Casino Breaker

[GLC]

BW, If 1-2-3 street is number 1 and 4-5-6 street is number 2, then continuing down the table layout, all the odd number streets have 2 odd numbers in them and all the even numbered streets have 2 even numbers in them?  Maybe your system works better with Streets!


GLC

[ludo8400]

@ Ignatus


I found a loss from 10 in a streak in Perm Wiesbaden.


ludo8400

[buffalowizard]

@ Ignatus


I found a loss from 10 in a streak in Perm Wiesbaden.


ludo8400

Ludo

Are you talking about ignatus's system or mine?

Cheers

BW

[buffalowizard]

BW, If 1-2-3 street is number 1 and 4-5-6 street is number 2, then continuing down the table layout, all the odd number streets have 2 odd numbers in them and all the even numbered streets have 2 even numbers in them?  Maybe your system works better with Streets! :LoL:


GLC

Hi GLC

the odd numbers here are only represented by the DS number 1-6
1,3,5 being the odd numbered DS
2,4,6 being even

Therefore the pocket numbers aren't really representative in this system

You could do it with streets but I've found the DS to be easier to track

[ludo8400]

@ buffalowizard


I tested it yours way buffalowizard




Ludo8400

[buffalowizard]

Thanks Ludo,
I certainly  not under any illusions that this is infallible. It is still the least volatile EC bet I have found

[rolf-harris]

What are, do you think, the reasons for  this method not seeming to throw up long runs of losses.
After all it all boils down to an even chance bet.
If we were playing red or black we would soon see long runs  of one colour that would destroy  us.
But I tested this last night and didn't go past three losses in a row.
Admitted for only a couple of hours.
Do you reckon a long losing sequence of say 12 is less likely than if we were playing the layout even chance bets....or are we overdue a bad run?

[Timo]

Nick is sharper than my wife's tongue!

Hehheh! Almost drop my chair for that comment!!    Very well said!

[buffalowizard]

What are, do you think, the reasons for  this method not seeming to throw up long runs of losses.
After all it all boils down to an even chance bet.
If we were playing red or black we would soon see long runs  of one colour that would destroy  us.
But I tested this last night and didn't go past three losses in a row.
Admitted for only a couple of hours.
Do you reckon a long losing sequence of say 12 is less likely than if we were playing the layout even chance bets....or are we overdue a bad run?

Rolf,
I don't know the answer to that. It's why I keep testing. With my cynics hat on, it may be that because we are only betting every third spin, that time and amounts of spins are elongated, compared to looking at consecutive runs of EC.
However I am hopeful that this method sees less long runs of losses than any other and can therefore be manipulated to our benefit.
Cheers Rolf

[rolf-harris]

Oh, I was betting continuously..a run of all same would have wiped me out ..... lol
As would a run of alternate odd and even....Phew.....but it worked for two hours.

[Roughy]

I did a quick test betting continuously just to get in the swing of what to bet after each trigger so that I don't even have to think about it. It still did very well, +55 units (.50p) in about an hour of live play. But like Rolf says, a run of repeats etc and we would be wiped out,  so hopefully betting every third spin will help us out. Going to test this properly tonight and will report back.

[buffalowizard]

Oh, I was betting continuously..a run of all same would have wiped me out ..... LoL
As would a run of alternate odd and even....Phew.....but it worked for two hours.

Betting every third spin can protect against repeats though and is a strength with this.

Such as:

2 2 4 L
4 4 2 L
2 2 1 W

So there you have 8 repeating DS's but only 2 losses

BW

[ewarwoowar]

just ran this through over 300 spins from dublinbet. the results are as follows:-

4 3 1 W
2 2 3 W
3 4 6 W
3 5 6 W
1 1 1 L
4 3 2 L
2 3 3 W
5 6 1 L
6 4 5 W
1 3 4 W
5 1 3 L
6 1 1 W
6 4 6 L
6 4 1 W
3 4 2 W
4 2 3 W
3 4 3 L
4 1 4 L
1 3 3 L
3 3 1 L
2 0
3 2 4 W
3 4 3 L
1 2 3 L
1 4 5 L
1 5 6 W
3 1 1 L
2 2 2 L
6 3 3 W
3 2 5 L
5 3 6 W
4 4 4 L
5 2 1 L
4 2 4 L
1 6 1 L
4 6 6 L
6 3 6 L
5 5 6 W
2 2 4 L
4 4 2 L
3 2 3 L
3 4 6 W
2 1 3 W
2 1 6 L
2 6 4 L
3 3 2 W
3 5 1 L
0
2 0
6 3 2 L
1 4 5 L
4 5 3 W
3 4 4 W
5 2 1 L
2 3 1 W
6 4 1 W
2 6 6 L
3 6 4 W
3 1 4 W
6 3 1 W
3 3 6 W
1 3 6 W
3 4 6 W
5 3 3 L
2 2 2 L
0
1 5 2 W
1 2 2 W
4 2 6 L
3 5 1 L
6 2 2 L
6 5 2 L
0
6 6 5 W
4 3 6 L
2 6 5 W
4 5 6 L
2 5 3 W
5 3 2 W
5 1 4 W
3 1 5 L
4 1 1 W
1 3 6 W
4 0
5 4 5 L
1 1 2 W
6 1 6 L
3 6 5 L
3 2 6 W
2 0
5 5 6 W
1 4 2 W
3 1 5 L
0
2 5 2 L
3 3 5 L
1 4 3 L
0
6 5 2 L
3 3 2 W
2 5 1 L
6 4 5 W
3 4 4 W
4 4 4 L
4 3 3 W
3 2 4 W
6 3 5 W
0
6 5 2 L
3 1 4 W
6 4 1 W
5 2 6 W
1 4 2 W
5 2 2 W

326 spins, probably more than you would sit through in a b&m casino and so a very good test.
longest losing run of 6, with a 6 consecutive win run. i'm not sure about the guetting progression with this method because the wins seem to come in 2's and 3's.
the above spins just about show a profit with a flat bet, but how about grouping the results into sessions of 5 and if in minus after the 5 games raise one unit? if in plus, stay same or lower by one unit.
we could just play the leveller for the 5 games.

[unre4lbg]

Is anyone still playing this? I gave it a few tests seems quite balanced, With the progression someone posted above this could be a nice system. Does anyone can recommend a decent bankroll? Im willing to give it a try with real money.

[rolf-harris]

I only play for fun , the 1000 units they give you would be OK.
Maybe less, but I was doubling up after a loss each time.