• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Almost every system has been tested many times before. Start by learning what we already know doesn't work, and why.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

My Best Guess at a Test of the L v F System

Started by TwoCatSam, Nov 25, 11:48 AM 2012

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

TwoCatSam

Two bad trots in two days.

This should make Matt smile!!

Sam
If dogs don't go to heaven, when I die I want to go where dogs go.  ...Will Rogers

Skakus

A ship moored in the harbour is safe, but that's not what ships are made for.

Robeenhuut

Quote from: TwoCatSam on Dec 10, 11:54 PM 2012
Two bad trots in two days.

This should make Matt smile!!

Sam

Sam

I dont have any personal agenda on this forum. I just dont like people relentlessly pushing their ideas and branding them "constant winning bets" as it was the case with Flat. It started with "Promised constant winning bet" thread and continued with a whole array of off shots involving sectors,splits,lines,finales etc. Recently we had some stories about some bets and guy winning 270000 Euros with this method after he lost a bet with Flat for 1000 Euro. Thanks to Stef tracker the testing can be done quickly and it just shows that this is just as randomly winning bet as any method. And im actually sad  after all this hype.  :-X

Regards
Matt

TwoCatSam

Matt

You've struck me as a fine feller as long as I've been reading your posts.  I agree--too much bloviation ruins the stew!!

People get excited!  I speak from personal experience.  I have told my wife things I later regretted.  I thought a system was infallable only to find out I was riding a trend.  Now I say to myself daily, "This is a test.  This is only a test."

Do I have high hopes for the L v F?  You bet!  Will it fail?  Who knows?  Is there even a test that can definitively say that a system works or fails?  Probably not.  So I just plod along, cutting and pasting, hoping for the best.

I will say this:  Because of all the testing and studying I have done, I am further down the road to success than I was three or four years ago so all the work has not been in vain.  I have learned the only true way to ever win is to ride a positive trend.  FlAtMaN's L v F tries to do that.  It goes with the wind, not against it.

I feel that when I succeed--and I will--I will have turned a fascinating study and search into a low-paying part-time job.

Sam
If dogs don't go to heaven, when I die I want to go where dogs go.  ...Will Rogers

Still

Quote from: TwoCatSam on Dec 11, 01:10 AM 2012

I feel that when I succeed--and I will--I will have turned a fascinating study and search into a low-paying part-time job.

Sam

My sincere best wishes for that.

tonynewlife

Ok guys here are my results for the whole month of december 2011.  As you can see it's in the negative zone.

Tony

speed

Quote from: Robeenhuut on Dec 11, 12:44 AM 2012
Sam

I don't have any personal agenda on this forum. I just don't like people relentlessly pushing their ideas and branding them "constant winning bets" as it was the case with Flat. It started with "Promised constant winning bet" thread and continued with a whole array of off shots involving sectors,splits,lines,finales etc. Recently we had some stories about some bets and guy winning 270000 Euros with this method after he lost a bet with Flat for 1000 Euro. Thanks to Stef tracker the testing can be done quickly and it just shows that this is just as randomly winning bet as any method. And I'm actually sad  after all this hype.  :-X

Regards

I am signing this.

TwoCatSam

tony

How could you lose less than 400?  You either go until you win 72 or lose 400.  One was -54 or something.  I don't understand.

But thanks for testing.  I'll plod along.  Just kiillin' time 'till Jesus comes.

Sam
If dogs don't go to heaven, when I die I want to go where dogs go.  ...Will Rogers

tonynewlife

Quote from: TwoCatSam on Dec 11, 01:25 PM 2012
tony

How could you lose less than 400?  You either go until you win 72 or lose 400.  One was -54 or something.  I don't understand.


That is because I ran out of of spins, you only get 300 and something spins so I was in the negative when my session ended.  I had to take it as a loss.

Tony

trebor

Another four.

Trebor

TwoCatSam

Good grief!  I rarely got to 200 spins in any of my trots.
If dogs don't go to heaven, when I die I want to go where dogs go.  ...Will Rogers

TwoCatSam

In case the trackers were somehow different, I cut and pasted your numbers into my tracker.  Same loss on the last trot.

Don't know what to think.  I'm sure someone will tell me!!   :thumbsup:

TwoCat
If dogs don't go to heaven, when I die I want to go where dogs go.  ...Will Rogers

trebor

Sam,

I was interested in testing this because Flat asserted that it had less variance than other even chance bets. So far this doesn't seem to be the case.

On the other hand how may times have you had a system that can't seem to stop winning and then can't seem to stop losing.

I've found another file with 4000 Dublinbet numbers so I'll use those up and then review the situation.

I know folks will say that's nowhere near enough testing but if it's negative or near break even I'll probably call it a day.

Trebor

TwoCatSam

Close call today........
If dogs don't go to heaven, when I die I want to go where dogs go.  ...Will Rogers

TwoCatSam

Not a good day at table 2.

I just realized they put up more spins for yesterday at table two and that caused a loser.

Worse than rat turds on your ice cream.
If dogs don't go to heaven, when I die I want to go where dogs go.  ...Will Rogers

-