My Best Guess at a Test of the L v F System

[TwoCatSam]

Well, Stef, I've got it down to a five minute job.  And I have hope...........

TCS

[Stepkevh]

I have seen that you're still using the -400 stop loss limit ?

Isnt the other suggested one better ?

[TwoCatSam]

Stef

If you notice my Tally Sheet is all marked up with colors.  This is my way of testing both.  Every five days I will tally what it would have been with a loss of 400 and then, out to the right, I will tally what it would have been with 90.  I guess I should expand the sheet before I save it.

I'm going to try to press on through January.

Sam

[ilukan]

Am doing it from the first day it was posted by Flatman as he suggested but
throughout testing come on this tweak 72/90 and for couple months will come
with complete results....so far very good.Luke

[TwoCatSam]

That's Cool Luke.   I have to hand it to you.   May I call you Cool Hand Luke?  (It's an old American movie with Paul Newman.)

Since you don't know me---that's TwoCat Humor!

I eagerly await your test results.

Sam

[ilukan]

219 sessions from 19.11.last year,and all sessions regardless of how many spins included,some also
from tables 5 and 6.

Also re corrected it in the middle of testing-when 72 + stop regardless on which spin of the 9 cycle,also
same with losing 90.
So far score;

Won=10036 un.
Loss=  7290 un

138 wins
  81 loss

[TwoCatSam]

Thank, Luke!

[porkeporkeporke]

So ,it's a winner then ?

[TwoCatSam]

Don't slice the ham just yet, porke!

Much more testing to be done.  Le'ts muddle through January and see what Ground Hog day brings.

Sam

[TwoCatSam]

Figured for both a 400 and a 90 stop loss.

[ilukan]

I have noticed that you are not including sessions without enough spins in you tally,
which you MUST considering that you are now also testing 72/90...as logic simply
tell you that 72/90 usually ends in the first part of any long session,therefore would suggest it also,
as yesterday you had 3 such sessioh skipped....many times these are on tables 2,5,6..thanks
for listening.

[trebor]

Has anyone tried this on BV. Out of interest I pasted 20 sets of numbers from Random.org into the tracker set to 72/90. Small sample I know but 13 out of 20 bombed.


Trebor

[TwoCatSam]

Luke

If you notice out the the right you will see

1
2
3
4
5
6
7.........These are the numbers of times it went to 90 or beyond.

The colors in the chart tell me what to add in and what to leave out.

I may be wrong, check me out.  I think I'm doing it right.

Thanks

Sam

[ilukan]

For instance you haven't table 5 and 6 from yesterday that could have been played/and in the past I think you are just skeeping em thinking no numbers there/in this new version 72/90....that's what I meant.

[ilukan]

Has anyone tried this on BV. Out of interest I pasted 20 sets of numbers from Random.org into the tracker set to 72/90. Small sample I know but 13 out of 20 bombed.


Trebor

And /regardles bombed or won/what that got to do with roulette.
This is rouletteforum.cc not random.org and couse most of you are testing roulette
with something that have nothing to do with it actually only couse you are too
lazy to test it by real roulette numbers.You and alike will never grasp the difference.
And btw-why testing random numbers with ones that are not random...as roulette
numbers are not...there are many elements that proves it.