winning 2 column system (needs high bankroll)

[zwanatico]

Sorry, if this is old system...
We know that max consecutive repeat of column in 3 million spins test is 14 times.
check: link:://vlsroulette.com/index.php?topic=19441.msg144210

So, we just need a bankroll of 728 units to start betting after 8 consecutive repeats, using a 6 step betting progression.
1,3,9,27,81,243
I know waiting could be long, and betting 486 units in last step could be frightening, but, the math is the math...

opinions?

[TwoCatSam]

When you get to the 14th spin, you will realize that it has a 50/50 chance of winning.  And it could go 15!!

[Turner]

When you get to the 14th spin, you will realize that it has a 50/50 chance of winning.  And it could go 15!!

Correct....no matter how many stats you throw at a wheel...the odds are same as ever.

Also.....its not 14, its 15 because the dozen hit 15 in a row in the VLS stats. A dozen is 12 numbers like a column

The stats basically say 3,6,9,12,15,18,21,24,27,30,33,36 never hit more than 14.

What about 1,4,5,6,7,14,15,17,22,23,24,33. that's 12 numbers too. Whos to say that this particular 12 ran for 17 spins in a row? that's not on the stats list.

its not Col C ran for 14 spins.....its groups of 12 run for ~15.

I wouldnt like to lose 700 nicker to find out

Turner

[Johnlegend]

Sorry, if this is old system...
We know that max consecutive repeat of column in 3 million spins test is 14 times.
check: link:://vlsroulette.com/index.php?topic=19441.msg144210

So, we just need a bankroll of 728 units to start betting after 8 consecutive repeats, using a 6 step betting progression.
1,3,9,27,81,243
I know waiting could be long, and betting 486 units in last step could be frightening, but, the math is the math...

opinions?

There is no such thing as MAXIMUM when dealing with realistic ways to play against random. Will the wheel ever show us 50 reds? Probably not. But who can wait for 40 before they start their campaign? NO ONE. There are of course virtual limits that very seldom are crossed. But I once knew a man who ran a method such as you describe. He won thousands I mean thousands. Then over a two week period lost thousands. When he was hit by several 8 plus streaks of repeaters on the same dozen. His idea was to go after 4 repeats.

But what you offer is simply not realistic. Not even on an RNG. You will get next to no play. I could reel off a dozen such ideas that would probably never lose. But find one person with the inclination and patience to follow them and risk the best part of a 4 figure sum on them. Not likely. We strive to strike a balance between playable and invincible. Theres always a compromise somewhere.

[GLC]

I wish every new roulette player would read and fully understand the last three posts.  It's okay to play systems built on this principle as long as you know what you're up against.

The reality that JL points out is one a lot of us don't contend with until it's too late.  It's easy to test on paper and bet large bets, but when we start playing for real money and we hit that inevitable losing streak and we have to keep betting larger and larger bets, we discover that we don't have the metal it takes to plop down 243 units on 2 different columns to win 1 unit.  That's also when TwoCat's reminder comes to the fore and we are faced with the fact that this next spin for 486 units still has a 32.4% chance to lose.  That's the same as the 1-1 bet we made 5 spins ago.

When you finally saw a column hit 8 times in a row, and that can take days, you had a very good chance to win 1 of the next 6 bets but when you finally got to the 243 unit bet, what has happened before doesn't mean dittilly squat.

Now, is it insanity to play this way?  Not if you know what you're up against.  You could actually play this way the rest of your life and never see 15 columns in a row.  Or, you might see one the very first betting opportunity.  Or, after winning a few hundred units.  That's the gamble.  But we can never reach that point where we know that we have enough money and table limit to bet high enough to win because we could be the one to see 16 columns in a row.

First and foremost is, never gamble with money you can't afford to lose.  If you can afford to lose the 728 units, I say try it.  It'll reveal what you're made of and that won't be a total waste of money, win or lose.

Don't take any of this as an attack against your system.  Most of the systems on this forum, including mine, are built on these same fallacies.  If you're going to play roulette, the systems on this forum will help you control how you play the game, not insure that you will win.
This diatribe is for all the newbies who might be reading this topic and haven't thought of some of these concepts before.

Cheers to all,

GLC