Jack Kennedy Square Roulette Method...anyone have it?

[A3on]

First of all thanks moles40 for the useful link ^^

I've read it and understand everything till chapter 9
After that I don't know if he is explaining another system or completing the last one :S

What you guys think?

[Carsch]

First of all thanks moles40 for the useful link ^^

I've read it and understand everything till chapter 9
After that I don't know if he is explaining another system or completing the last one :S

What you guys think?

Basically, this is what i understand he's saying to play his SQUARE ROULETTE:

Track the last 38 numbers spun. On the next spin. play all the numbers within those last 38 numbers that have a same color as last spun number. The amount of numbers played could vary. I just checked a set of 38 numbers from the German casino, and was able to find 11 red numbers that could be played on the next spin.

With his other system, Jacks' Positional Roulette, you only play 4 numbers. These numbers are selected from the wheel itself.

Someone correct me if i'm wrong.

[A3on]

The Square Roulette I had fully understand.

Jacks' Positional Roulette, I have no clue what is about :S I just know it involves tracking the ball spins C and CC

[Drogan]

Wow!~

What a great read! When I first read it I just read Part 1 and I was kind of left scratching my head a little when I was done.  But then when I came back to the thread and saw the link for Part 2. . . . . that explains the system much better.  Thanks Moles for posting the new links!

@Ken
Thanks for starting this thread.  I have gotten quite an education today.

@carsch
Thanks for clearing up the whole tracking 38 spins thing.  I wasn't very clear on that.  He gets kind of deep in the book and off track at times.  It threw me off pretty bad with all the percentages and statistics.  But I finally got back on track.
The Positional Roulette is what I really took away from it.  That is a very cool method of play. 

I have only tested it twice.  But the first 38 spins I hit 5 times. (Just like the book said) And the second time I hit 6 times.  So there is obviously something to it.  Of course more testing will have to be done.  I haven't really had that much time to test.  I spent most of the day reading the damn thing!

The thing that I don't get about the clockwise and counter clockwise bet selection is how do you know when to switch from C to CC or from CC to C? He says that he sometimes plays one direction for more than 20 spins.  WTF?

@A3on
Positional is tough to suss out at first but once you understand it.  You can win.  Lots!

So since I don't understand when to switch from C to CC.  I am in the process of making a chart that denotes all C and all CC bets for each number.  I figure if we can win 5 out of 38 spins by playing only 4 numbers then we should be able to win more by playing all 8 numbers.

Right?

I will post the chart when I am finished.  Thanks again Ken for starting this thread. 

D

[A3on]

@carsch
Thanks for clearing up the whole tracking 38 spins thing.  I wasn't very clear on that.  He gets kind of deep in the book and off track at times.  It threw me off pretty bad with all the percentages and statistics.  But I finally got back on track.
The Positional Roulette is what I really took away from it.  That is a very cool method of play. 

I have only tested it twice.  But the first 38 spins I hit 5 times. (Just like the book said) And the second time I hit 6 times.  So there is obviously something to it.  Of course more testing will have to be done.  I haven't really had that much time to test.  I spent most of the day reading the damn thing!

The thing that I don't get about the clockwise and counter clockwise bet selection is how do you know when to switch from C to CC or from CC to C? He says that he sometimes plays one direction for more than 20 spins.  WTF?

@A3on
Positional is tough to suss out at first but once you understand it.  You can win.  Lots!

But the Square Roulette doesn't involve C and CC, or does it?
Because I hadn't understand if we have Square Roulette system that is about track 38 numbers, bet on last color on numbers already shown (and dont bet on repeat) and Jacks' Positional Roulette that is a different system and it's about C and CC or if Jacks' Positional Roulette and Square Roulette are made to play together and make only one system
:s

I'm kinda confused on it

------------------------------------------------

I will post the chart when I am finished.

Thanks

[albalaha]

Dear Friends,
                  I did not find the book either interesting or informative. Could someone please test the method and provide success rate here?

[Drogan]

I believe Square Ro-let is the name of the "system", the website, the little card, and the whole idea of the book.  But the actual method of play is Jack's Positional Roulette.  That is where you choose the 4 numbers C or CC on the chart.

Like I said earlier, he kind of went off the rails when he was explaining the 38 spins thing.  So I didn't get that until Carsch explained it earlier.  He is certainly partial to the Positional method.  I believe that is the whole BACKBONE of the system.  He even refers to it a couple of times when he is explaining the even money bets. (see below)

UNABLE TO COMPREHEND
I repeat, "I am unable to comprehend why some body would want to play even money bets especially on a double-zero roulette wheel when they can learn to play 'Jack's Positional Roulette' for a lot less risk and have a chance to win big money. "---Even Money Part 4

[Drogan]

Here is the bet selection chart as promised.   It is only for the European
wheel I don't play American if I can help it. 

[Carsch]

But the Square Roulette doesn't involve C and CC, or does it?

It's like Drogan said...............and i had to re-read the damn thing to confirm that.

"Square Ro-let is the name of the "system", the website, the little card, and the whole idea of the book.  But the actual method of play is Jack's Positional Roulette.  That is where you choose the 4 numbers C or CC on the chart. "

Basically, with the 38 numbers he is showing that certain numbers have better probabilities than other numbers. That's all it is. So never mind the tracking of the 38 numbers, although, i'm sure the idea can be made into a system.

As for what side (C & CC) to play, he says at one point:

"after every spin you will continually be playing four out of nine positions. Other than that you can forget about when to play C or CC positions or high or low positions or playing four positions adjacent to each other. So without reference to previous positional hits, you can without rime or reason just pick your four positions. You will find that the majority of time you will be a winner; and when you lose it will be cancelled by just one win."

[A3on]

Thanks for the help

Then, the only important part is from chapter 9 to chapter 15 (Jack positional roulette). That is the real method to play, right?

Afonso

[Drogan]

@A3on

Yes.  That is correct.

@albalaha
See below.

So I just played a test session at Dublinbet.  Here are the results of 38 spins.

26
21
27 W
23 W
19
18 W
0
10
5
34
26
14
33
26
13 W
32
3
11
30
17
11 W
14
5
7
29
12
20
22
11
7
3
15
17 W
0
19
24
27

So as you can see.  There were 6 wins out of 38 spins.  (The book says the average is 5) So if you play this with a progression of 1. 1. 1. 1. 2. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 8 you would always come out ahead.  If you played all 8 spots. 

My theory of. . .  if you play 8 spots instead of 4 didn't pan out so great. 

So  I went back and re-read the part of the book about C and CC.  And here is what I get from that. . . . . When you are looking at the card, wherever the next number is you go to clockwise or counter-clockwise to that number and that is how you choose.

For instance.  In the session above I spun 26.  Then I spun 21.  So from 26 to 21 is four red numbers over clockwise.  If the number of spaces over is four or lower you choose a low position, and if the number of spaces over is five or higher you choose a high position.  So since it is only four spaces clockwise we would choose LC(low and clockwise) So 21RLC is 25. 34. 27. 36.  Next we spin 27.  WIN!
So now we count the spaces from 21 to 27 and we see that it is three red spaces C, we would choose 27LC which is 36. 30. 23. 5 Next we spin 23.  WIN!
So now we count the spaces from 27 to 23 and we see that it is three red spaces C, so we would choose 23LC which is 5. 16. 1. 14 Next we spin 19.  Lose.
So now we count the spaces from 23 to 19 and we see that it is seven red spaces counter-clockwise, so we would choose 19HCC which is 7. 18. 9. 14 Next we spin 18.  WIN!
And so on. . . .

He says in the book that the reason he stays with one direction for more than 20 times sometimes is because he follows the trend of the table.  So he deviates from the system according to the trend.  (Umm. . . it's HIS system.  He can do that. )

So in conclusion. . . . I would suggest not playing all 8 numbers and only play the 4 C or CC numbers that the system calls for.  It will be more profitable. 

I would also suggest using this system as a hit and run technique.  Track a couple of spins, place the bets until you win and then walk away.  Come back after a few minutes and do it again.  I would not suggest playing 38 spins at a time.  You will more than likely be only slightly ahead by the end.

The progression for playing 4 spots with one unit is 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 2. 2. 2. 2. 3. 3. 3. 4. 4. 5. 5. 6
That is a 20 spin progression.  If you don't win after 20 spins.  You are simply doing something wrong.  Go back and re-read the book.

Last but not least, I have revised the betting chart to make it all inclusive.  I have included in Square Ro-let Wheel, and I have divided the C and CC bets to make it easier on all of us.

Enjoy! 

D

[Carsch]

Check out my system i posted here, "4-5 number system" (just so to compare notes)

It's basically almost like Jacks' system, except that the sectors you pick your numbers are chosen a bit differently (i might change that after i check Jack's system).

I use this progression:

10 step 4-number progression: 1,1,1,1ââ,¬â€œ2,2,2,2ââ,¬â€œ3,3

Bet/Units------------Investment-----------------Net Profit if win

1----------------------------4--------------------------------32
1----------------------------8--------------------------------28
1----------------------------12------------------------------24
1----------------------------16------------------------------20
2----------------------------24------------------------------48
2----------------------------32------------------------------40
2----------------------------40------------------------------32
2----------------------------48------------------------------24
3----------------------------60------------------------------48
3----------------------------72------------------------------36

Reach the 10th bet with no win, restart the progression all over again. Restart progression at any time you have a win.

You'll need about 80 units to play a 10 spin session

[A3on]

Hi Drogan

Isn't the system suppose to be flat betting?

[Drogan]

Technically.  I think it is. 

But a progression always gives you a better shot at winning.

Look at the session above.  The last win would have taken me 11 spins
to get a win.  So technically it would be a loss.  That is why I added the progression.

With the progression even if it takes you 20 spins to get a win.  You will still
be up 1 unit at the end.   

D

[MrJ]

I agree Drogan!  Ken