Lucy's Static System

[LuckyLucy]

This is my first system and although a little basic and not comparible with some of the great systems on here I like it so far and would love it if someone could run a large spin test on it for me, ok here goes:

[felt]
2@DS3
1@DS4
1@DS5
1@DS6
2@H
[/felt]

OK I realise the weak spot it is clearly obvious 0 (if not playing at BV) and 1-12, when then come in you lose 7 chips. I have countered this by having two chips on 19-36, which means that on 13-18 you make a nice 5 chip profit and on 19-36 you will make a 3 chip profit.

Its my first system so go easy on me please and of course I'm always open to your suggestions and critique

Thank you!

Lucy

Suplimental:

If you feel the 7 chips is a little high a wager to risk, you can always change it to this:


[felt]
1@DS3
1@DS4
1@DS5
1@DS6
1@H
[/felt]

This reduces your chip outlay, but obviously lessens your profits when those lovely wins come in.

[Johnlegend]

This is my first system and although a little basic and not comparible with some of the great systems on here I like it so far and would love it if someone could run a large spin test on it for me, ok here goes:

[felt]
2@DS3
1@DS4
1@DS5
1@DS6
2@H
[/felt]

OK I realise the weak spot it is clearly obvious 0 (if not playing at BV) and 1-12, when then come in you lose 7 chips. I have countered this by having two chips on 19-36, which means that on 13-18 you make a nice 5 chip profit and on 19-36 you will make a 3 chip profit.

Its my first system so go easy on me please and of course I'm always open to your suggestions and critique

Thank you!

Lucy

Suplimental:

If you feel the 7 chips is a little high a wager to risk, you can always change it to this:


[felt]
1@DS3
1@DS4
1@DS5
1@DS6
1@H
[/felt]

This reduces your chip outlay, but obviously lessens your profits when those lovely wins come in.

Well done Lucy is there any Trigger. Or do you just always lay your chips on the same spots? I think if you have a trigger of at least two consecutive hits on DOZEN 1 the method becomes stronger. Im a fan of line (DOUBLE STREET METHODS) Theyre as close as I will get to the inside.

[LuckyLucy]

Hi John

I hadnt thought of that, but that is a sweet idea. I had it in mind as a fixed system, but as you say with waiting for two hits in the 1st dozen would make it a much more solid system thank you

[Johnlegend]

Hi John

I hadnt thought of that, but that is a sweet idea. I had it in mind as a fixed system, but as you say with waiting for two hits in the 1st dozen would make it a much more solid system thank you

Yes, I only say this as in my 16 years as a player I have seen some scary streaks on a single dozen with a zero interrupting it. If you can imagine a streak like this--12,7,7,10,6,4,0,1,3. They can and do happen. I once met a chap in a casino. His method was to wait for the ball to hit a dozen then bet against it hitting that dozen 6 consecutive times in a row using this progression.
1,1,--3,3,--9,9,--27,27,--81,81----He won so many times he began to believe this straight off the layout method was invincible. When I met him one day in the bar, he was drowning his sorrows. I asked him what had happened. He said he lost his progression 3 times that evening. Curtesy of 5 of the same dozen plus a zero. THREE TIMES. I have more or less seen it all Lucy in my experience. That is why we have to look at extreme ways of breaking up randoms flow. With the Matrix and Pattern Breakers concepts. And CODE concept.
But you are applauded for trying. If I were going to play your idea I woud wait for at least 5 of the same dozen. Then bet with a 4 step progression. that would give you an excellent chance of making a profit. Hit and Run of course. All players who live at the table, die at the table. Always remember that.

[Drazen]

Yes, I only say this as in my 16 years as a player I have seen some scary streaks on a single dozen with a zero interrupting it. If you can imagine a streak like this--12,7,7,10,6,4,0,1,3. They can and do happen. I once met a chap in a casino. His method was to wait for the ball to hit a dozen then bet against it hitting that dozen 6 consecutive times in a row using this progression.
1,1,--3,3,--9,9,--27,27,--81,81----He won so many times he began to believe this straight off the layout method was invincible. When I met him one day in the bar, he was drowning his sorrows. I asked him what had happened. He said he lost his progression 3 times that evening. Curtesy of 5 of the same dozen plus a zero. THREE TIMES. I have more or less seen it all Lucy in my experience. That is why we have to look at extreme ways of breaking up randoms flow. With the Matrix and Pattern Breakers concepts. And CODE concept.
But you are applauded for trying. If I were going to play your idea I woud wait for at least 5 of the same dozen. Then bet with a 4 step progression. that would give you an excellent chance of making a profit. Hit and Run of course. All players who live at the table, die at the table. Always remember that.

Please dont get me wrong dear John, just an observation. It is so strange to see you posting in some thread that is not yours, or that hasnt anything with matrix concept  I think that is rare in you case. 

Anyway, i agree  with you, and that chap you mentioned doesnt know too much about roulette when he played that, especialy with that progression. That is actualy like martingale for double dozens... And if you ask me, martingale can exist and win only in newbies fantasy... That thing killed more people than two world wars together 

Regards

Drazen

[Johnlegend]

Drazen Hello if I feel I can be of some help, I will venture onto anothers thread. I don't think you are being totally fair there If its good and I feel it works. I will be there. AMKS CODE 4 isnt mine but its out of this world. Scoobies DIVIDE AND CONQUER isnt mine but its another great one.

What I look for is methods that are workable, profittable and realistic in terms of outlay. So that's how I look at things. Well you say that about that progression. I would argue it depends on the METHOD. PUT THAT PROGRESSION ON CODE 4 AND WELL. You may have a 10,000/1 strikerate. Its all relative Drazen Cro. ALL RELATIVE...

[Drazen]

I don't think you are being totally fair there

Dear John, i said yours or that has any matrix concept. (doesnt have to be yours, but as long it is based on matrices) And all these you counted are based on matrices, right? In other words i just said you like matrices a lot.

There are also other good systems here, not based on matrices, and i honestly didnt saw you testing or discussing. ( i apologize if that is maybe so) But every has his opinion and i respect it.

I agree that all is relative. Of course i was saying about marty in terms of play that chap played...

Regards

Drazen

[Johnlegend]

Dear John, I said yours or that has any matrix concept. (doesn't have to be yours, but as long it is based on matrices) And all these you counted are based on matrices, right? In other words I just said you like matrices a lot.

There are also other good systems here, not based on matrices, and I honestly didn't saw you testing or discussing. ( I apologize if that is maybe so) But every has his opinion and I respect it.

I agree that all is relative. Of course I was saying about marty in terms of play that chap played...

Regards

Drazen

It works Drazen that's the bottom line. Bring me any method that is simple and can turnover its progression by around double the risk and I will look at it. Some systems try to be too clever for their own good.

And you end up having to spend ages just learning it. Code 4 is simple yet a stroke of genius. It can be understood by a newbie. And used on more than one format.

If anyone has a better method for an 80 unit risk that can be applied as easily I'm ready to see it. I don't like admitting someone has a better method than mine, I am competitive and driven. But when I see one that ticks all my boxes. I will be the first one to congratulate them.

AMK has the best method on the forum in terms of risk, time and strikerate as far as I am concerned. I believe THE MATRIX SLIDE could rival it especially with a 4 step progression but its too soon to tell.

a lot of methods I see on here I know will fall as soon as I read their parameters. If you have a method Drazen you think is better than CODE 4 alround direct me to it....

[Drazen]

I know they are good. And my intetion wasnt to discuss about them here 

Anyway i regard your way for making things easy, especialy for new players, and trying to make method that doesnt asks some big baknrol.

Regards

Drazen

[iggiv]

Lucy, it is not gonna work "as it is". you leave one dozen uncovered and there will be freak runs when this dozen will hit many times in a row and you will lose your bankroll. it is just your thought that this is unlikely
to happen frequently, but if you employ this system frequently enough you will encounter this no doubt frequently enough to make you lose.
and in a few runs you will lose all your winnings and more than this.


u need something more complex. and also i would advice to look at hot streets. and to go further I would say don't limit yourself by streets only, look also at single numbers, look at different bet selections. Using the same bet selection (example the same streets, or the hot streets all the time) -- is asking for a trouble. remember, what is unlikely to happen after 2 runs is very likely to happen after 20 or 30 or 100 spins, and it will happen a few times, not only one.


i advice you this (though it is a bit no-woman allegory) : imagine yourself fighting on a box ring a strong very clever never tired enemy (this is roulette) , which looks sometimes in the beginning like a real unintelligent and lets  you beat him up at first rounds. and you start thinking he is weak and no one to worry about. But he looks at your movements. after a few rounds, studying your movements and your style he is gonna nock you out big time.

the conclusion: you must change your tactics consistently. No uncovered streets. not even one consistently uncovered number. after a few rounds (i mean after a while -- 30 or 40 or 100 --whatever (total) spins of your play) he is gonna give you very a hard blow RIGHT THERE. to your uncovered street.

[ZeroBlue]

It works Drazen that's the bottom line. Bring me any method that is simple and can turnover its progression by around double the risk and I will look at it. Some systems try to be too clever for their own good.

And you end up having to spend ages just learning it. Code 4 is simple yet a stroke of genius. It can be understood by a newbie. And used on more than one format.

If anyone has a better method for an 80 unit risk that can be applied as easily I'm ready to see it. I don't like admitting someone has a better method than mine, I am competitive and driven. But when I see one that ticks all my boxes. I will be the first one to congratulate them.

AMK has the best method on the forum in terms of risk, time and strikerate as far as I am concerned. I believe THE MATRIX SLIDE could rival it especially with a 4 step progression but its too soon to tell.

a lot of methods I see on here I know will fall as soon as I read their parameters. If you have a method Drazen you think is better than CODE 4 alround direct me to it....

i can refer several to you dear john.
for 80 chips and less.

[chrisbis]

That's a great line, right there Iggv, nice one:-

he is gonna give you very a hard blow RIGHT THERE. to your uncovered street.

beautifully put..........