Hybrid DC4 + PCWB

[GLC]

George

I admit that i haven't tested it enough to come up with with some wiseass remarks. But generally in my opinion not enough BR is the most important sin among roulette players.  I know that 90% here will disagree with me. 

Regards

You're probably right reguarding the bankroll.  The one who wouldn't disagree with you is F_LAT_INO and he's gto the most experience with roulette having been a dealer for a quarter of a century and a player forever.  It takes a lot to counterbalance his opinion in my mind.  That makes you, me, Winkel, MrJ, Nathan Detroit and F_LAT_INO on the big bankroll side, any others?

[F_LAT_INO]

George mate,
Without a decent BR that can support the method you are playing,
no chance come on top.Here you mostly are throughout a session
and is up to individual when to stop.Last night was 420 chips down
at the first part of the session and didn't panic at all as expected streak
arrived which put me on top more then 200 and my session was finish.

[Robeenhuut]

We did not wait too long for an input of another BR believer  Nice riding Flat and cheers to your winnings. I wish i could score free booze at a casino. By the way do you drink while playing?

[F_LAT_INO]

Don't drink at all since passed 70,earlier yes but not while play.

[Robeenhuut]

Don't drink at all since passed 70,earlier yes but not while play.

Yeah dont drink and gamble  But somehow it helps me in my bet selection.  So last question  PCWB or Rolling Lines?  I know PCWB requires  larger BR and its your older baby....

[F_LAT_INO]

this latest 4/5 sectors havent lost as yet aiming 100 chips,56 wiesbaden sessions over 300 spins,
won all,while 9 of 56 would have lost if continued playing.

[Robeenhuut]

this latest 4/5 sectors haven't lost as yet aiming 100 chips,56 wiesbaden sessions over 300 spins,
won all,while 9 of 56 would have lost if continued playing.

So if you played for more than 100 chips you would have lost your BR of 1000 chips playing PCWB?
So i guess you prefer PCWB?  But played strictly for 100u?

[F_LAT_INO]

So if you played for more than 100 chips you would have lost your BR of 1000 chips playing PCWB?
So i guess you prefer PCWB?  But played strictly for 100u?

no,no the BR, but the whole session wouldn't come as a winner...it is not martingale to lose BR,
even thought 47 winning session in whole wins much,much more then those 9 losing sessions.
Tome 100 chips quite enough.