200k spins and well ahead

[Robeenhuut]

Its my take on extensive testing and conclusions being made from results.  I posted this before.
Betting for another repeat after a line repeats - so after you see 55 you bet 5. 21 step progression for a total risk of around 160 units. Strike rate to break even 37/1  So far after  around 3600 games  strike rate around 100/1.  37 loses. Few winning streaks over 200.  Around 50 spins on average for a game so its around 180k spins.  Would you consider it a good method based on these stats? 
Just a food for thought.

[TwoCatSam]

Clarification, please............

OK, you get the 5 followed by the 5.  Now, do you begin betting the five and continue until it hits

Or

Do you bet for a single three-peat and move on if it loses?

5 5 2..........loss..........continue with 5

Or

5 5 2.........look for new double?

3 3............

8 8 ...........

Sam

[Robeenhuut]

Clarification, please............

OK, you get the 5 followed by the 5.  Now, do you begin betting the five and continue until it hits

Or

Do you bet for a single three-peat and move on if it loses?

5 5 2..........loss..........continue with 5

Or

5 5 2.........look for new double?

3 3............

8 8 ...........

Sam

You always look for a new double and adjust your progression.

[TwoCatSam]

This sounds like a pretty good system.

No one will pay any attention to it!!   

LOL

Sam

[Stepkevh]

i did pay attention to it     

[Stepkevh]

so if i understand correctly

you wait for the double trigger and then bet for your first step of the progression.

if it wins -> new game
if it loses -> wait for other double trigger and bet 2nd step of progr ?

[TwoCatSam]

Sorry, Stef

Just naturally thought you'd be reading the latest from ignatus!

How rich is he now?  I forget........

Sam

[Robeenhuut]

Guys

My point is that you go through fluctuations with your methods. You hit 200+ winning streaks but also pretty close loses to each other. As a matter of fact i just ran few quick sessions and had 2 loses in 15 games  Some methods hold very well in a large number of games but suddenly losing streaks start to appear much often. Its pointless to predict a strike rate in the long run.
I just mentioned this method because it behaved remarkably steady overall.

[Stepkevh]

Sam,

No didnt read his post yet.

Well actually, i've read one of his first and it said enough :-)

[Ralph]

There is no longer series which is the same. test while play.
I may script this but have to be sure I got the rules. It has to be played at a table with no free spins.

So I think of random bet 1 cent while tracking, and  0.5 Euro after trigger.
What is the progression in detail.

Do we wait for two hits in a row on a line, and bet for the line to come the third time?

When it does not hit the third time, do we then retrack and start over using the next step in the progression?

Are we using the six lines or even the 5 other.

I think this method can win or lose and it dependes on  things we can't predict.

[Robeenhuut]

There is no longer series which is the same. test while play.
I may script this but have to be sure I got the rules. It has to be played at a table with no free spins.

So I think of random bet 1 cent while tracking, and  0.5 Euro after trigger.
What is the progression in detail.

Do we wait for two hits in a row on a line, and bet for the line to come the third time?

When it does not hit the third time, do we then retrack and start over using the next step in the progression?

Are we using the six lines or even the 5 other.

I think this method can win or lose and it dependes on  things we can't predict.

You are right.  I did not post it as a winning method  but just to show that any method can act as a winning one in a long run. This one is not different. 

[Ralph]

I coded it the way I understand the method, and  run it for 980 spins with 38 units profit. It was down about 45 at most. The script place one small chip on red until a trigger, and then bet on the line, goes back to bet red upon a loss and continue the next trigger.

I have not fixed indexoutofbounds in the script yet, I never climbet so high in the progression.
The session should be reset after a win, to start the progression all over.

Code (javascript) Select Expand

pos=0;
   var i =0;
  var index=0;
   posarr = new Array(1,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20);
   s0 = ",1,2,3,4,5,6,";
   s1 = ",7,8,9,10,11,12,";
   s2 = ",13,14,15,16,,17,18,";
   s3 = ",19,20,21,22,23,24,";
   s4 = ",25,26,27,28,29,30,";
   s5 = ",31,32,33,34,35,36,";
   rarr = new Array(s0,s1,s2,s3,s4,s5);
   barr = new Array("1d6","7d12","13d18","19d24","25d30","31d36");
   var koll = new Array();
   var ret = "";
  function extfunc(number,betsize, bet){
     if(number=="0") return "rr"+ "/0";
      for(i=0;i<6;i++){
         if( rarr[i].indexOf("," + number + ",")>-1){
              koll[koll.length] = i;
              index = i;
         }
     }

     if(koll.length>1){
         if(koll[koll.length-1] == koll[koll.length-2]){
           pos = pos +1;ret="";
            for(j=0;j<pos;j++){
               ret = ret + "," + barr[index];
            }

            return ret + "/" + betsize;

         } else {
            return "rr" + "/0";
         }
     } else {
        return   "rr" + "/0";
     }
  }

[Robeenhuut]

I coded it the way I understand the method, and  run it for 980 spins with 38 units profit. It was down about 45 at most. The script place one small chip on red until a trigger, and then bet on the line, goes back to bet red upon a loss and continue the next trigger.

I have not fixed indexoutofbounds in the script yet, I never climbet so high in the progression.
The session should be reset after a win, to start the progression all over.

Code (javascript) Select Expand

pos=0;
   var i =0;
  var index=0;
   posarr = new Array(1,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20);
   s0 = ",1,2,3,4,5,6,";
   s1 = ",7,8,9,10,11,12,";
   s2 = ",13,14,15,16,,17,18,";
   s3 = ",19,20,21,22,23,24,";
   s4 = ",25,26,27,28,29,30,";
   s5 = ",31,32,33,34,35,36,";
   rarr = new Array(s0,s1,s2,s3,s4,s5);
   barr = new Array("1d6","7d12","13d18","19d24","25d30","31d36");
   var koll = new Array();
   var ret = "";
  function extfunc(number,betsize, bet){
     if(number=="0") return "rr"+ "/0";
      for(i=0;i<6;i++){
         if( rarr[i].indexOf("," + number + ",")>-1){
              koll[koll.length] = i;
              index = i;
         }
     }

     if(koll.length>1){
         if(koll[koll.length-1] == koll[koll.length-2]){
           pos = pos +1;ret="";
            for(j=0;j<pos;j++){
               ret = ret + "," + barr[index];
            }

            return ret + "/" + betsize;

         } else {
            return "rr" + "/0";
         }
     } else {
        return   "rr" + "/0";
     }
  }

Thanks for testing Ralph. This bet just illustrates that with a long progression you can get very good results in the long run with any method. Btw betting for just a single repeat here also produced a very good run in around 2k games. But its not what i would play.

[Ralph]

I think I have posted before a test I did using just one straight up. It could stand 400 sleeping spins for a number, if it come once. I bet one unit and add an unit after a win and not new high. It could take several thousend spins to end, but ended plus. Not well ahead if we see to the number of spins, but still ahead. As soon the number clustered the recover was speedy.

[Ralph]

Did a try using the script. This time bet the same unit size on the lines as on the red. Using 0.01 chip, set the wintarget to 100 unit and started the bot. Needed  56  spins until it stopped with 139 units plus.