The Grandpa Way Reloaded

[Amazin]

Ok guys, most of you probably never heard of this. If you want to see the original thread, its here:

link:://:.vlsroulette.com/index.php?topic=6273.0

Its a very long thread and very confusing. It will take you a while to get used to it. However, the good news is that I have done the hard work for all of you by understanding it.

So please pay attention to the rules and I also believe that I might have enhance it hence why its called reloaded. I haven't tried it myself yet so I thought I just get it out here so people can test it. Its quite accurate and even freaky sometimes.

Anyways:

Divide the roulette board into 9 number sectors. e.g. 1-9 10-18 19-27 28-36

Look for 2 numbers that belong to the same sector that just appeared. e.g. 18,20   28,30  3,9

then wait for 2 spins to go pass, then put a unit on each of the 9 numbers. The payout is 4:1 so use progression accordingly. Stop if you miss 3 times.

Wait for another 2 number from the same section and do the same until you hit. Always stop if you miss 3 times and just wait for the next 2 numbers from the same sector.

If anyone can test this, it would be great.

[Amazin]

Hello? This is one of the best system I hae ever studied and no replies? Much better than ignatus's systems

[buffalowizard]

Thanks for the simple explanation amazin
I remember this from the old days but couldnt decipher it so well done!

[jarabo002]

Thanks Amazing, it was not easy to understand in VLSroulette. At least for me.


Which progresion can we apply?

[Amazin]

Yeah, I was one of the few people who actually understood it and I believe I have enhanced it.

So the payout is 4:1 so progression should be:

level 1: 1 unit on each number so thats 9 units

level 2: same

Level 3: same

Level 4: 2 units on each number

Level 5: same

I think its best to play this with other systems but it is definately one of the best system I have ever played and certainly worth exploring further. I have 1000s of real spin numbers and I would say, 90% of the time, the same sector will hit again within 5 spins. Its freaky, trust me. If you have some real spin numbers, see for yourself.

[kevint3]

"Look for 2 numbers that belong to the same sector that just appeared. e.g. 18,20   28,30  3,9"


Do these 2 numbers have to be back to back appearing?  If not how far apart must they appear?

[vladir]

IT seems interesting.... maybe someone can code this i RX and see how it goes with some real spins?

[GLC]

Amazin,  You seem to have whittled this thing down quite a bit from what the original author wrote.  You have fewer 9 number sectors and you have eliminated the neighbors bets.  You also seem to have eliminated seeking the patterns he spoke about.

Are you convinced that your way of interpreting his system works?

If so, he sure spent a lot of time and words confusing everyone for no good reason that I can think of.  Unless it was because he had the "grail" if you could understand his whole approach.

GLC

[Smoczoor]

GLC if u understand this system maybe could u translate it to us? PLEASE...

[Amazin]

"Look for 2 numbers that belong to the same sector that just appeared. e.g. 18,20   28,30  3,9"


Do these 2 numbers have to be back to back appearing?  If not how far apart must they appear?

Yep, back to back. My research also shows that it doesn't matter so much if there is another number in between but for now, just stick to back to back.

@GLC: Feel free to add anything you want after all this is what this forum is for. Can you explain what you mean by fewer 9 number sectors and neighboring bets? If you checkout that thread,  you will see the exercise i did and Wahome confirmed it that I was right. In the end of the day, you are still betting 9 numbers so it doesn't make that much difference. Like I said, I have some real spins from smart live casino and my method works. This is why I'm posting because I want further testing.

[Smoczoor]

Amazin you have right - i back to original method on VLS forum... I read all 20 pages, found your posts. Now im playing your method and it works. I will post my results tommorow...

Best Regards
Michael

[Smoczoor]

BTW - it is message for GLC (with all due respect)

Amazin modify original method and share it with us, so if u want be useful just test it like i do...

all the best

[GLC]

by the way - it is message for GLC (with all due respect)

Amazin modify original method and share it with us, so if u want be useful just test it like i do...

all the best

Hey fellas, I wasn't trying to be critical,  I just never could decipher the bad English in the original method.  Waaahome re-states the system in reply #9 and you will notice these 2 lines:
"you bet all around those numbers, straigt up and on splits so for $1 chip u have $21 total.......

plus I bet the numbers beside and stock up on a repeat hoping it will hit...and IT WILL........"

I was just asking about Amazin's tweaks vs the original. 

Unfortunately, this is not the kind of method I like to play.  To do it Waaahome's way, takes way too much pre-bet analysis.  Maybe that's what it takes to play the HG, if so, count me out.

The way Amazin has presented it, seems to be much more playable but I have no time for in depth analysis or testing at this time so I won't be very useful to you. 

I will state the obvious if you don't mind.  Testing only shows if the system is one you personally like to play.  It never proves that it's the stone cold mortals winner.  As has been shown many times, a system can win for thousands of spins and then tank big time.  We just never know. 

Even with a 2 or 3% advantage, because of spin fluctuations, you could go broke with all but the largest banks.  Unless you play with a flat bet, but that doesn't seem to be the suggested bet method.  So a stop loss is for sure in order.

I'll stop interupting your post now.

Good Luck to you guys,

GLC

[GLC]

So using the term "Holy Grail" is taboo? 

When I use the term, it's for a reason.  Having a program change it to "method" weakens my point.

Is this manipulation of posts an admin decision or is it the will of the the members?  And what possible rationale can this represent?

[marvin]

by the way - it is message for GLC (with all due respect)

Amazin modify original method and share it with us, so if u want be useful just test it like i do...

all the best

woohhh ... relax dude 
im on the same boat with GLC in understanding gramps system and besides amazin said that this a tweak of gramps system.

the way i understand gramps system its more flexible than amazin's tweak. we can bet numbers 4-12(i could be wrong) instead of just sticking to 1-9 or 10-18
i believe amazin tweaked gramps system so that we can clearly understand it.