• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Almost every system has been tested many times before. Start by learning what we already know doesn't work, and why.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

LAMBS FOR THE SHEARING

Started by F_LAT_INO, Aug 20, 02:25 PM 2010

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

iggiv

F_LAT_INO,

i think you're a good and kind man and care about others. But a problem with you (IMHO)  is you're too  JUMPY in your conclusions. U hardly tolerate other people opinions when they contradict yours. And those opinions you count as personal insults of a kind. Even if they have nothing to do with your personality. So you mix in your mind roulette approach of some people and their personal behaviour. Like that: " this  guy says my methods are not good and can't win, he does it because all he wants to do is just to disturb me and others playing roulette, he wants to create troubles for us, he does not want to contribute to this forum etc"
this is a big mistake of yours. This way you don't help to defeat the game, on the contrary this approach to discussion creates quarrels. People start pointing fingers at each other, and blaming each other. That's how good discussions turn into fight.

I know it is not your purpose, I am sure that you wanna help people and you're convinced that
u know how. The problem is some other people think the same and you cannot convince them start thinking like you and agree with you in everything.

our problem is that people can't put up with other opinions. So why not put aside just blaming people and let's keep arguing with them ONLY ON ROULETTE METHODS, without finger- pointing at their behaviour.

U think Bayes' approach to the game  is wrong? Show please exactly where he is wrong .
But please stop saying "U don't contribute to this forum". It is too easy to say it to too many people here. I got some of the sort from you too. And some more.

So let's stop it right there, my friend.
I am sure we can get along fine if we want to.

iggiv

about Victor's software. Free sessions and then one dollar for a session is nothing to pay even if u lost. Play small units.  If u lose 3 sessions in a row, c'mon, forget about it,  u lost some pennies, u lost 3 bucks.

this is a win-win or lose-lose situation. if we win we all win including Victor and then we can win big. If we lose we lose very little. Except Victor himself losing time. but we won't lose much money on it.

Twisteruk

Very Well Said iggiv  :thumbsup:

We can bet 1p/1c units on Victors free trial and if we lose, as you say, its pennies

The only person that will "lose" is Victor for the amount of time and effort he is putting into this Service if it doesnt work as he intends it to

Anyway lets wait and hope Victor is as good as most of us think he is  :thumbsup:
Its Set In Stone =)

Jordan

iggiv I agree 100% with U.

GARNabby

Quote from: Bayes on Aug 22, 03:24 AM 2010And why didn't you point this out to Twisteruk when he asked you to be more specific? all you said was "we are all adults and can read between the lines"  ???


The scammers tend to be literally "between the lines"... in every other reply in every other thread.

GARNabby

Other than the admin's/mod's, of course.

Twisteruk

Its Set In Stone =)

-