Bet selection that won't have huge losing streaks?

[Jordsie669]

2
1    W
1    L
2    W
1    W
2    W
2    L
1 1 W
1 1 L  L
1 2 L  W
1    L

1
2 W
1 W
1 L

That is right how i show it above.
Then you wait for a new outcome.

See my illustration again.

isn't that the same way I did it? And I think you missed a number I'll put a "X" Where you forgot it:

2
1    W
1    L
2    W
1    W
2    W
2    L
1 1 W
1 1 L  L
1 2 L  W
1 X L

EDIT: THIS POST IS OUTDATED!

[Jordsie669]

I read the posts again, and I didn't knew that after 1 win in the second column, the session would end, but now i know!

[Jordsie669]

2
1    W
1    L
2    W
1    W
2    W
2    L
1 1 W
1 1 L  L
1 2 L  W
1    L

1
2 W
1 W
1 L

That is right how i show it above.
Then you wait for a new outcome.

See my illustration again.

Well, I studied your bet selection quoted above and I came to a conclusion:
All you're doing is:
Betting the opposite of the last color, and wait 1 spin after 4 consecutive losses and then bet the opposite of that last spin!!
So why do so much effort noting that down in weird clusters and columns???

[Skakus]

Well, I studied your bet selection quoted above and I came to a conclusion:
All you're doing is:
Betting the opposite of the last color, and wait 1 spin after 4 consecutive losses and then bet the opposite of that last spin!!
So why do so much effort noting that down in weird clusters and columns???

Because ego is full of it and he don't know it, that is sad. 

[albertojonas]

RANDOM.ORG 300 spins
01.01.13


[/code]

Code Select Expand

2 1
2 L 2 W
2 L
2 L
1
2
1
2 W
1 W
2 W
2 L
1 W
1 L
1 L
2 W
2 L
1 W
2 W
2 L
1 W 1
1 L 1 L
1 L 2 W
1 L



1
2 W
1 W
2 W
1 W
2 W
2 L
1 W
2 W
2 L
1 W
2 W
1 W
2 W
1 W
2 W
1 W
1 L
1 L
2 W
2 L
1 W
2 W
2 L
2 L
1 W
2 W
2 L
1 W 1
1 L 2 W
1 L
1 L


2
2 L
1 W 2
1 L 1 W
1 L
1 L


2
2 L
1 W
2 W
1 W
1 L
2 W
1 W
2 W
2 L
1 W
2 W
1 W
2 W
1 W
2 W
1 W
1 L
2 W
1 W 1
1 L 2 W
1 L
1 L


2 1
2 L 1 L
2 L 2 W
2 L



1
1 L
2 W
2 L
2 L
1 W
2 W
2 L
2 L
1 W
1 L
2 W
1 W
2 W
2 L
1 W
2 W
1 W
1 L
2 W
2 L
1 W
2 W
2 L
1 W
2 W
1 W
1 L
2 W
1 W
1 L
2 W
2 L
1 W
2 W
1 W
2 W
1 W
1 L
2 W
2 L
1 W
2 W 1
2 L 1 L
2 L 2 W
2 L



1
1 L
2 W
1 W
2 W 1
2 L 1 L
2 L 1 L
2 L 1 L




1
1 L
2 W 2
2 L 1 W
2 L
2 L


2 1
2 L 2 W
2 L
2 L


2
1 W
1 L
2 W
1 W
2 W 1
2 L 2 W
2 L
2 L


2
1 W 2
1 L 1 W
1 L
1 L


1
2 W
2 L
2 L
1 W
2 W 1
2 L 2 W
2 L
2 L


2
2 L
2 L
1 W
2 W
1 W
1 L
1 L
2 W
2 L
1 W 2
1 L 2 L
1 L 2 L
1 L 1 W




1
1 L
2 W 1
2 L 1 L
2 L 2 W
2 L



1
2 W
1 W
1 L
1 L
2 W
1 W
1 L
2 W 2
2 L 1 W
2 L
2 L


1
1 L
2 W
2 L 2
2 L 1 W
2 L
2 L


1
1 L
1 L
2 W
2 L
2 L
1 W
1 L
1 L
2 W
2 L
2 L
1 W
2 W 2
2 L 2 L
2 L 1 W
2 L



2
1 W
1 L
2 W 1
2 L 2 W
2 L
2 L


1
2 W
2 L
2 L
1 W
1 L
2 W
1 W
2 W
1 W
1 L
1 L
2 W
1 W
2 W
2 L
2 L

[Jordsie669]

Euhm, ...
albertojonas we don't need anymore spins.
And we don't even need to cluster and stuff (read the posts above!!!)

Cheers, Jordsie.

[ego]

Well, I studied your bet selection quoted above and I came to a conclusion:
All you're doing is:
Betting the opposite of the last color, and wait 1 spin after 4 consecutive losses and then bet the opposite of that last spin!!
So why do so much effort noting that down in weird clusters and columns???

Because you at the end don't know what cluster of formation you should bet against, if you don't put the next outcome next to the last string of loses.
And you can start from any level you like.

If i would state that you just play opposite at all times you would get a different betting behavior.
Its the tail or the last three loses that end you with a serie of five.
But if you don't clustering the formation you don't know how to play against the series of five as you don't know the clustering formation.

So the sequential betting is against four series of eight, twice.
12 or 9 attempts depending on what level you start from.
I think five is a good level to start from.

[Jordsie669]

I read all your spins and all it does is:
Betting the opposite of the last color, and wait 1 spin after 4 consecutive losses and then bet the opposite of that last spin!!
Go trough your spins and do the following above, you'll see it's just all that!

And for what you said:
So the sequential betting is against four series of eight, twice.
You'll get the same effect using the following above.

Cheers, Jordsie.