EC, No Trolling

[albertojonas]

first i have to focus again that each strategy of filtering depends on the registry each Bet Selection provides.

For the bet selection i explored above the strategy was to attack after a L once.
ex:
L
L=L
L
L=L
W
L
W=W
.

What you can had to this is to do the same with a different bet unit
after LL
same example:

L
L
L=L
L
W (optional attack =W)
L
W

then after LLL again with different bet size
same example again:

L
L
L
L=L
W
L
W
.....
ETC... and so on.


The above was to choose triggers to attack the original LW registry using different filters: L - LL - LLL - LLLL - LLLLL etc

2. What one can experiment with is to re filter. with the same or other filters.
imagine you filter 1st after a L and after that you can apply the same or another filter to this results, like a 2nd layer or dimension.

*******************************************************
the most important is that you are acquainted with the behaviour of the LW registry each bet selection provides. fluctuation, drawdowns, max loss, etc...
Bet selections are not all the same, odds maybe, behavior NOT. And this is not GF.
*********************************************************
-What i mentioned to GLC was precisely that there are more ways to filter = more filters.
and one of them is to attack once after a win that comes after a string of losses = L L W BET
this way you try and avoid long strings of Losses. it is good for bet selections that tend to cluster wins and losses.

Hope this helps.

[albertojonas]

Looks like we only bet after the 1st L.  then we have to wait for at least 1 W then we can bet after the next L.  Is this right?


GLC

That is interesting filter for bet selections that provide Lots of LW

LWLWLWLWLWLWLW

[GLC]

I don't know if this has anything to add to this topic, but it is another perspective on filtering.


link:://targetbetting.blogspot.com/

[GLC]

Also:


link:://:.sethbets.com/

[albertojonas]

funny you mentioned that. it is interesting material and very helpfull in building a progression / money management system.

I could not find the conection with the LW registry, may you point it out?

[monaco]

thanks albertojonas for detailed reply.




I remember GLC mentioning the use of the LW registry with regard to the Sethbets method - why make lots of samesize losing bets, waiting for a W before trying to recoup - just wait for a virtual W then bet.. made sense to me anyway!


thanks again

[Tomla021]

Seth is heavily involved in chasing Horsie bets with his system now. I also dont understand why he bets the small amount? In reality its a chase of a Win after a Win WL bet once more for a Win then repeat on the next win after a Loss

[GLC]

funny you mentioned that. it is interesting material and very helpfull in building a progression / money management system.

I could not find the conection with the LW registry, may you point it out?

I guess it was really a W filter.  Just bet a martingale after a W shooting for a WW to fully recover.  I posted a bet selection method where we went for multiple wins after a W to fully recover.  It helped our progression stay a little lower, but it still reached the stratosphere every now and then.

I mostly found myself agreeing with a lot of his ideas.  Some of the new members and guests may have never read his material and I think it's worth being aware of at least.

[GLC]

Something like using a W for a filter/trigger means that we never bet more than once on a losing run.  We can have WLs strung together that would give us a long series of L's, but that's less common, I think.  Anything like this: LWLLLWLLWLWLWLLLLLWLWLWLWLLLWLLWLLL would hurt. 

That's 11 losses in a row if you just wait and bet to make a full recovery after each W.  I don't think betting 1 on each Loss helps any, although it does give us more won units but at the same time it causes our bet size to grow faster.
It also keeps our place at a table where you have to bet each spin.

Risky if you don't have a bet selection that gives more than average number of W's in a row.

The above sequence would be 1-2-4-8-16-32-64-128-256-512-1024 and you'd have to bet 2048 on the winning or 12th double up.  Too rich for my blood.