An open message to FlAtMaN

[TwoCatSam]

Sir

I really take exception with your statement that I might be jerking you around.  (my words)

I have spent many hours studying this system and the others you posted.  I quickly built my own mechanical tracker and spent hours learning to use it.  I ran three old sheets of mine with tremendous results.  I posted each sheet.  You were complimentary then!

I paid $50 to have a splits clicker made that would put down the splits in quick fashion.

You honestly think I did all that just to come back and jerk you around? 

Frankly, in spite of your vitriol, I think you very well may have a winning system--if the player can stand the progression.

And, FlAtMaN, you stated that we must use a tracker.  I am not the only one who thought a tracker was already programmed and ready to use.  Who would want to make you a tracker when you get so angry when a person tries to understand?

When time permits, I will check a couple of your latest trots and see what I come up with. 

Sam

[Ralph]

I never try the flats systems, the post is some few words and Excel sheet which as usually here are to much buggy, the discussions goes how to read and understand to that level the poster find he has post some which the poster has to make correction in.  Checked against history I do not have so much trust in, the real numbers speak, the test numbers will never repeat.

Frankly! if I do not get it explained first time so I get it, and besides think I will try, I just do not give it a futher thought.  We see everything, bet so, and bet opposite may all works?
Some of GLC is very sophisticated but done for an Amercan  casino using 5 dollar bets and go for a few.

I saw once a posted method (flat?) which says play on ALL cols but double in the middle, That is just a signal to not pay more attention.

Rolling system on 50% or more of the table works with small winnings, until Lady Luck wants it back with interest. F and JL have used that.

[ddarko]

@ FlAtMaN

Sammy is as honest as the day is long 

It probably all just been a bit "lost in translation" 2Cats is here to help, of that there is no doubt 



P.S. Don't watch the film "lost in translation" it's 2 hours of your life your never getting back 

[FlAtMaN]

Sorry Sam if you understand it thatway...I didn't get angry at all,it's just our medditeranian way of expression.We just couldn't understand each other....and I got tired of repeating over and over the very same thing...you didn't get that follow the last 9 IS ONE BET.....and follow the last/further 9
IS ONE DIFFERENT BET.After all it was clearly explained in my first introduction rules excel.
You are quite right that I have here a winning method......the reason it was post/otherwise wouldn't/couse such where conditions ruled by a guy for whom I posted it.....that all my winning
sessions there must be tested with a tracker.......and should match my results...as doinb this by a hand there are possibilities of making errors.......and in replay 31 you can see all my winnings,
in other words I should get that money from him after the testing is done...I can't openly talk about
it here but you can p.m. Sogget/as he is my countryman/and he will tell you all the story behind all
this.Never the less I might find someone to do a tracker,but again condition of our bet was couple or more trackers so that each matches each....wee see.And don't worry am not a guy to have issues with anybody,let alone you.....man two of us almost 140 years

[buffalowizard]

The problem is sam, Flat is how we say in my neck of the woods, a 'grumpy old git'
He also finds any criticism hard to bear

[FlAtMaN]

I never try the flats systems, the post is some few words and Excel sheet which as usually here are to much buggy, the discussions goes how to read and understand to that level the poster find he has post some which the poster has to make correction in.  Checked against history I do not have so much trust in, the real numbers speak, the test numbers will never repeat.

Frankly! if I do not get it explained first time so I get it, and besides think I will try, I just do not give it a futher thought.  We see everything, bet so, and bet opposite may all works?
Some of GLC is very sophisticated but done for an Amercan  casino using 5 dollar bets and go for a few.

I saw once a posted method (flat?) which says play on ALL cols but double in the middle, That is just a signal to not pay more attention.

Rolling system on 50% or more of the table works with small winnings, until Lady Luck wants it back with interest. F and JL have used that.

Ralph,

You,as far as I'm personally concern,are indirectly insulting me.Why?
Suggesting that my excel numbers are fabricated......can't you read and check it with Wiesbaden,
you also can check/or any body else also/that i have downloaded each and every excel over 300 spins,all bay date,table,and suggesting something like against me can only man that is probably able to do something like that.Case finish.

[FlAtMaN]

@ FlAtMaN

Sammy is as honest as the day is long 

It probably all just been a bit "lost in translation" 2Cats is here to help, of that there is no doubt 



P.S. Don't watch the film "lost in translation" it's 2 hours of your life your never getting back 

I know that much longer then you.....he addmited the other day that as he gets olgder he is forgeting things.......lol.....I am drinking MUMIO to get younger.

[Turner]

its a well documented fact that when a person gets slightly emmotional in their second or third language, they dont have enough knowledge of that language to be subtle or diplomatic.

Flat would say, "its in the exel sheet, go and read it, Im not explaining it again."
I would say " before I explain it again, just take another look at my exel sheet, Im sure I explained it correctly"

Drazen_Cro sounds aweful when he tries to push an issue in English.

When a true English speaker is arrogant, he cares not to fill in the words with politeness. Thats because he is arrogant. When a foreigner speaks english, he doesnt have the knowledge to fill in the words with politeness. Thats why he sounds arrogant.

Turner

[ddarko]

I know that much longer then you.....

Your making assumptions there FlAtMaN 

[buffalowizard]

Turner
What if a foreigner is a grumpy old git on top of English as third language - surely a recipe for disaster!

[FlAtMaN]

its a well documented fact that when a person gets slightly emmotional in their second or third language, they don't have enough knowledge of that language to be subtle or diplomatic.

Flat would say, "its in the exel sheet, go and read it, I'm not explaining it again."
I would say " before I explain it again, just take another look at my exel sheet, I'm sure I explained it correctly"

Drazen_Cro sounds aweful when he tries to push an issue in English.

When a true English speaker is arrogant, he cares not to fill in the words with politeness. that's because he is arrogant. When a foreigner speaks English, he doesn't have the knowledge to fill in the words with politeness. that's why he sounds arrogant.

Turner

Poor me.What would you expect.If I write book and give you to read it,you also expect me to explain meaning of each word of the book.It beats me.

[FlAtMaN]

Turner
What if a foreigner is a grumpy old git on top of English as third language - surely a recipe for disaster!

--Bravo......hope you get my years...with your insulting behaviour you surely wont.
--In my country they shoot ppl.like you........and if you told me this in my face you would
be gone you jerk.

[Skakus]

--Bravo......hope you get my years...with your insulting behaviour you surely won't.
--In my country they shoot people.like you........and if you told me this in my face you would
be gone you jerk.

  Take a chill pill dude. 

[Turner]

Poor me.What would you expect.If I write book and give you to read it,you also expect me to explain meaning of each word of the book.It beats me.

No need to be like that

Well if it beats you then it can only mean that you think your explainations of your systems are easy to follow

[TwoCatSam]

OK gentlemen

I think I finally understand where the FlAtMaN is coming from on this system.  The test is to run his numbers as I understand the system and see if I get the same results.  If I do, then I've got it.

If any of you guys have ever studied Neuro-linguistic programming, you would know that people hear things differently than they are spoken.  Some  people can't hear things at all--they are visual people and must see it in writing.

I must see it in a picture that suits my brain.  I will work on this tonight and post my results.

Sam