Plagerized System From MrJ

[GLC]

Hello All,

If this system turns out to be any good, MrJ gets all the credit because it was conceived by reading many of his excellent systems.

If this system turns out to be a bust, I'll take all the blame.  Therefore, test well before risking any real money.

This system is based on MrJ's method of betting on straight-up numbers and then crossing off numbers without betting for a couple of spins, then betting again, etc...

His latest system has to do with betting 2 numbers based on their locations on the 0/00 wheel.  I decided to try a system based on betting any 4 numbers that haven't hit.

Those familiar with his systems will find this very straight forward.

I bet on 4 numbers that have not hit.  I have no favorites, so I begin with 1,2,3,4.  My progression is such that any hit leaves me with a positive balance, and starting a new game.

If I miss, I cross off the number just spun and the next four spins, no bets just cross off.  I bet on the 6th spin my four numbers.  If one or more of them hit during the 4 non-bet spins, I just bet the 4 lowest numbers that haven't hit.  I continue to bet this way until I have 4 unhit numbers.  (Zeros play just like any other number).  When down to only 4 numbers, bet them every time until one of them hits.

I use a 27 step progression. 4 units bet 8 times, 8 units bet 4 times, 12 units 3Xs, 16 units 2xs, 20 - 2xs, 24,28,32,36,40,44,48 and 56 units 1X for a total bank of 480 units if you lose all 27 bets.

A win nets anywhere from 4 units to 32 units depending on where you hit in the progression.

You can only have a total of 131 spins to either win or lose.

I have played a total of 20 games for a total win of 400 units.  The highest bet made was 20 units with a win on the 18th bet.  Most wins were at 8 or 4 unit bets.

Of course it can lose.  In 20 games, I have not won enough to cover even I loss, but who knows, I could win another 20 games without a loss.  As with all systems, the winners are the ones that win more when the winning games are totalled than they lose on the losing games.

I tested it briefly, 5 games with 3 numbers and 3 cross-off spins and won those games also.  It probably works with any set of numbers.  Ken's 2 numbers bet and 2 spins for cross-off may be the optimum numbers, but if that's the case, Ken, why isn't 1 number with 1 cross-off spin between bets better?

Okay, have at it.  I'll keep testing.  As with all of Ken's systems, you have to have a boat load of patience and time and bankroll.  Your units can be whatever you can afford depending on the table limits.

Cheers,

George

[VLS]

If this system turns out to be any good, MrJ gets all the credit because it was conceived by reading many of his excellent systems.

If this system turns out to be a bust, I'll take all the blame.

Well, this is noble on your part dear GLC.

May it hold up and Mr.J get his credit... in such a case, everybody wins, since the community also gets a decent method

Kind regards and thanks for sharing.

[MrJ]

"His latest system has to do with betting 2 numbers based on their locations on the 0/00 wheel.  I decided to try a system based on betting any 4 numbers that haven't hit" >>> Yeah, I do recommend the 2 numbers, only my opinion. Why not bet only ONE number you asked? Did that already. I did testing of one and three numbers (and of course two numbers). In terms of results, the TWO number version lasted longer. Of all methods I ever tested/played, TWO numbers always worked out better. Why? I have no idea. lol Ken

[MrJ]

I'll post my version #2 for this.  Ken

[GLC]

"His latest system has to do with betting 2 numbers based on their locations on the 0/00 wheel.  I decided to try a system based on betting any 4 numbers that haven't hit" >>> Yeah, I do recommend the 2 numbers, only my opinion. Why not bet only ONE number you asked? Did that already. I did testing of one and three numbers (and of course two numbers). In terms of results, the TWO number version lasted longer. Of all methods I ever tested/played, TWO numbers always worked out better. Why? I have no idea. LoL Ken

Thanks Ken,

After playing a few more rounds with both 4 numbers and 2 numbers, I am going to have to agree with you.  For whatever reason, the 2 number method does seem to perform better.  Waiting 4 spins without betting sees too many of your numbers hit with no money on them.  Somewhat discouraging.

My thinking was that by betting 4 numbers you are shooting at a wider target, so easier to hit.  The problem is that the progression climbs at a pretty rapid clip with fewer chances for a hit.

Thanks for your continued contributions.

George