Ninesector

[Skakus]

Remember the old saying, "you can't change a Leopard's spots"

Well that holds true for the roulette wheel.

Just because you shuffle the numbers around doesn't change the wheel into some other animal. It's still a Leopard and will still behave like a Leopard!

[ignatus]

Mattymattz. Yes, you're right.

Skakus. You're right too!  I'm very still very grateful for that progression idea. I've used it in the 7sector with amazing results. I double after each win for FIVE times, then drop back to 1 unit. (instead of four times as the 9 numbers)... My trial ended for Roulette Xtreme, so I can't make these nice graphs anymore! 

Here are the results for a short session of 7sectors. (@liveroulette. I'm not faking this. These are real results) First test (with that Skakus-style progression!) 

[Droganson]

I am playing this with a 1,2,3,4,5,etc progression and doing incredibly well. Thumbs up from me!

[ignatus]

Droganson. Nice!  You're welcome to post any results (good or bad!)  ideas for progressions with the different bets are also welcome! What program you using with this progression? (3,5,7,9-sector?)...

Thanks to all! You gave me inspiration for this system! (and this forum) without you it would never had happend! 

Cheers

[soggett]

just a quick note;
tested 598 spins with 3 number bet, flatbetting ended +150
going up all the way
so far so good, very good
I'll try to test all versions on a 4000 spins file I have but it will take a while cause i do it manually

[ignatus]

Thanks Soggett! Very happy you got good results! 

[ignatus]

Second test of 7sector.

Neutral trend

[ignatus]

Playing now with 9sector using 9 number progression (111 2 2 3 4 5 6 8 11 16 22). Ended up with +250 units after 60spins. 

But beware of progression? (it's more of hit and run?) because 3 times in a 300spin session I was out of the 13 step progression.

[ignatus]

I post these progressions: 

3 single numbers, 40 steps:
Bankroll = 627
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3
4 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 18

5 number progression using 720 units
25-step progression
1 x 5  30     
2 x 3  60   
3 x 2  90   
4 x 2  130   
5 x 3  205     
6 x 1  235   
7 x 1  270   
8 x 1  310
9 x 1  355
10 x 1 405
11 x 1 460
12 x 1 520
13 x 1 585
14 x 1 655
15 x 1 730     


progression 7 number = 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 2. 2. 3. 3. 4. 5. 6. 8. 10. 12

Progression 9 number = 1 . 1.  1.  2.  2.  3.  4.  5.  7.  9. 12. 16.  22. 30

Cheers

[Turner]

Sam 

Well, first test of 5sector wasn't so impressive... I think the graph was kinda funny, thought this pattern would continue for infinity, so i saw no point continue? I was flatbetting. @live casino .. Some clever progression wouldn't save this either. I belive more in 7sector or 9sector. with 3sector I was very lucky in the first run, but I need more results...

Ignatus....I would deem this graph as a success in an embryonic idea .Allways aim for this pattern initially with any system....then work on the graph going up. As someone said here (VLS???) If you lose, aim to draw. That mantra exists over and over in this graph. You expect too much too quick me thinks.

[Turner]

Hello ig,

It's not a joke, the easy wheel really does work just the same as the French wheel, and it’s so much easier to play.

Test it out for a bit and you will see the behaviours of both type results are identical… Same numbers repeat, same numbers sleep, same size sectors repeat, same size sectors sleep, same clumps appear, same gaps appear… Everything works the same, really.

The easy wheel is much more attuned to the table layout too, allowing you to bet the streets and the lines instead of just the pleins.

I wish RX had a facility to customize the arrangement of the wheel so this could be tested on large number samples, but I already know what the results would be. No surprises for me there, I'm sure.

Now if you were using physics based methods then I would say, don’t be silly you must use the French wheel, but using systems IT MAKES NO DIFFERENCE except for making it much easier to play.

Skakus, why dont you use "numbers" in statistics then? (RX)

[soggett]

not so sure about the progression ignatus, i'm still doing the 3 numbers and i had a 60 spins till hit once, over 40 a couple of times
little update; 2000 spins flat betting = +552 units
hope this continues
for progression i would suggest to raise stakes in cycles, like every 20 spins or so, maybe 30
+1 /-1 reset when in profit (for the 3 numbers I mean)

[ignatus]

Wow!  Very nice Soggett!

[Skakus]

Skakus, why don't you use "numbers" in statistics then? (RX)

I do for some stuff but it would be nice to have a wheel statistics function where you could arrange the pockets how you wish. Lots of good testing applications could result. 

[Turner]

I do for some stuff but it would be nice to have a wheel statistics function where you could arrange the pockets how you wish. Lots of good testing applications could result.

On my rx wish list would be being able to see natural line stats on their own. Currently natural and unnatural together
Turner