4 corners - doz/col-strategy

[ignatus]

From my wicked mind I invented yet another strategy.  Tried it, and to my suprise it worked amazingly well! 80 spins +870 units. (see pic) I used 5 unit bets and a wrong 1,2,3.. progression. (This was play @liveroulette...) Anyway, it's a very simple strategy once you get it. It consider *both* dozen and columns. So, it's 2 dimensional.

1) If column 1 or 3 is hit, (within one dozen) bet 2 corners *opposite the column hit* in each of the two dozens that are not hit.

2) If it keeps repeating within the same dozen keep the same bet, but use 4 corner progression:
1 - 2 - 4 - 7 - 12 - 22... on each corner.

3) If it hits same column but within a new dozen; bet 2 corners in each of those 2 dozens not hit opposite that column . (Using 4 corners progression).

4) If win on middle column, next put a simple two dozen bet on the 2 dozens not hit until column 1 or 3 is hit. (see 1)

Sounds complicated perhaps? But it's real simple... I always use to get a hit on the 1st or 2nd bet.... only flaw with this system if it keeps repeat within the same dozen or column. That's why I recommend progression to guard against that. Perhaps I was lucky that repetition didn't happen for 80 spins? (only 3 times at most) But then i was thinking I can be lucky for 20 or 40 spins, but not 80 spins?? Anyway my first result shows VERY good results...

I will give some examples:

number 6 is hit. (1st col, 1st doz) the bet would be: Corners (13/17), (19/23), (25/29), (31/35).

number 22 is hit. (3rd col, 2nd doz) the bet would be: Corners (2/6), (8/12), (26/30), (32/36)...

Hope I got everything right, and you got my explanation!

Cheers!

[TwoCatSam]

Bro, put an ice pack on your head.  Your circuits are going to overload!  Smoke will come out your ears.  People around you will pour water on your head.

Yep, happened to me!

TCS

[soggett]

dude!!!!

tried a test 59 spin session, flatbetting 8 numbers ( I used 2 column too)
when zero hits i stop and wait for new number
ended + 352 
is this possible?
im gonna need to test this out too
you're making me work my butt off

[ignatus]

Soggett, yes I know!!  don't know why this strategy works so well! LoL

[soggett]

another quick test
122 numbers
again flatbet
ended +868
this is amazing so far and I had 6 zeros in those 122  spins
I'm gonna check more into this when I get time, looks very good for now
thanks for the system

[Tomla021]

see  its working, i think i have a grail(wine included),, old ideas , new ideas-lets go and not be rude etc

[soggett]

ok so I just want to check I got something right
I bet 8 numbers
so I either lose 8 or gain 28, right?
just tested 300 spins flatbetting this baby
guess the result so far?

a whoping +2272 units
flatbetting man

can someone explain why this is going so well?
I mean if after this I get 300 losses in a row I will be around even but dont think thats gonna happen
Did we just strike gold here people?
I'll go through my 4000 spins in a row and see how it fairs, cant wait

[soggett]

ok so I just want to check I got something right
I bet 8 numbers
so I either lose 8 or gain 28, right?
just tested 300 spins flatbetting this baby
guess the result so far?

a whoping +2272 units
flatbetting man

can someone explain why this is going so well?
I mean if after this I get 300 losses in a row I will be around even but don't think that's gonna happen
Did we just strike gold here people?
I'll go through my 4000 spins in a row and see how it fairs, can't wait

I have answered my own question
forgive me I haven't sleep at all last night so...
we bet 16 numbers not 8 LoL
gotto redo all now
my bad

[buffalowizard]

Damn soggett I don't think i can forgive you, I was getting more excited by you r results than jimmy saville in an orphanage 

[ignatus]

Holy f**k Soggett! That't mindblowing!! My second result was +855 units in 80 spins. But I consider this a "bad run" because it was much repeats, I used the 4 corners progression (1 - 2 - 4 - 7 - 12 - 22) reached the end of the progression once, reached table-limit 100 units (playing  with 5 unit bet).

[Turner]

Holy f**k Soggett! That't mindblowing!! My second result was +855 units in 80 spins. But I consider this a "bad run" because it was much repeats, I used the 4 corners progression (1 - 2 - 4 - 7 - 12 - 22) reached the end of the progression once, reached table-limit 100 units (playing  with 5 unit bet).

Ignatus....please be very careful. something you said predicts disaster

reached the end of the progression once, reached table-limit 100 units (playing  with 5 unit bet).
No system has found the way to unlock roulette. if you are throwing silly money at it...it doesnt work.

[ignatus]

Turner, Yes you're right. Progression is dangerous.

Soggett flatbetting this method and have very good results! Usually it hits after 1 or 2 spins. Repeats happen now and then. I rather see a longer progression than this one (1 - 2 - 4 - 7 - 12 - 22) it's too short! OR an alternative progression method, i used 1,2,3,4... progression in the first run. hm 

[Turner]

Ignatus,

i would be asking why it failed 5 times if Im on the 5th progression.

This idea, in my view, is predicting that when something happens in col 1/3, then something else should happen rigidly everytime some where else. It wont. Try thinking sleepers/repeaters. At least you are making some kind of prediction and the idea has some logic attached. Like the sector idea you had. Hits do clump up on the wheel, and it makes sense to bet in an area on the wheel that is "hot".

As i mentioned many times, I play Chess. One of the big realisations in chess is when you see that small imbalances are clues to play. The imbalances in the position are temporary. 3 or 4 moves.
I see similar in Roulette. The marque can show imbalances in the position...say 0,32 and 12 have hit in the last 5. Its worth 0/3, 12/15,26,32/35 for a couple of pops. Not all night! Just when you see the imbalance.

When I was in the casino on Saturday, I won well with Ralphs lucky 7. I didnt play it until a dealer changed and he spun 13 twice in a row. I thought it was worth a pop for a few spins, and I guessed right.
When i stopped (nothing had repeated in the last 9), i saw 13 hit and played 31. Why? You see 13/31 follow each other a lot. 21/12 too.
I played it on its own. It went in 31 and came out into 14. So I read the signs and played it again.
It hit!. I stopped playing it. 13/31 had its moment. It was 2 spins. If you see 13 and play 31 for 45 spins with progression, what are you actually doing it for?

What am I trying to say?. Dont blindly stick with the same idea over and over with massive progressions. It may of been " the right moment" to play it when you started, but by the time you are on the 5th progression, the "right moment" has long gone.

I think the longer you do something for, the more your luck runs out.

i think luck comes in small packages!
Turner

[Robeenhuut]

Ignatus,

i would be asking why it failed 5 times if I'm on the 5th progression.

This idea, in my view, is predicting that when something happens in col 1/3, then something else should happen rigidly everytime some where else. It won't. Try thinking sleepers/repeaters. At least you are making some kind of prediction and the idea has some logic attached. Like the sector idea you had. Hits do clump up on the wheel, and it makes sense to bet in an area on the wheel that is "hot".

As i mentioned many times, I play Chess. One of the big realisations in chess is when you see that small imbalances are clues to play. The imbalances in the position are temporary. 3 or 4 moves.
I see similar in Roulette. The marquee can show imbalances in the position...say 0,32 and 12 have hit in the last 5. Its worth 0/3, 12/15,26,32/35 for a couple of pops. Not all night! Just when you see the imbalance.

When I was in the casino on Saturday, I won well with Ralphs lucky 7. I didn't play it until a dealer changed and he spun 13 twice in a row. I thought it was worth a pop for a few spins, and I guessed right.
When i stopped (nothing had repeated in the last 9), i saw 13 hit and played 31. Why? You see 13/31 follow each other a lot. 21/12 too.
I played it on its own. It went in 31 and came out into 14. So I read the signs and played it again.
It hit!. I stopped playing it. 13/31 had its moment. It was 2 spins. If you see 13 and play 31 for 45 spins with progression, what are you actually doing it for?

What am I trying to say?. don't blindly stick with the same idea over and over with massive progressions. It may of been " the right moment" to play it when you started, but by the time you are on the 5th progression, the "right moment" has long gone.

I think the longer you do something for, the more your luck runs out.

i think luck comes in small packages!
Turner

Yeah Turner

I like sometimes a numerology approach or Voodoo in Sam's vocabulary.  My favorite is 0,10,20,30 combo.  At least you feel better when you lose compared to losing long progression 

[Turner]

Yeah Turner

I like sometimes a numerology approach or Voodoo in Sam's vocabulary.  My favorite is 0,10,20,30 combo.  At least you feel better when you lose compared to losing long progression 

Rob...and it has a small window of opportunity I think. Perhaps I'm wrong...

If all you can dance is the waltz, you can dance, but you arnt a dancer yet.