• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Almost every system has been tested many times before. Start by learning what we already know doesn't work, and why.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

Question: what is the game of roulette

Started by reddwarf, Dec 28, 09:16 AM 2011

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

maestro

so at the end of the day roulette remains game of chance.... >:D hope it turns good way of play nick...
Law of the sixth...<when you play roulette there will always be a moron tells you that you will lose to the house edge>

donik7777

Hi Nick!
How many units do you lose if you lose, and how many units you win?
I saw you play against the last street? You put high or low and 5 street?
Thanks.

superman

Hi Nick

I see where you are coming from but hate to say, I have tested random against random, the win/loss ratio is just the same as flipping a coin, I have tested it against PHP random(), random.org C++ ranodm() and Playtech they all have the same ups and downs, these are of course just my findings and I know other programmers have done the same, even trying two open game windows and using one against the other. Your results may vary.

Streets: Theres a member on the old VLS forum called John Gold, he had/has a blog section where he told us about Streets of Gold, very very similar to what you are doing, I have coded his system into a bot and it fails, you will be suprised ho woften that street hits, when you don't want it to, it's a good read you should check it out, sorry I'm to lazy to link to it lol
There's only one way forward, follow random, don't fight with it!

Ignore a thread/topic that mentions 'stop loss', 'virtual loss' and also when a list is provided of a progression, mechanical does NOT work!

reddwarf

Hi superman,


If i'm not mistaken nicks approach is a little different. It is based on a nice piece of maths, you can find it in this tread, i put the link on it.


It can be proven, for unbounded numbers, that you can increase the probability of guessing if the next number is smaller or greater than the previous number by using a gaussian random number generator. The rng's you mention Generate uniform distributed numbers, so this in itself is already different.


I think that nick understands that for bounded numbers this might not be true, but his experiment is at least an indication that he might be on to something.


Reddwarf


reddwarf

Nicksmi,


Maybe it is an idea to open a new thread where we can discuss and follow your experiment?


Grts reddwarf

Nickmsi

 Hi Donik . . .




In my testing, I checked only the RNG data spins to see if they would win for just two types of bets, ie. Betting HIGH and Betting 11 Streets.  There may be other bets that might even be better.


I did not bet them together, just kept the results.


For example, in 2000 spins we would have had 537 bets on the Streets.  We would have won 494 times and lost 43 times.  Each loss would have been 11 units or 473.  Our flat bet profit was 21 (494-473).


In the same 2000 spins we would have had 744 bets on HIGH. We would have won 386 and lost 358 for a flat bet profit of 28.


What intrigued me was how close to the expected win/loss values these bets were and how stable the ecart (variance) was, albeit only 2000 spins tested.  Might changed drastically with more testing.


My thinking was that with this kind of stability perhaps we could get off the train at the profit stations more often.  Whether you want to call it “hit and run”, timing, luck or “knowing when to stop” or whatever, I think riding the ecart is one of the best ways to make a few bucks.


If this does not pan out, perhaps John Gold (thanks Superman) might have a few nuggets to mine.

You are right reddwarf, that this testing is not the same as the experiment, but it was just a thought I had that might be applicable to roulette.    Maybe it is just random vs random but I do enjoy the journey.



Don't give up . . . . .Don't ever give up.

Nickmsi

 
Spins
Wins
Losses
P/L
Profit %
2750
386
358
28
3.76%
3000
423
385
38
4.70%
3250
459
412
47
5.40%
3500
488
447
41
4.39%
3750
522
486
36
3.57%
4000
553
521
32
2.98%
4250
587
551
36
3.16%
4500
622
580
42
3.49%
4750
652
615
37
2.92%
5000
684
643
41
3.09%
Still testing.  I am now just concentrating on the HIGH bet and have discarded the street betting.

The above is the results from just the HIGH bet.  It still shows remarkable stability.  It almost passes the Van Keelen Test, ie. if in 1000 placed bets you generate 100 plus profit. We only generated 40 Plus profit in over 1300 bets.

Again, this is all flat betting with RNG spins.

With time permitting, will now look at some reasonable progression that might enhance the profits.

Nick
Don't give up . . . . .Don't ever give up.

reddwarf

Hmmm,

no more games to be played within roulette? I think I will lock this topic.

grts reddwarf

-