*****FIVE*****

[Johnlegend]

"I will talk to any reasonable people by PM. I don't need this."

And then you'll sell it to "reasonable" people.  you're a scammer, John Boy.

Watch my next thread, John.  I got something for you!!

Samster

Sell what? the methods out there Sam. You have people who got it straight off the bat. Think before you make such slanderous statements.

[KoolKat]

This may give me away a bit, please guys enough, I look up to both of you TCS and JL, i respect both your Opinions now please shake hands 

Koolkat

[Still]

This may give me away a bit, please guys enough, I look up to both of you TCS and JL, i respect both your Opinions now please shake hands 

Koolkat

I knew it!  You are Garnabby!

[Still]

I don't need people attacking me for nothing. You try to help some people and this is what you get. I will talk to any reasonable people by PM. I don't need this.

And then you'll sell it to "reasonable" people.  you're a scammer, John Boy.

Reminds me of a passage in the Gospel of Thomas where Jesus takes Thomas aside to tell him three things in private.  Interestingly, Thomas does not say what they were.  Later, from another book published in the last ten years, and also by the same Thomas, i found out what those three things were, and why he was instructed not to say anything.  I won't say what they were, but the reason is because they would have been considered blasphemous, even amongst the rest of the disciples, who, having been brought up amongst stone-throwers, were themselves still a bit trigger happy.  So it was for Thomas' protection.  If true, it would explain the almost inexplicable enmity between Thomas and the rest of the crew, who eventually ostracized him.  Likewise, anyone falling in with the rest of the crew still, to this day, ostracizes Thomas. 

But i digress (or maybe not)...

~Still 

[KoolKat]

I knew it!  You are Garnabby!

Still who is Garnabby  K

[Still]

Still who is Garnabby  K

Garnabby is the nemesis of anyone who has faith in the ability to win (long term) in roulette.  So of course it was a joke.  However, your request is as unlikely as it would be for christians to shake hands with the apostle Thomas. 

[Still]

.

[TwoCatSam]

I owe John an apology.  I spoke like an a--hole.

I took offense when I said I lost and he took comfort and pleasure in that. 

Sorry, John.  Let me retract those words if you will.

Sam

[kevint3]

@kevint3

Thanks for that excellent pictorial.  I might actually start investing in actually understanding the rules now. 

@ Still --- No problem.  I really like the premise of this system. If it works have as good as it has for John I  would be happy. I have watched silently in this thread trying to figure it out.  Now I don't think I could play without it... Lets hope it works for all those who want it to.

[KoolKat]

Hi kevint3, I guess i am struggling like some of us on this forum. in you Pictorial you had 2 = a 1=b as trigger maybe a stupid question can i ask why did you bet against the B for a win was it because this presented a 4 gap?

cheers K

[Robeenhuut]

I was just curious by JL claims of his long winning streaks with FIVE. Some people doubt that this bet selection is better than any 4 double dozen bets. I conducted some experiment involving 6 separate bet selections using RNG in RX software. I ran 160 sessions of 1000 spins and looked at breakdown in each session of results of betting against 1 dozen or column repeating itself 4 times - so 6 separate bet selections involving 4 step progression. So essentially i tested 1M spins involving 600000+ games in total. No session which produced around 600+ games for each dozen and column ended without loss. There were just 3 or 4 that  had a single loss. Overall i did not keep stats of strike rate but i think that it was close to average of one loss in 80 games. 
So it just intrigued me that John is currently at 1000+ games winning streak.  Maybe there is a limit to random if his stats are correct  and FIVE can beat an average strike rate by a significant margin.

[Turner]

Like i keep saying, 5 is astrology not astronomy...and not many people with a telescope read their horoscopes. There will allways be a split camp with this kind of system.
Turner

[Robeenhuut]

Like i keep saying, 5 is astrology not astronomy...and not many people with a telescope read their horoscopes. There will allways be a split camp with this kind of system.
Turner

My split persona tells me one thing from a mathematical point of view but if you see some stats its other thing. Anyway a  few people have a beef because of the current setup of JL challenge. The problem is that Five bets represent just a small fraction of all the bets because you have to bet each spin on BV. So if you see 0.05u gain with 0.01u base bet you really dont know what it represents. Btw i tested again my sessions on RX and again no 600 games session without a loss in about 1000 games. 

[Turner]

by the way i tested again my sessions on RX and again no 600 games session without a loss in about 1000 games. 

matt....Just run that by me again mate.....
Always remember, im slow as fuk!

[Robeenhuut]

matt....Just run that by me again mate.....
Always remember, I'm slow as fuk!

To clarify i meant 1000 sessions of 600+ games.  And my point is that we have essentially the bet with the same chance either betting against 4 doubles like FIVE and against 4 consecutive dozens or columns like in my testing. And according to John stats he hit 1000+ winning streak and in RX testing other bet selections struggle with 600 mark in 2M spins.  It just got me thinking but i can not get my math out of my head...