An open message to FlAtMaN

[Stepkevh]

youre right, i forgot to change the l/w validating :-)

gonna fix it

[Stepkevh]

Voila these should be good now

Stephan

[Stepkevh]

ow, doesn't it change on a loss ??

I mean when zero falls, does it need to stay on the same bets ?

[soggett]

yes, but not after zero
after zero it stays the same
everything else seems fine now
thanks again
now testing is going to be a breeze

[soggett]

sry Stepkevh
but theres still something wrong with the furthest
I think it doesnt calculate the right splits
it tells to bet the last split that hit
I dont know

[Stepkevh]

Sorry guys that i was gone suddenly but the electricity fell out overhere.

This morning when i woke up everything was okay again.

Normally the trackers are good now.

Let me know if not, with maybe a screenshot.

Stef

[Robeenhuut]

"....be a real tester"

Still

One question. How many sessions here would you like to test to make a decision if this is worth playing?  If it wins 30 times in a row and you need 20/1 strike rate to break even it indicates for some thats a good method. Its based on catching repeaters and having large enough BR to survive draw downs. In my opinion you can apply this concept to any EC. If repeaters prevail over chops you win most of the time but if opposite happens occasionally you will lose your BR.     

[Still]

Still

One question. How many sessions here would you like to test to make a decision if this is worth playing?  If it wins 30 times in a row and you need 20/1 strike rate to break even it indicates for some that's a good method. Its based on catching repeaters and having large enough BR to survive draw downs. In my opinion you can apply this concept to any EC. If repeaters prevail over chops you win most of the time but if opposite happens occasionally you will lose your BR. 

Well there's somebody here willing to pay FlatMan decent $ for a well tested system that stands up to many winning sessions in a row (30) with the idea that is enough to make it worth playing.  My standards might equal that if i am interested in getting lucky for a few weeks.  I would do more extensive testing if i was interested in systematically winning over several years.  The question is always, how promising must a system be for me to invest in programming my own test. 

I want to know how occasionally a set BR would be lost...what size the BR needs to be for 30 winning sessions to be common...how much per session average gain.  Most importantly, i want to see a chart of the output...different charts depending on different input.  I want to see what it does flat over a long time and how a progression helps it (or not). 

FlatMan is asking for testers, not guesses on how it will perform.  Would you be willing to add a tracker to the mix?  If not, why not?

[soggett]

Sorry guys that i was gone suddenly but the electricity fell out overhere.

This morning when i woke up everything was okay again.

Normally the trackers are good now.

Let me know if not, with maybe a screenshot.

Stef

Stef I hate doing this to you, but...

look at the screen
this happens, but if I use the last or the zero then the next furthest is ok
maybe just that cell is wrong?

[Stepkevh]

soggett,

no problem at all.

If there is a mistake then it must be said so that i can give a look at it and fix it 

[Stepkevh]

Voila,

And if there's still a problem let me know.
I'm here to solve it :-)

Stef

[soggett]

thank you
It works fine now
gonna do some testing

[soggett]

ok, please don't kill me
I don't know
I tried the rng version and I noticed this again
this is from the manual version
I inputed the number from the rng version just to be sure

[Stepkevh]

no prob, will have another look :-)

[Stepkevh]

Okay, i think i finally solved the problem 

I kept the F9 button pressed and let the sheet scroll trough 500 numbers for a minute
and did'nt notice any error anymore.

Stephan