less
will have to do some numbers though
To beat the game you first have to realise you can't beat the game - then comes the hard part

soggett

The problem here with flat betting is that it went from +300 to -300 and then it stopped at +201.
It could have gone anywhere
For a progression I think we have to have a big BR and we risk a lot to win a little, it's no good
I'll think it over some more,but I think it's not very good after all
To beat the game you first have to realise you can't beat the game - then comes the hard part

GLC

Look at my money mgmt system 'Clean up before move up".
If you lose 27 on a loss and win 6 on a win, when you lose write down nine 3's and double your bet size.  Each win you cross off 4 3's.  Three wins and you're up 9 units.  Drop back down to base bet until lose again.
If you lose before recovering after a loss, just write down the number of units to recover and continue betting double your base bet until you recover from your first loss.  Then you in rease your bet to three times base bet to recover all losses at second level. 
When you recover all, drop back to base bet.
This is very efficient recovery system for any bet method.
In my case it doesn't matter.  I'm both!

Tomla021

played it for fun online w double zero--lots of fun ,,, might test it a bit
"No Whining, just Winning"

-