• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Every system can win in the short-term. It just depends on the spins you play.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

Challange - Brett Morton

Started by ego, Sep 03, 01:22 AM 2012

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Print
Go Down Pages 1 2 3
User actions

ego

#30
Sep 09, 03:28 AM 2012

-

Testing continues ...

Cheers
Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

ego

#31
Sep 10, 02:09 AM 2012

-

I change approach clustering patterns into two.
Using same selection as Brett Morton with previous six.
Only tweak i add is that i don't attack until a fictive win.

Staking plan "Parlay" ...

MM

-9 Loss-Limit
+0 Bottom-Line-Target (Break Even Point)
+3 Happy-Point
+5 Gold-Top
+? Jackpot

I ONLY AIM FOR HAPPY-POINT TO TEST THE VARIANCE OR BREAK EVEN.

RESULTS DAY 1

300 Trails 2012 09 10 Random org
6 Session won out of 6 Session's

+3 Happy-Point
+3 Happy-Point
+3 Happy-Point
+3 Happy-Point
+0 Bottom-Line-Target (Break Even Point)
+3 Happy-Point

RESULT DAY 2

300 Trails 2012 09 09 Random org
5 Session won out of 5 Session's

+3 Happy-Point
+3 Happy-Point
+3 Happy-Point
+3 Happy-Point
+3 Happy-Point
Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

ego

#32
Sep 10, 02:30 AM 2012

RESULT DAY 3

300 Trails 2012 09 08 Random org
4 Session won out of 4 Session's

+3 Happy-Point
+3 Happy-Point
+0 Bottom-Line-Target (Break Even Point)
+3 Happy-Point

Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

ego

#33
Sep 10, 03:02 AM 2012

RESULT DAY 4

300 Trails 2012 09 07 Random org
6 Session won out of 6 Session's

+3 Happy-Point
+0 Bottom-Line-Target (Break Even Point)
+3 Happy-Point
+3 Happy-Point
+3 Happy-Point
+3 Happy-Point
Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

ego

#34
Sep 10, 03:09 AM 2012

18 Session won
3 Session break even

TOTALS

+54 Won 0 Loss
Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

Stepkevh

#35
Sep 10, 03:19 AM 2012
and against what are you exactly playing, because one of your links in your first post isnt working.

Stephan
Just call me Stef ... its shorter then Stepkevh :-)

ego

#36
Sep 10, 03:29 AM 2012

RESULTS DAY 5

300 Trails 2012 09 06 Random org
5 Session won out of 5 Session's

+3 Happy-Point
+3 Happy-Point
+3 Happy-Point
+3 Happy-Point
+3 Happy-Point

-

23 Session won
3 Session break even

TOTALS

+69 Won 0 Loss

-

Quoteand against what are you exactly playing, because one of your links in your first post isnt working.

Stephan

What link ? what is not working ?
Can you be more specific ...
Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

Stepkevh

#37
Sep 10, 03:56 AM 2012
This link from your first post on the first page gives an error, i suppose it goes about the bet selection ?

link:://rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=10151.0

Stephan
Just call me Stef ... its shorter then Stepkevh :-)

ego

#38
Sep 10, 05:06 AM 2012

I test both links and they work - strange ...

Cheers
Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

iggiv

#39
Sep 10, 06:30 AM 2012
Hey ego!

don't stop, smart man!
i think i am not the only one watching


thanx!

Stepkevh

#40
Sep 10, 06:34 AM 2012
An Error Has Occurred!
The topic or board you are looking for appears to be either missing or off limits to you.

thats what i get if i click the link  :question:
Just call me Stef ... its shorter then Stepkevh :-)

dino246

#41
Sep 10, 07:03 AM 2012
Ego.

Please keep on testing,am following your thread with great interest !!!!

All the best.

Dino.

amk

#42
Sep 10, 08:28 PM 2012
Ego, (hello me :)  ) you said,


" i have no clue yet what kind of staking plan some one should use to get a optimal game plan."


I do not understand the method fully yet and just wanted to check an idea which could help.


Is there anyway to get two decent EC bets for this method?
With this I mean, after a trigger of one EC two will follow of the same, a "triple"


Can the clustering accommodate this somehow?

ego

#43
Sep 11, 01:06 AM 2012
Quote from: amk on Sep 10, 08:28 PM 2012
Ego, (hello me :)  ) you said,


" i have no clue yet what kind of staking plan some one should use to get a optimal game plan."


I do not understand the method fully yet and just wanted to check an idea which could help.


Is there anyway to get two decent EC bets for this method?
With this I mean, after a trigger of one EC two will follow of the same, a "triple"


Can the clustering accommodate this somehow?

The results above is using parlay - but with a twist.
I do only increase the bet once on a win then i go back lower the bet again.

As the MM with strict rules does not allow sloppy of fuzzy game plan.
If i would hunting long strings of winnings i would not succeed getting does results above.
Instead i been aiming for short chops of winnings - at least twice and capitalize upon does.

I find the bet selection being valid - but the issue is to find a good working march.
Will post some more results as sooner or later we will get strings of loses.
Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

ego

#44
Sep 11, 01:27 AM 2012

Results Day 6

300 Trails 2012 09 05 Random org
1 Session won out of 3 Session's

-9 Loss-Limit
-9 Loss-Limit
+3 Happy-Point
Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.
-
Print
Go Up Pages 1 2 3
User actions