It is possible to win!

[GARNabby]

I would never go shirtless.

Whom do you think Bayes is holding?

[Ralph]

Some of you may not know how to open your own threads!

[VLS]

Whom do you think Bayes is holding?

hehe, my "making fun of" mode stops at myself 

[GARNabby]

Ralph, I concur.

In the IT field, this is very true.

10 years and you're like a dinosaur!

At the extremes, a formal education doesn't fade, or become obsolete; but a part of who we become.  Like an old Canadian man (, my father,) whose early childhood's first language was German, will subconsciously forget himself and blurt out broken German expletives at times of distress.  Aristotle called this sort of thing a "second nature"; another philosopher, a "blossoming".  Each of which, one's life's vicissitudes or turning-points, hinging and revolving on the others.

And as much as the "dynamic familiarities" of internet, casino, etc, seem to change... not much really ever becomes of any of that.  No critical benefits, promotions or degrees of any kind.  More like a non-activity, which inhibits, and interferes with, the true creative, and then reified, productivity.

"There are [ultimately] no overnight success stories", "we are what we eat [, even from the "tree of knowledge", LoL,] and "good things [do] come to they who wait"... none of which may be "taken from us", or even cast to the side by us.
____________________________

A few of the basic reasons that i find your own experience a bit puzzling, sad, and a shame.

"The wife", as i always seem to put it, had her own fundamentally-bad experiences with such a limited education.  And it peeks through for also her in times of distress, more in terms of "the fetal position" types of gestures, etc... ultimately-less philosophically-rounded, i supposed.

You know, we're all basically of the monkeys, etc, but the idea is to rise above that sort of thing by just that.

[Bayes]

Whom do you think Bayes is holding?

I'm the one being held.

GARNabby,

Is English your first language?

Just asking...

[GARNabby]

I'm the one being held.

GARNabby,

Is English your first language?

Just asking...

I talk whatever, you should know that by now.

[Kingspin]

Yes it's possible to win , but the odds of doing so are set against you more than you think.
Winning and winning consistently are 2 different planets.. Yes you can win but to win consistently no. A definate no....

[vundarosa]

me thinks the poor win goal / stop loss ratio plays a major role.........if having a fairly consistent winning strategy one ought to attempt win heavely so when losing maybe still be ahead....if we win at least half of stop loss per section and win 3 out of 4 sections we could be winning long term.....there should already be strategies able to do this, lose 20 out of 80 section....would still be ahead

vundarosa

[TwoCatSam]

***********Yes you can win but to win consistently no. A definate no....********

I wouldn't tell that to Ralph, Mr J, FLATman, Jl or Victor.  They might not even stop winning long enough to hear you.

TwoCat

[marvin]

can you consistently win 1% of your total bankroll per day?

[dino246]

1% a day,not worth going to a B+M Casino for less than 10%.

Got to be (1) Live Dealer (2) Place all bets AFTER the Dealer has spun the ball.(just my Paranoia)


Regards,

Dino.

[marvin]

1% a day,not worth going to a B+M Casino for less than 10%.

Got to be (1) Live Dealer (2) Place all bets AFTER the Dealer has spun the ball.(just my Paranoia)


Regards,

Dino.

so is it possible/doable?

[Johnlegend]

Yes it's possible to win , but the odds of doing so are set against you more than you think.
Winning and winning consistently are 2 different planets.. Yes you can win but to win consistently no. A definate no....

Kingspin that is the general perception. That isnt the reality for those who know how to win consistently. Do you know the difference? A man who doesn't know how to win consistently will romance negative thoughts and hang on old flawed beliefs about this game. I was once among them.

Once you have proven to yourself that winning consistently is not only possible but you make it happen day to day. You will not hear of such talk again. Several years from now maybe sooner for some, I will have proven that point to many.

[Johnlegend]

***********Yes you can win but to win consistently no. A definate no....********

I wouldn't tell that to Ralph, Mr J, FLATman, Jl or Victor.  They might not even stop winning long enough to hear you.

TwoCat

ABSOLUTELY Sam. For some the mind cannot be altered. As old habits died hard. Old beliefs die even harder.

[Johnlegend]

can you consistently win 1% of your total bankroll per day?

That is relative to the size of your bankroll. If you have 25k. And you win 1% a day are you going to be disappointed? I wouldnt be. If you have 250 points. You will start slowly and build up there is no other way. You run it like a business.

With my challenge on BV, I am not just trying to show that I can win longterm. I am trying to show other members how you grow in proportion to your BR. One of the biggest mistakes in this game is letting greed and impatience get the better of you. And that often comes at a hefty price. When you do eventually lose it can and does destroy your confidence. And once your mind is damaged. You become a bitter sceptic. And outcast from success with this game.

From there on your role is to ridicule and warn off anyone with a positive attitude. And you spend the rest of your existence in the wrong frame of mind. I've seen this many times. Its on this forum too. That's why I have taken it upon myself to show instead of talk of beating this game. In the longrun some positive mind changing will result from it. And that's got to be a good thing.