It is possible to win!

[Ralph]

Luck is the main reason, luck is not a force, it is something which is a property of random.
The outcome of the wheel, fitting the methods.

In many forums and in some part from people I know (most do not know I gamble) saying you can not win in the "long" run, due to the built in negative expection.

A casino make a lot of money due to unfair odds, which is theire only way to stay in business.

In our life we might success, or have a more common destination. It is a "house edge" in a lot of things we do. If we avoid anything with odds against us, we will not gain much, but still so we can survive, in most cases.

Risks in many other thing, like educate yourself for five years, and your knowledge is obsolete, is  harder than lose a bet.

We are in many situations in negative expectations, which is just what it is, the outcome is that we meet.

[VLS]

Risks in many other thing, like educate yourself for five years, and your knowledge is obsolete, is  harder than lose a bet.

Ralph, I concur.

In the IT field, this is very true.

10 years and you're like a dinosaur!

[TwoCatSam]

Ralph]

Good to read you again.  I'm working on a way to play THE MAGNIFICENT SEVEN so it is very, very strong.

Hope to post on that soon, but I'll test it until I'm very confident. 

Sam

[Turner]

Ralph]

Good to read you again.  I'm working on a way to play THE MAGNIFICENT SEVEN so it is very, very strong.

Hope to post on that soon, but I'll test it until I'm very confident. 

Sam

Sam...i think repeaters are the only "in your face" clue random ever gave us. Mag 7 has a problem for me and its this. It pushes the wrong button in a gambler and that is when to pull out when its going wrong. The bet can get very heavy and drops quick like a lump of concrete. Also it breaks a cardinal rule. Betting the same static numbers over and over. In the grand scheme of repeater bets i think mr j's catch the 8 train fits the purpose far better.
Turner

[Ralph]

Sam...i think repeaters are the only "in your face" clue random ever gave us. Mag 7 has a problem for me and its this. It pushes the wrong button in a gambler and that is when to pull out when its going wrong. The bet can get very heavy and drops quick like a lump of concrete. Also it breaks a cardinal rule. Betting the same static numbers over and over. In the grand scheme of repeater bets i think mr j's catch the 8 train fits the purpose far better.
Turner

In a blind mechanical method, you can blame the methods, when it fail.
Using methods there the player must take decisions, puts the responsibility at the player.

Repeating number is a property of randomness, you can take any numbers, but you know by taking the last shown seven, they at least shows.

It is not very static, you normally end the session in less than 37 spins.

In hundreds of sessions I got some RFH, the winnings have catch up the losses.

I put 1000 units on risk, and gain between 100 and 500 a session.
Then to stop is sometimes hard to decide, but if it hits and I am plus I continue long, until three
losses in a row.

Up to now it has performed very well. Use it at least 10 times a day.

[Iggy]

Hi Ralph;

When you choose the last 7 numbers do you keep those numbers for 37 spins or add the last hit number and remove the number from 8 ago after each spin ?

You must also play a progression right ?

Thanx;
iggy

[Ralph]

I keep the seven last numbers until I stop, start over new last numbers then on some plus.
If I win early and the hits coming I can go until  the streak stops, three loss for example.

The progression is add one at a hitting number. This makes in a winning streak the most hit numbers higher stakes.

The stop/loss is up to the player, but it is better to use small units and many.
With 10 Euro and 0.01 chips it is possible to gain 50-300 units a session, or lose them all.
Rare lucky streaks can win 1000.

If less than 1000 bankroll, do not try.

[GARNabby]

What happened to the other half of the replies in this thread?

link:://:.gamblersglen.com/cgi-bin/teemz/teemz.cgi?board=_master&action=opentopic&topic=2285&forum=General_Discussion

link:://:.gamblersglen.com/cgi-bin/teemz/teemz.cgi?board=_master&action=opentopic&topic=2280&forum=General_Discussion

[Tamino]

CARNabby,



WOW.  With those  2 links  can the board stomach it?  you gave them the whole enchilada.

Tamino

[Skakus]

Take it outside, school boys. 

[Tamino]

Skakus,

?

[Skakus]

Tamino, you say Bayes has been exposed?

I'll show you exposed. I actually have a picture of Bayes and I'm going to post it on the forum. I'll probably get into trouble but so be it.

But no, I don't have a problem at all Tamino. I just don't see the point of all the bickering and waging of verbal wars amongst like minded people.

Anyway I'll post the picture of Bayes which will expose him once and for all!

[Skakus]

 
Bayes exposed >>>

[GARNabby]

Hey, "?"

Are you sure that isn't Victor?

[VLS]

Are you sure that isn't Victor?

LoL

I would never go shirtless.