Two simple conclusions

ego · Nov 26, 08:12 AM 2011

Two simple conclusions.

I notice that some selections produce higher strike ratio then others with out being particular advance.
I also notice there is no need to win every placed bet to gain a total gain.

I experiment using the line 1 1 1 2 and playing against the previous outcome twice.
That way you have to get series of three or higher to lose twice.
And as singels and series of two is so common does it create a very high strike ratio.
Not complex at all.

300 trails 2011 10 25 LW-Registry:

WWWLWW LL WLWLWWWWLWLW LL WWWWLWWLWWWW LL WLWWWW LL WLWLW

300 trails 2011 10 26 LW-Registry:

WLWLWWLWWW LL WWWWWW LL WWLWWLWWWWWW LL W LL W LL WLWWW LL W

Nickmsi · Nov 26, 08:31 AM 2011

I assume this is for Even Chances?

Can you give some examples to clarify?

Thanks

Nick

ego · Nov 26, 08:49 AM 2011

QuoteI assume this is for Even Chances?

Can you give some examples to clarify?

Thanks

Nick

random org 2011 10 25/26

2
1 W W 1 +1
1 L
1 L
2
1 W W 1 +2
1 L
1 L
2
1 W W 1 +3
1 L
1 L
2
2 L L 1
1 W W 1 +3
1 L
2 W
1 W
2 W
1 W
1 L
1 L
2
1 W W 1 +4
1 L
2 W
1 W
2 W
1 W
1 L
1 L
2
2 L L 1
2 L L 1
1
2 W W 1 +3
1 W
2 W
1 W
2 W
1 W
1 L
2 W
2 L
2 L
1
1 L L 1
2 W W 1 +3
1 W
1 L
1 L
1
2
2 L L 1
1 W W 1 +3
2 W
2 L
1 W
1 L
2 W
1 W
1 L
1 L
2
1 W W 1 +4
1 L
1 L
2
1 W W 1 +5
2 W
2 L
2 L
2
1
2 W W 1 +6
2 L
1 W
1 L
2 W
1 W
2 W
2 L
2 L
2
2
1
1 L L 1
2 W W 1 +6
1 W
1 L
1 L
1
2
2 L L 1
1 W W 1 +6
1 L
2 W
2 L
1 W
2 W
2 L
1 W
1 L
2 W
1 W
1 L
1 L
1
1
2
2 L L 1
2 L L 1
2
2
2
2
1
2 W W 1 +5
2 L
1 W
1 L
2 W
2 L
1 W
2 W
2 L
2 L
1
2 W W 1 +6
2 L
2 L
1
2 W W 1 +7
1 W
2 W
1 W
1 L
2 W
1 W
2 W
1 W
2 W
2 L
2 L
2
2
1
2 W W 1 +8
1 W
2 W
2 L
2 L
1
1 L L 1
2 W W 1 +8
2 L
2 L
2
1
2 W W 1 +9
2 L
2 L
1
1 L L 1
2 W W 1 +9
2 L
2 L
2
1
2 W W 1 +10
1 W
1 L
1 L
2
1 W W 1 +11
1 L
1 L
1
2
1 W W 1 +12
2 W
2 L
1 W
2 W
2 L
2 L
2
1
1 L L 1
1 L L 1
1
1
2
1 W W 1 +11
2 W
1 W
2 W
1 W
2 W
2 L
1 W
2 W
1 W
2 W
2 L
1 W
2 W
1 W
1 L
2 W
2 L
2 L
1
1 L L 1
2 W W 1 +11
1 W
2 W
1 W
1 L
2 W
2 L
1 W
2 W
1 W
2 W
2 L
1 W
2 W
1 W
1 L
2 W
2 L
2 L
1
2 W W 1 +12
1 W
1 L
1 L
1
1
1
1
1
2
1 W W 1 +13
1 L
2 W
1 W
1 L
1 L
2
1 W W 1 +14
2 W
2 L
1 W
2 W
2 L
2 L
2
1
1 L L 1
1 L L 1
2
1 W W 1 +13
2 W
1 W
2 W
1 W
1 L
1 L
1
1
2
2 L L 1
1 W W 1 +13
2 W
2 L
2 L
1
1 L L 1
2 W W 1 +13
1 W
1 L
2 W
2 L
2 L
2
2
2
2
2
1
1 L L 1
2 W W 1 +13
2 L
1 W
2 W
1 W
1 L
2 W

- - - - - - - - - -

1
2 W W 1 +1
2 L
1 W
1 L
2 W
1 W
2 W
1 W
1 L
1 L
1
2
2 L L 1
1 W W 1 +1
2 W
1 W
2 W
2 L
1 W
2 W
1 W
1 L
1 L
2
2 L L 1
1 W W 1 +1
1 L
2 W
2 L
1 W
1 L
1 L
1
2
1 W W 1 +2
1 L
2 W
2 L
1 W
2 W
1 W
2 W
1 W
2 W
1 W
1 L
1 L
1
2
2 L L 1
1 W W 1 +2
1 L
2 W
2 L
2 L
1
2 W W 1 +3
1 W
2 W
1 W
2 W
1 W
1 L
1 L
1
1
2
1 W W 1 +4
2 L
2 L
2
2
1
1 L L 1
1 L L 1
2
1 W W 1 +3
1 L
1 L
2
1 W W 1 +4
1 L
1 L
1
2
1 W W 1 +5
1 L
1 L
1
2
1 W W 1 +6
2 W
1 W
2 W
1 W
1 L
1 L
1
2
1 W W 1 +7
2 W
2 L
2 L
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
2 W W 1 +8
2 L
2 L
2
2
1
1 L L 1
1 L L 1
1
1
1
1
2
1 W W 1 +7
1 L
2 W
1 W
2 W
2 L
1 W
1 L
1 L
1
2
1 W W 1 +8
2 W
1 W
1 L
1 L
1
2
2 L L 1
1 W W 1 +8
1 L
2 W
1 W
2 W
2 L
1 W
2 W
1 W
1 L
1 L
1 L
2
1 W W 1 +9
2 W
1 W
2 W
2 L
2 L
1
1 L L 1
2 W W 1 +9
1 W
1 L
2 W
1 W
2 W
1 W
1 L
1 L
2
1 W W 1 +10
2 W
1 W
1 L
1 L
2
1 W W 1 +11
2 W
1 W
2 W
2 L
2 L
2
2
2
2
2
1
2 W W 1 +12
2 L
1 W
1 L
2 W
1 W
2 W
2 L
1 W
2 W
2 L
1 W
2 W
1 W
1 L
2 W
1 W
2 W
1 W
2 W
2 L
2 L
2
1
2 W W 1 +13
1 W
2 W
1 W
2 W
2 L
1 W
1 L
2 W
2 L
2 L
1
2 W W 1 +14
2 L
2 L
2
2
1
1 L L 1
1 L L 1
2
1 W W 1 +13
1 L
1 L
1
2
2 L L 1
2 L L 1
1
2 W W 1 +12
2 L
1 W
1 L
2 W
1 W
2 W
2 L
2 L
1
1 L L 1
1 L L 1
2
1 W W 1 +11
2 W
2 L
2 L
2
1
1 L L 1
2 W W 1 +11
2 L
2 L
1
2 W W 1 +12
2 L
2 L
2
1
2 W W 1 +13
2 L
1 W
2 W
1 W
2 W
2 L
2 L
2
2
1
1 L L 1
1 L L 1
1
1
2
1 W W 1 +12
1 L
2 W
2 L
2 L
1
1 L
1 L
2
2

Master_of_pockets · Nov 26, 09:00 AM 2011

Unfortunately no selection can produce higher strike ratio then others.
This would be the way to win constantly but the game can t allow this to happen.

ego · Nov 26, 09:08 AM 2011

Quote from: Master_of_pockets on Nov 26, 09:00 AM 2011
Unfortunately no selection can produce higher strike ratio then others.
This would be the way to win constantly but the game can t allow this to happen.

Yes i agree it should be that way - but still i reach 3 STD flat betting using EC witch is not possible.
So you are unfortunately correct.
And yes you are correct the game can't allow that to happen to win constantly - that is no news - but thanks for sharing what we already know.

Feel free to show me the same LW-Registry with DBL or FTL ...
1024 trails show average fluctation and would revial any significant difference - if it would exist any using the law of series or not.

Master_of_pockets · Nov 26, 09:43 AM 2011

There is no need for you to have this attitude.
And I know from your posts that you are a great understander of roulette.So when you post something I know that you know what you say.

But I am just saying that a flat bet selection can win 1200 bets.It has happened to me.
If you have played more than 1200 bets and you are still up then this thing deserves more testing.

ego · Nov 26, 09:50 AM 2011

Quote from: ego on Nov 26, 09:08 AM 2011
Yes i agree it should be that way - but still i reach 3 STD flat betting using EC witch is not possible.
So you are unfortunately correct.
And yes you are correct the game can't allow that to happen to win constantly - that is no news - but thanks for sharing what we already know.

Feel free to show me the same LW-Registry with DBL or FTL ...
1024 trails show average fluctuation and would reveal any significant difference - if it would exist any using the law of series or not.

1024 trails comparison if there exist a higher strike ratio and probability that singels and series of two using the law of series hit more frequent then any other selection like FTL or DBL.

The law of series or Ecart play ...

300 trails 2011 10 25 LW-Registry:

WWWLWW LL WLWLWWWWLWLW LL WWWWLWWLWWWW LL WLWWWW LL WLWLW

FTL

300 trails 2011 10 25 LW-Registry:

LWLWLWWW LL LW LL WW LL WWLWWLWWLWLW LL LWW LL WLWWWWLWWLWWLWWWLWLW LL LL LL WWLWWW LL LW LL LWW LL LL LL WW LL WW LL LL W LL LWLW LL LWWLWWLWWLWWWW

It is not the same amount of placed bets - but it will soon show if the there is or is not any difference.

Master_of_pockets · Nov 26, 09:53 AM 2011

I am sorry I am not familiar with the terms FTL or DBL

ego · Nov 26, 09:53 AM 2011

Quote from: Master_of_pockets on Nov 26, 09:43 AM 2011
There is no need for you to have this attitude.
And I know from your posts that you are a great understander of roulette.So when you post something I know that you know what you say.

But I am just saying that a flat bet selection can win 1200 bets.It has happened to me.
If you have played more than 1200 bets and you are still up then this thing deserves more testing.

Well i apologies for being not so polite - it is just that i know it is 50/50 and nothing is due to happen.

ego · Nov 26, 09:55 AM 2011

Quote from: Master_of_pockets on Nov 26, 09:53 AM 2011
I am sorry I am not familiar with the terms FTL or DBL

FTL = Follow the last
DBL = Decision before last

Post next comparison later ...

Master_of_pockets · Nov 26, 10:02 AM 2011

so if I understood correct the 1 trigger is when we have RRR B (3 or more of the same and 1 change) then you bet the R 1 time and if it will lose then you are betting 1 more time the same?

ego · Nov 27, 02:02 AM 2011

Quote from: Master_of_pockets on Nov 26, 10:02 AM 2011
so if I understood correct the 1 trigger is when we have RRR B (3 or more of the same and 1 change) then you bet the R 1 time and if it will lose then you are betting 1 more time the same?

That is correct and i find some fluctation with 2011 10 27 LW-Registry:

WWLWW LL LL LWLWW LL LL WWWWWWWLWWLWWWWWW LL LL WWWW LL WWWWWW LL WW

News:

Two simple conclusions