Touching numbers

[iggiv]

I don't think Turner meant anything bad towards u, Proof.

by the way, your section is a real HIT. as i can read all the stuff collected there, it's very cool.

Goodbye Turner

[Skakus]

Hi Turner.

When a number repeats within 5 spins do you start betting that number and 2 either side, or do you only bet when 2 consecutive numbers hit within 5 spins?



>>> Don't bother. I see what to do, 2 before/1 after.

Cheers.

[Turner]

Hi Turner.

When a number repeats within 5 spins do you start betting that number and 2 either side, or do you only bet when 2 consecutive numbers hit within 5 spins?



>>> Don't bother. I see what to do, 2 before/1 after.

Cheers.

Skakus....sometimes you cant do that. its governed by 0 and 36 arnt touching. 0,0 is 0,1,2,3......1,1 is 0,1,2,3......36,36 is 33,34,35,36 etc.
Turner

[Skakus]

ok, thanks for that.


What about this?

13.7.21.22.14.

Do I keep betting 20.21.22.23, or do I switch to 12.13.14.15?

[Turner]

ok, thanks for that.


What about this?

13.7.21.22.14.

Do I keep betting 20.21.22.23, or do I switch to 12.13.14.15?

Switch....its all about the last number out compared to the last 5

[Skakus]

gotcha

[Turner]

These are my test results attached of touching numbers using numbers from Airball roulette

Each session is made up of 185 numbers and I have 7 sessions completed .I used $1 units

Flat betting .I need help to find out what stop-loss to use and what profit to stop at.I will

give a run through of my balance for each session. Hope some one can help.

Rob....sorry but I dont get the results in the PDF...perhaps you could explain

Please remember, this is in notepad and I am trying to destroy it. It has no stop loss or win goal because it doesnt exist yet
Turner

[TwoCatSam]

Just made 300 units on BV zero wheel.  Zero hurt!

Still, this looks good, but it could all be luck.

Thanks, Turner.

Sam

[soggett]

back to testing....and a bad day at the races....well....I came in this casino with high hopes, and left short of some change from my pocket. Honest testing...warts and all....as they say.

Spielbank Wiesbaden Permanenzen

Eine Veröffentlichung oder Ver-
vielfältigung ohne schriftliche
Genehmigung dieser Daten ist
nicht gestattet.

Tisch:                       T2
Datum:               2012-12-23

its just 135 spins, do you have more, maybe it went up?

on a side note, did you maybe think of trying this wheel based and not layout based? do you think it could work like that also?

[Turner]

its just 135 spins, do you have more, maybe it went up?

on a side note, did you maybe think of trying this wheel based and not layout based? do you think it could work like that also?

Soggett...i think it would....give ot a try..all numbers touch so no 0,36 issue.
I think our friend Roulettekey tried this.
Personally....ive fell foul to skipping from one idea to another in the past. It looks like im not listening to tweeks from other members....but i am noting them. Im gonna try and murder it with these rules only....taking notes.
If i mess with the rules....i wouldnt of noticed how many times the next number out is a touching miss...i.e betting 5,6,7,8 and 9 hits.
Trying to be dogmatic in my approach
Recently....a few people got a bit excited by another idea of mine where you play in one doz only when it hits 2 times in the last 5.
I had no recollection of posting it. Thats how little i had tested it.
Turner

[ROB22]

I will try to explain the pdf  file for you Turner.

Example .

5
10
33
12
32

Touching numbers   32,33 within 5

Start betting 31,32,33,34
8
33   win     

Same touching numbers so keep betting 31,32,33,34

36
23
14
22  new touching numbers 22,23

The LW registry for 31,32,33,34

LLLWLL      L = -4    W = +32     Balance  +12

Start betting  21,22,23,24

So every time I get new touching numbers I show the  LLLLWLLLL and balance

for that session flat betting.

I have been also testing a progression of +1 after  9 losses and after a win

dropping back down to 1.When I get 8 losses and 1 win  LLLLLLLLW which

is even I stay on same progression. I have tested this on the 7 sessions

and its done well .The lowest the balance went to is -272 in 1 session and

it went to +100 much faster.

I have tested lots of different systems over the last couple of years and I know what to expect.

The more I test a system the more it starts losing. I will keep testing when I have

time. I wonder if airball roulette is better for the repeating numbers .Maybe its

just luck , I hope not.

[Jordsie669]

Turner did you ever think of using touching numbers on the wheel? (like really touching)

[Skakus]

Turner did you ever think of using touching numbers on the wheel? (like really touching)

Makes no difference to the results, and it's much easier using the numerical order. Though I'm not sure why Turner didn't just loop the numbers and touch 0,36.

It would not effect the overall % in the long run, and is a bit tidier.

[Turner]

Makes no difference to the results, and it's much easier using the numerical order. Though I'm not sure why Turner didn't just loop the numbers and touch 0,36.

It would not effect the overall % in the long run, and is a bit tidier.

Skakus....I dont know either....to be frank. i think I wanted to see numbers. Not anything else...and felt 0 and 36 arnt touching.

I will try...which I agree...will tidy things up.....Thanks for the pointer...

Look at me...happy to take on others ideas and being respectful...LMAO

[Turner]

CHANGES.

Due to popular request...i felt changes were needed. Its based purely on testing testing testing.

Testing is absolutly paramount to "seeing" and "feeling" the true reason for a system. Testing is where you get intimate with your idea.

Skakus...and others noted some things. A stop point...because this can go on for ever without a trigger. So.....

1. dont bet the same trigger more than 9 times, or 7 times (see no.3)

2. Pass 0-36....so 0,1 can be 36,0,1,2.......35,36 would be 34,35,36,0

3. on a repeat...bet 5...so 0,0 = 35,36,0,1,2
it moves around like a slide rule now. Much easier.

Thanks for the help.

Turner