One Dozen Plz ?

[ewarwoowar]

yes, i read it like that, but i thought dino was taking the loss on the first line before betting all the dozens on the next line, if the losing line qualified as a bet.

i think we're getting close here, just need to work on a more gentle progression.

[dino246]

I think both have merit.

All the stats to date are as ewarwoowar states in his latest Post.

Will investigate carrying on the same line and compare stats.

Still trying to figure out a different progression.

[dino246]

Ok,a radicle way of retrieving EVERY loss that QUALIFIES from ROW 1 start betting to recover that loss from ROW 2,when recovered or new high STOP betting ROW 2.

In the meantime continue to play ROW 1 for WINNERS ONLY and when there's a loss recover it playing ROW 2,which  the stats show us has a VERY high Strike-Rate.

NO losers recovered from ROW 1.

Will hopefully show an example in game-play when MY brain has RECOVERED !!!!

[KoolKat]

Nice work Dino 246 Cheers Koolkat

[KoolKat]

just ran through a couple of my sessions, not going to next line of 3 after a loss on the first dozen, but carrying on the same line.
apart from 111 and 222 the results were excellent.
perhaps we need another, less aggressive progression.

ewarwoowar, not sure I understand are you saying the same as me in post number 158? Thanks Koolkat

[dino246]

KoolKat.

Many Thanks.

Will hopefully show example of what i mean tomorrow after mulling it over some more tonight.

It was of course you that started this latest train of thought after a loser in ROW 1.


Regards,

Dino.

[ewarwoowar]

koolkat, it looks like i am saying exactly that! sorry i wasn't stealing your idea, well not intentionally anyway!
although i think the win ratio is way over 80%.
this is a good selection method, we just need a safer progression. perhaps not look for profit after the 2nd doz, just look to keep the game alive.
cheers.

[KoolKat]

koolkat, it looks like i am saying exactly that! sorry i wasn't stealing your idea, well not intentionally anyway!
although i think the win ratio is way over 80%.
this is a good selection method, we just need a safer progression. perhaps not look for profit after the 2nd doz, just look to keep the game alive.
cheers.

No worries, I agree a safer progression is needed. Cheers K

[Twisteruk]

Its great everyone workin together !

We will get there 

[donik7777]

Dino If you will be bet on any 2 dozen results be same in long term. Like code 4 or D&G.   

[dino246]

Hi donik.

As we all know,at some point in a session we have to recover a loss with a progression.

What i'm trying to do is divert that progression from Row1 DOWN THE CHANNEL of Row2(where the Hit-Rate is far superier than Row1).

Mind you the Hit-Rate of Row1 is pretty good anyway.

Also if we all want to be GREEDY we can take 2 PROFITS after each QUALIFYING loser from BOTH Row1 and Row2 as shown in Reply#170 Page 12

At present my INSTINCT says if we recover with a progression within Row1 then Hit-Run-win style may be best.

Or utilising both Row1 and Row2 the perhaps a continuous style would work going forward.


To be continued.........

[Twisteruk]

Ok here is a little fun Method that wins and amazes me with its strike rate
I've only paperbet this on Paddypower Slingshot (60 spins an hour) but I'm up over 60 Units
You can use your preffered progression

Write down the last 15 numbers as Dozens in a 3x Grid like so,

123
xxx
xxx
xxx
xxx

etc etc

You then bet for a single repeat from the line above, here is an example
133
323 Hit 3rd bet
222 Hit 2nd bet
112 Hit 3rd bet

The most lines I've seen hit in a row is 8 and the most for losses is 2 lines, so far the 3rd line has always hit but I accept it can and will lose at some point
I only play for 1 hit per line but you can get 2 hits often and 3 does happen also, but I'm happy with 1 hit.

Enjoy !

Anyone usin the Original System ??

[Maui13]

another one with dublinbet actuals.
312
132 NB
231 NB
132 NB
221 NB
233 W
332 W
233 W
312 W
312 NB
123 NB
222 NB
232 NB
133 L
321 W
333 NB
121 NB
211 W
223 W
312 W
313 NB
111 W
221 NB
213 W
131 NB
232 L
121 L
133 W
311 W
332 W
221 W
311 L
333 W
123 NB
223 NB
303 W
311 NB
122 W
332 L
133 L
321 W
213 NB
121 NB
112 W
111 W
311 NB
112 W
213 W
202 NB
332 NB
311 W
213 L
113 NB
313 W
312 W
131 NB
221 L
331 L
211 L
231 W
123 NB
111 NB
331 NB
221 L
213 W

27pts profit

Ok, I don't mean to hijack this method, but I was just inspired by how everyone is putting in some grey matter....so I tried something with good results.


The above was ewarwoowar's numbers he played... so I tried my method next to his numbers and here are my results...


On the left the original....on the right mine



312   
132 NB   W1
231 NB   W1
132 NB   
221 NB   W1
233 W   W2
332 W   
233 W   W1
312 W   W2
312 NB   
123 NB   W1
222 NB   W1
232 NB   
133 L   W1
321 W   W1
333 NB   
121 NB   W1
211 W   W1
223 W   
312 W   W1
313 NB   W3
111 W   
221 NB   W1
213 W   W1
131 NB   
232 L   W1
121 L   W2
133 W   
311 W   W1
332 W   W1
221 W   
311 L   W1
333 W   W1
123 NB   
223 NB   W1
303 W   W1
311 NB   
122 W   W1
332 L   W2
133 L   
321 W   W1
213 NB   W1
121 NB   
112 W   W2
111 W   W2
311 NB   
112 W   W1
213 W   W1
202 NB   
332 NB   W1
311 W   W1
213 L   
113 NB   W1
313 W   W1
312 W   
131 NB   W1
221 L   W1
331 L   
211 L   W1
231 W   W1
123 NB   
111 NB   W2
331 NB   W1
221 L   
213 W   W2


My results - NO LOSSES! 43 Wins vs. 27 if I counted correctly.  Where I do see possible bad runs - when you have for example 111,222,333 as qualifiers....


See if you can figure out what I did! I'll explain later!


Regards,
M

[subby]

OMG...played paddy power tonight and noticed the 3rd dozen hadn't hit for 18 spins so started a marty...got shafted and lost £40 odd quid on it....the 3rd dozen didn't hit for 44 spins! I tracked it even though I wasn't playing it, holy shit

[rayhd63]

Anyone using the Original System ??

I tried allot but it tanks to much.....

maybe you could have a look at the file from Wiesbaden I played.

Thanks
Ray