PLAY DOZENS AND WIN 98.27% of THE TIME!

[ScoobyDoo]

Hi Guys,
This method is actually the REVERSE-ZONE.  I have emailed it to Fender1000 but he has not replied me yet. 

I like playing the dozens but if you play 2 dozens at the same time, your win rate will only be around 64% of the time.

My method wins 98. 27% of the time not including losses from Zero however, I have a way to minimize that.  Ok, lets begin:

What you will be looking for is a trigger.  The trigger is a group of the last four decisions that include ONLY TWO of the three dozens. 

Example: 1,2,1,1 - 2,2,3,2 - 3,3,3,1

There 15 in each group of either the 1&2's, 1&3"s or 2&3's

There is a total of 81 groups of four various dozens.

The idea is to wait for a trigger (the previous four spins with only two dozens) and then bet the next four spins on the two dozens in the previous four spins.

If you are betting on Dozens 1&2, the only sequence that can beat you is: 3,3,3,3

If you are betting on Dozens 1&3, the only sequence that can beat you is: 2,2,2,2

If you are betting on Dozens 2&3, the only sequence that can beat you is: 1,1,1,1

So that means there are 80 ways to win and only one way to lose!! 98. 27%

Now, if a Zero comes up during tracking, start over.  If a Zero comes up while betting, stop and start tracking again.  Take the loss.

This method is NOT meant for continuous play.  Play to win 5 units and then play again later. 

As far as a betting method goes, the only one I can think of is 1,1-3,3-9,9-27,27

If you have other ideas, please feel free to post them with explanations.

Have Fun. . .

ScoobyDoo

[VLS]

As far as a betting method goes, the only one I can think of is 1,1-3,3-9,9-27,27

Have you tried a conscious POSITIVE progression instead?

It it my experience those who want to overcome the maximum dispersions with the most money, tend to have a shaky experience over time (the 1-hit-recoups-all crew).

It is better to surf the waves and increase the bets when the hits are clumping...

[iggiv]

I don't think it will work, mate

[buffalowizard]

I don't think it will work, mate :(

I picked up a random card from a past casino visit and had 2 losses within 100 spins.  Would have hurt!

[VLS]

Oh guys, we need the automated testers, the generated charts, the custom-variants with different progressions etc...

I wish I could be coding RouletteSoftware.cc faster, I wish I had more time in the day, but oh well. I gotta wait to use my own tools too... 

[iggiv]

Let's say it straight. Betting on a table layout means a huge bankroll.

Vic what would u say from your experience? U have played a lot with dozens haven't u?

[VLS]

Yes, the layout outside bets has been historically a big bankroll demander, as the more numbers coverage, the larger the bank required to face mid/large dispersions due to the smaller return (1 to 1 or 1 to 2).

The inside selections on the other hand can target only a few numbers, which obviously derives in better return per hit and hence less bank required on the lenghty dispersions per reasonable session-length.



Of course, it is a matter of personal preference dear Iggiv. I know some people who aren't comfortable betting anything less than 50% of the board (i.e. roughly an even chance) and other going as high as 24 numbers bettors.

Still, ultimately what matters is making consistent wins, whatever the numbers are.

Reminds me about someone who said you only need to leave 2 numbers out to derive a profit, and if advantage players (i.e. VB, bias) are so good spotting the best landing zone with plenty of effort, how come they won't be able to leave only 2 numbers out and bet 35 comfortably at the automated machines.

Well, there you are, as usual it is a matter of taste!

[iggiv]

matter of common sense and some knowledge as well. Just think logically. If there were more chances to win on dozens, rows, streets etc, would they let u? No way. They let u do it cause they know it is conveniently looking but in reality it has more chances to lose than betting single numbers. It is just an illusion that u spend less on dozens.

think it this way. we spend 1 unit on dozen, we lose 1 unit. or win 2.
now we spend 12 units betting numbers accordin to some rules. let's say hot sector.
hot sector has more chances to win than any dozen, cause dozen doesn't have any connection to wheel.

so if we make 12 units small in proportion, then we have much more chances to win with the same money. Thus much less chances to win on table dozen.

[iggiv]

for example, this system. U wanna bet like that? wait for 4 last, bla-bla-bla...

fine. Make "wheel dozens", 3 sectors of 12. bet on them according to your system. Harder? sure, it is. but return will be much better.

[ScoobyDoo]

Well Guys,
Let me explain a little more. . .

With groups that have only two dozens showing in a group of the last 4 spins, (1&2 - 1&3 - 2&3) each group has 15 possibilities.  The total number of outcomes of 4 spin dozens is 81. 

For dozens 1&2, the only thing out of 81 possible combinations that can beat you is 3,3,3,3.

For dozens 1&3, the only thing out of 81 possible combinations that can beat you is 2,2,2,2

For dozens 2&3, the only thing out of 81 possible combinations that can beat you is 1,1,1,1

If you had 4 losses in 100 spins, then one of these three things had to have happened.  The approximate odds against that happening is 98. 27%. . . . . How much more for 4 times within 100 spins?

I suggest going back and looking to see if those events actually happened.  I'm not saying it's impossible for it to happen. . . bur 4 times in 100 spins? Questionable. 

[ScoobyDoo]

Also keep in mind that the idea here is to jump in. . . win 2 to 5 units and then quit.  Play only two sessions a day.  Playing this way, you should have many, many wins before ever experiencing a loss.  The amount won should be a lot more than whatever you lose.

But going 100 spins in a row without a break is definately NOT the way to play.  The most number of spins per session should only be 20. . . . . . and usually it will be a lot less than that.

[iggiv]

test it on RX first, then test it on playtech live and betvoyager with pennies. For long time. don't rise your stakes quickly.

[iggiv]

i tried it a few times, it worked on a 1st time. who knows. maybe it will work. but u won't make much money with this method, will u? bankroll 80, winning goal max 5 units.
1/16 of your bankroll.

If this method holds steady then yes, u can make it in a long run. But if you lose only one time, u will need 16 or more sessions to win to get back your money.

[VLS]

Like turbo said: some methods are "Long term investment".

Thing is if you average better than a 16 to 1 win to lose ratio, then that's it

Remember Lionel aimed to 2.5% of session bank! (And he made the original bank several times per year).

[iggiv]

Like turbo said: some methods are "Long term investment".

Thing is if you average better than a 16 to 1 win to lose ratio, then that's it

Remember Lionel aimed to 2.5% of session bank! (And he made the original bank several times per year).

Did he really  stop each time when he won 2.5% of his bankroll?