I tested Vile s BET and it lost big time.I am posted it and he deleted it 5 time

[Master_of_pockets]

I tested Vile s bet and It lost big time.
I posted the graph and I also gave him the spins file for him to test and to see that I made no mistakes.
I posted NOTHING offensive!!!! I was speaking very polite !

I also said that the other members can test it as well in the spins file I gave....

He keeps deleting my post every time I am posting it(I did it copy/paste)

Why does he has such a childish behaviour?
Is it so bad for his bet to be losing?
Is he selling anything...NO...so why is he deleting my proof post?

Make your own conclusions.

The spin file is here.....test the bet after spin no. 400 and u will realise that it can t recover and that it leaves us with a big loss....
He said not to bet more than 300 spins....ok then start from no. spin 400 and bet till spin 700...and u will see....
This will also explain to some of you why HIT and RUN or playing small sessions can t make any deference if a system/bet is losing.
thanks.

[Master_of_pockets]

Here is the graph....Vile deleted this one too! Incredible !

[Master_of_pockets]

Now he claims that I fabricated the numbers of the file !
So let me get this straight .... I stayed 2 days and I was typing 18.000+ numbers in a doc for sabotazing him !!! LoL
I have this wesbian spins file in my PC at least 2 years long.

Oh my God ! what else will I hear from this guy?

He is guarding his thread and he keeps deleting my NON offensive post...unreal!

[Master_of_pockets]

And it s getting even more funny,
Before posting the losing graph and post the spin file I had posted 2 posts with graph saying that the system is good and that it s winning so far and that I will test more....And he kept the posts!

But when I tested more and lost big time and couldn t recoup after 200+ spins , he deleted my posts.

[vile]

My thread is call sessions over 300 spins...its explained iin my post that
I test it thatway no in zillion spins...that's about how many spins will I play tonight....
And MOP sends me 18174 spins and victoriously said agan...it doesn't work.......BRAVO
test it on wiesbaden sessions over 300 spins not 18174 spins MOP and before you do
anything further,read carefully my instructions how to bet in my excel.You realy are ignorant and
incorrigible......In future I will delete every of your post in my thread.I would like to tell you few more
things but am hurry in casino.

[Master_of_pockets]

I ALREADY SAID TO TEST AFTER SPIN 400 TILL SPIN 700!!!
DO You know MATHS??? THOSE ARE 300 SPINS and not ZILLION ...U SAY THAT THE BET CAN WIN ANY 300 SPINS....OK THEN TEST THOSE 300..........

I NEVER POSTED THAT THE BET CAN T WIN IN 18.000 SPINS.....I SAID IT CAN NOT RECOUP IN 300 SPINS!!! AND U SAY THAT IT CAN WIN ANY 300.....

I HAVE ATTACHED THE SPIN FILE HERE....U AND ANYONE CAN TEST AND SEE IF I HAVE ANY MISTAKES OR NOT.....

i am speaking with proofs and not empty talks.....

With your behaviour I wonder in what environment u grew up...unreal!
I am glad that people in here saw your real face

[vile]

Individual perm. sessions over 300 spins.....CAPITO NOW.

[Master_of_pockets]

LOL....it makes no deference......

[atlantis]

Quick test in RX after importing those spins and playing starting at spin 401 onwards:
I stopped after 36 spins at -225 units betting with vile's suggested cyclic progression.
Highest bet 10-10-10
Never went into positive figures.
A.

[buffalowizard]

Maybe I don't agree with mop's cantankerous nature, he is right that 300 spins be they at the beginning middle or end of any large sample is still 300 spins regardless!
There comes a time when we all need to accept our systems can and will bust big time. This like all others is not invincible.

[Master_of_pockets]

"""he is right that 300 spins be they at the beginning middle or end of any large sample is still 300 spins regardless! """

Exactly . Even a little child can understand that.This is what I was telling all those years...that if someone haven t understood HOW roulette and the maths of roulette are, then they don t have the correct judjement to make a system that MAYBE it will be a working one.

"""
There comes a time when we all need to accept our systems can and will bust big time. This like all others is not invincible."""

Yes. This is what I am saying....But Vile thinks that anyone that tells that his (and it s not even HIS) bet is losing, he is acting like a child and he doesn't want the truth to be in public...UNREAL!

"""I stopped after 36 spins at -225 units betting with vile's suggested cyclic progression."""

Yes exactly like all progression systems betting on random events...u may win  50 sessions of +10 chips...but when u will lose only 1 or more times, u will give all the winnings away + the BR.(like Martingale)

I think Vile should be warned by a MOD for his behaviour ! I already changed mine and i was polite in his thread...I only posted results and proofs and I even said I was happy that recovered in some
stage....but he kept his childish behaviour.

I have promised iggiv that I will be nice with everyone...and I am still keeping my word.

[Drazen]

There comes a time when we all need to accept our systems can and will bust big time. This like all others is not invincible.

Gents, waiting to find something invincible system is wrong. You can spare all your life on that and you won't find it.


Everything can and will lose once, but will it lose big it depends only on you. don't go too far and you won't lose too much. Very simple.


And how far is best to go you can only find with extensivly testing on daily basis. This MOP is an id**ot who found one losing session and now giggles how this lose..


Whoever expects that won't have losing session is in big fallacy but on contrary if it  thinks that because of that can't be in plus longterm is very wrong.


Nobody here thinks at way how to use this losses to create winnings in the end???


How often they happen? Test 100 wiesbaden sessions and see how many times you would end in plus, and how many  you would loose.


So what would be best MM to capitalize winnings and to cover losses when they happen?
Is it possible to use more levels to cover losses?


For that you need to have good bank, you can't conquer the game with 100 units in pocket.
And you need few more things which only rare have here. The ones who have them, also have money from roulette. That is a fact!


Your thinking is: OMG if it losses than it is bad, i can't play it continuosly without loss and with low bank. FU*CK.


THAT IS NOT THE WAY GENTS


Cheers


Drazen

[buffalowizard]

It depends on how many losing sessions can be found and not just go by viles own winning selections. the truth is out there somewhere!

[Master_of_pockets]

Exactly buffalowizard

OK. You all saw Vile s reaction to something very normal that I did. I was polute and was just helping in testing. This is called contribution.

This thread will be locked as the subject is finished.