Less is more...

[ignatus]

Tried to find an easy system that can be grinded. From a lot of testing many variations/combinations with many chips on the table none of them worked.

Now, I tried a different approach. Flatbet 2 doublestreets. Well, what happen? Bankroll increase! Strange. This is cannot be just "beginners luck"? Or maybe it was?  I've done 2 quick tests: Played with two doublestreets 25 unit bets and grinded myself up to +1000 etc. (practice mode RNG roulette),

Ofcourse like all systems you can have good streaks and bad streaks.

[ignatus]

I tested this 4 times now (with 25 unit bets):

+1000
+1000
+1000
+1000

Each time.

[ausguy]

Practice mode = easier suck in mode on RNG. Real play is where they take your money.

Why not use live dealer spins? There's plenty of those available with free play & play money chips linked to the live spins. Maybe spins recorded at your favourite local casino could be used too? Smart live has a recorded list of the previous 185 spins available on there graphic display for example.

Test wins on live dealer would be more valid. Win more often then lose over multiple tests should indicate a viable live dealer bet method?

Regards,  Ausguy.

[ignatus]

Well, result are the same +68 units (flatbetting 2 doublestreets 1 unit bets) 300 spins or so (from a list of livespins)...

If that would have been 25 unit bets i'd won 1700 units. (68*25=1700).

[Turner]

Ignatus
Can you confirm that you understood me when i said that basic ideas that havnt been tested should be in notepad.
Turner

[buffalowizard]

Ignatus
Ausguy is right, fun mode is a waste of time and not to be trusted. Check out the actuals page on this site and compare against real life spins , say about 1000 and then maybe you have something.
In real world betting static 12 numbers ain't gonna cut it I'm afraid
Love your enthusiasm though
BW

[ignatus]

Turner. Yes..I did a lot of testing for this one. I came upon this strategy by accident (2 doublestreets) and it works.

Argument that RNG roulette is favored to win is not true, try any strategy you want (I tried many with RNG) most of them fail (in practice mode). But now I've tested this with real spins & RNG. Result are the same.

[ignatus]

In real world betting static 12 numbers ain't gonna cut it I'm afraid

Well, winning 5-6 times in a row +1000 units doesn't mean anything? THAT doesn't just "happen" by accident. 

I'm just sharing what I tested so far. Try it yourself? You can't argue it doesn't work if you never tried it? 

[ignatus]

Played now again won 1000 units flatbetting. (7th time now). Ofcourse it require alot of spins, and losses can happen, but it tend to recover.

[Turner]

Ignatus...what BW means is 12 is 12 is12. The stats show how a dozen or column will sleep. The stats for 2 lines are identical....3 combos of 2 lines are actually dozens!
I wouldnt test this because i know how dozens can sleep
Thats what BW means and i guess the reason he wont test it either
Turner

[ignatus]

As you wish. But I think it's not very clever to dismiss a strategy when you have never tried it. Even if you think you're a "roulette expert" I've only had good result so far (as you know). I think a progression could be used also for 2 doublestreets with no problem. Most I've seen is 13 spins without hit.

If you put doublestreets on (10/15) & (22/27) it cover all three dozens.

If you start progression after the third spin you would reach the 10th step in the progression (28 units) ...in the worst case (13 spins without hit etc), but MOST of the time it hits within 5 spins...

2 Double Streets (each)
1 1 2 3 4 6 8 12 19 28 42 65 100 150 300

Flatbetting without progression works good also.

[Turner]

As you wish. But I think it's not very clever to dismiss a strategy when you have never tried it. Even if you think you're a "roulette expert" I've only had good result so far (as you know). I think a progression could be used also for 2 doublestreets with no problem. Most I've seen is 13 spins without hit.

If you put doublestreets on (10/15) & (22/27) it cover all three dozens.

If you start progression after the third spin you would reach the 10th step in the progression (28 units) ...in the worst case (13 spins without hit etc), but MOST of the time it hits within 5 spins...

2 Double Streets (each)
1 1 2 3 4 6 8 12 19 28 42 65 100 150 300

Flatbetting without progression works good also.

Ignatus
You don't have to be a roulette expert to know dozens can sleep for 25 spins. Why don't You know this stuff?. You are going to crash and burn if you ignore the very basic stats.

[niksa]

Ignatus,sorry for asking but how old are You? When I read your posts You sound like a person which yesterday saw roulette table at first time,and here comes up with ideas that have been tried a thousands times with a lot of pepole. Don't understand me maliciously,but do not let people laught to You.

Have a nice time 

[Proofreaders2000]

If you put doublestreets on (10/15) & (22/27) it cover all three dozens.--Ignatus

There could be something to what you've said
(I have a similar strategy called Edward Dozens)

Check this out Ignatus.

Your two doublestreets.  Every time a number hits in one of them, place a chip on the number.  Keep placing chips as the numbers come in those doublestreets until a hit.

[ignatus]

Thanks Proof

niksa. Well, if you done a 1000 session with this strategy, you could show me the results? Then you would be rich by this time. "what other people has tried?" Really? I tested different strategies I invented myself, (this one too) and saw the bankroll increase or decrease.  I played 2 doublestreet 7 sessions in a row i won +1000 units. Could this just be beginners luck? How is that possible?

I think turners argument is invalid also. A dozen is NOT same as 2 doublestreets.

Say what you will. I was only happy for these good results I've had. :/